模糊情况下1/N投资组合是否最优?

IF 1.8 4区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS
Nan He , Tan Wang
{"title":"模糊情况下1/N投资组合是否最优?","authors":"Nan He ,&nbsp;Tan Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.econlet.2025.112624","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper proposes a new criterion incorporating ambiguity into mean–variance analysis, and tests whether the 1/N portfolio is optimal under ambiguity across various datasets. Results indicate that the naive portfolio is not always optimal under ambiguity, despite often performing well out-of-sample.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11468,"journal":{"name":"Economics Letters","volume":"256 ","pages":"Article 112624"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is 1/N investment portfolio optimal under ambiguity?\",\"authors\":\"Nan He ,&nbsp;Tan Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.econlet.2025.112624\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This paper proposes a new criterion incorporating ambiguity into mean–variance analysis, and tests whether the 1/N portfolio is optimal under ambiguity across various datasets. Results indicate that the naive portfolio is not always optimal under ambiguity, despite often performing well out-of-sample.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11468,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economics Letters\",\"volume\":\"256 \",\"pages\":\"Article 112624\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economics Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165176525004616\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economics Letters","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165176525004616","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文提出了一种将模糊性纳入均值-方差分析的新准则,并在不同数据集上检验了1/N组合在模糊性下是否最优。结果表明,朴素投资组合在模糊情况下并不总是最优的,尽管在样本外通常表现良好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is 1/N investment portfolio optimal under ambiguity?
This paper proposes a new criterion incorporating ambiguity into mean–variance analysis, and tests whether the 1/N portfolio is optimal under ambiguity across various datasets. Results indicate that the naive portfolio is not always optimal under ambiguity, despite often performing well out-of-sample.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Economics Letters
Economics Letters ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
348
审稿时长
30 days
期刊介绍: Many economists today are concerned by the proliferation of journals and the concomitant labyrinth of research to be conquered in order to reach the specific information they require. To combat this tendency, Economics Letters has been conceived and designed outside the realm of the traditional economics journal. As a Letters Journal, it consists of concise communications (letters) that provide a means of rapid and efficient dissemination of new results, models and methods in all fields of economic research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信