{"title":"模糊情况下1/N投资组合是否最优?","authors":"Nan He , Tan Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.econlet.2025.112624","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper proposes a new criterion incorporating ambiguity into mean–variance analysis, and tests whether the 1/N portfolio is optimal under ambiguity across various datasets. Results indicate that the naive portfolio is not always optimal under ambiguity, despite often performing well out-of-sample.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11468,"journal":{"name":"Economics Letters","volume":"256 ","pages":"Article 112624"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is 1/N investment portfolio optimal under ambiguity?\",\"authors\":\"Nan He , Tan Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.econlet.2025.112624\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This paper proposes a new criterion incorporating ambiguity into mean–variance analysis, and tests whether the 1/N portfolio is optimal under ambiguity across various datasets. Results indicate that the naive portfolio is not always optimal under ambiguity, despite often performing well out-of-sample.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11468,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economics Letters\",\"volume\":\"256 \",\"pages\":\"Article 112624\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economics Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165176525004616\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economics Letters","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165176525004616","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Is 1/N investment portfolio optimal under ambiguity?
This paper proposes a new criterion incorporating ambiguity into mean–variance analysis, and tests whether the 1/N portfolio is optimal under ambiguity across various datasets. Results indicate that the naive portfolio is not always optimal under ambiguity, despite often performing well out-of-sample.
期刊介绍:
Many economists today are concerned by the proliferation of journals and the concomitant labyrinth of research to be conquered in order to reach the specific information they require. To combat this tendency, Economics Letters has been conceived and designed outside the realm of the traditional economics journal. As a Letters Journal, it consists of concise communications (letters) that provide a means of rapid and efficient dissemination of new results, models and methods in all fields of economic research.