Nima Farshidfar,Mohammad Amin Amiri,Nathan E Estrin,Paras Ahmad,Yufeng Zhang,Anton Sculean,Richard J Miron
{"title":"富血小板液体纤维蛋白(液体PRF)在颞下颌关节疾病中的应用:一项具有临床推荐的叙述性综述。","authors":"Nima Farshidfar,Mohammad Amin Amiri,Nathan E Estrin,Paras Ahmad,Yufeng Zhang,Anton Sculean,Richard J Miron","doi":"10.1111/prd.70012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AIM\r\nThis narrative review aimed to gather evidence from comparative and non-comparative clinical studies to assess: (1) whether the administration of liquid platelet-rich fibrin (liquid PRF) provides any clinical benefits for managing temporomandibular disorders (TMD), and if so, based on comparative clinical studies, (2) whether it offers more benefits than no treatment or other treatment modalities, either as a standalone therapy or as an adjunct.\r\n\r\nMATERIALS AND METHODS\r\nTo compile all relevant data, we performed a systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, supplemented by a Google Scholar search for gray literature and a manual screening of reference lists from eligible studies and relevant reviews, up to April 22, 2025. A total of 23 clinical studies (19 comparative and 4 non-comparative) were ultimately included in this review.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nAcross the included studies, the administration of liquid PRF has been shown to have beneficial effects in reducing pain and enhancing maximum mouth opening (MMO) in patients with TMD. In the majority of studies, the adjunctive use of liquid PRF following arthrocentesis demonstrated greater positive effects compared with arthrocentesis alone. When used adjunctively with arthrocentesis, liquid PRF also showed comparable or superior clinical outcomes in terms of pain reduction and MMO improvement compared with platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and hyaluronic acid (HA).\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nBased on these findings, the administration of liquid PRF following arthrocentesis appears to be a promising approach for the management of TMD. To support clinical application, this review also presented a step-by-step protocol to guide dental and medical practitioners in the effective use of liquid PRF in patients with TMD. However, further well-designed randomized clinical trials with standardized methodologies are required to strengthen the evidence base and confirm the therapeutic benefits of liquid PRF in the management of TMD due to the high variability among the included studies.","PeriodicalId":19736,"journal":{"name":"Periodontology 2000","volume":"102 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":15.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of liquid platelet-rich fibrin (liquid PRF) in temporomandibular joint disorders: A narrative review with clinical recommendations.\",\"authors\":\"Nima Farshidfar,Mohammad Amin Amiri,Nathan E Estrin,Paras Ahmad,Yufeng Zhang,Anton Sculean,Richard J Miron\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/prd.70012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AIM\\r\\nThis narrative review aimed to gather evidence from comparative and non-comparative clinical studies to assess: (1) whether the administration of liquid platelet-rich fibrin (liquid PRF) provides any clinical benefits for managing temporomandibular disorders (TMD), and if so, based on comparative clinical studies, (2) whether it offers more benefits than no treatment or other treatment modalities, either as a standalone therapy or as an adjunct.\\r\\n\\r\\nMATERIALS AND METHODS\\r\\nTo compile all relevant data, we performed a systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, supplemented by a Google Scholar search for gray literature and a manual screening of reference lists from eligible studies and relevant reviews, up to April 22, 2025. A total of 23 clinical studies (19 comparative and 4 non-comparative) were ultimately included in this review.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nAcross the included studies, the administration of liquid PRF has been shown to have beneficial effects in reducing pain and enhancing maximum mouth opening (MMO) in patients with TMD. In the majority of studies, the adjunctive use of liquid PRF following arthrocentesis demonstrated greater positive effects compared with arthrocentesis alone. When used adjunctively with arthrocentesis, liquid PRF also showed comparable or superior clinical outcomes in terms of pain reduction and MMO improvement compared with platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and hyaluronic acid (HA).\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSIONS\\r\\nBased on these findings, the administration of liquid PRF following arthrocentesis appears to be a promising approach for the management of TMD. To support clinical application, this review also presented a step-by-step protocol to guide dental and medical practitioners in the effective use of liquid PRF in patients with TMD. However, further well-designed randomized clinical trials with standardized methodologies are required to strengthen the evidence base and confirm the therapeutic benefits of liquid PRF in the management of TMD due to the high variability among the included studies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19736,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Periodontology 2000\",\"volume\":\"102 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":15.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Periodontology 2000\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.70012\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Periodontology 2000","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.70012","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本叙述性综述旨在收集比较和非比较临床研究的证据,以评估:(1)给予富血小板液体纤维蛋白(液体PRF)是否对颞下颌疾病(TMD)的治疗有任何临床益处,如果有,基于比较临床研究,(2)无论是作为单独治疗还是作为辅助治疗,它是否比不治疗或其他治疗方式更有益处。为了汇编所有相关数据,我们对PubMed、Scopus和Web of Science进行了系统搜索,并辅以谷歌Scholar搜索灰色文献和人工筛选符合条件的研究和相关综述的参考文献列表,时间截止到2025年4月22日。共有23项临床研究(19项比较研究和4项非比较研究)最终纳入本综述。结果在纳入的研究中,口服液体PRF已被证明对减轻TMD患者的疼痛和提高最大开口(MMO)有有益的作用。在大多数研究中,与单纯关节穿刺相比,关节穿刺后辅助使用液体PRF显示出更大的积极效果。与富血小板血浆(PRP)和透明质酸(HA)相比,当与关节穿刺辅助使用时,液体PRF在减轻疼痛和改善MMO方面也显示出相当或更好的临床结果。结论基于这些发现,关节穿刺后给予液体PRF似乎是治疗TMD的一种很有前途的方法。为了支持临床应用,本综述还提出了一个分步方案,指导牙科和医疗从业者在TMD患者中有效使用液体PRF。然而,由于纳入研究的高度可变性,需要进一步设计良好的随机临床试验,采用标准化的方法来加强证据基础,并确认液体PRF在TMD治疗中的治疗效果。
Use of liquid platelet-rich fibrin (liquid PRF) in temporomandibular joint disorders: A narrative review with clinical recommendations.
AIM
This narrative review aimed to gather evidence from comparative and non-comparative clinical studies to assess: (1) whether the administration of liquid platelet-rich fibrin (liquid PRF) provides any clinical benefits for managing temporomandibular disorders (TMD), and if so, based on comparative clinical studies, (2) whether it offers more benefits than no treatment or other treatment modalities, either as a standalone therapy or as an adjunct.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
To compile all relevant data, we performed a systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, supplemented by a Google Scholar search for gray literature and a manual screening of reference lists from eligible studies and relevant reviews, up to April 22, 2025. A total of 23 clinical studies (19 comparative and 4 non-comparative) were ultimately included in this review.
RESULTS
Across the included studies, the administration of liquid PRF has been shown to have beneficial effects in reducing pain and enhancing maximum mouth opening (MMO) in patients with TMD. In the majority of studies, the adjunctive use of liquid PRF following arthrocentesis demonstrated greater positive effects compared with arthrocentesis alone. When used adjunctively with arthrocentesis, liquid PRF also showed comparable or superior clinical outcomes in terms of pain reduction and MMO improvement compared with platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and hyaluronic acid (HA).
CONCLUSIONS
Based on these findings, the administration of liquid PRF following arthrocentesis appears to be a promising approach for the management of TMD. To support clinical application, this review also presented a step-by-step protocol to guide dental and medical practitioners in the effective use of liquid PRF in patients with TMD. However, further well-designed randomized clinical trials with standardized methodologies are required to strengthen the evidence base and confirm the therapeutic benefits of liquid PRF in the management of TMD due to the high variability among the included studies.
期刊介绍:
Periodontology 2000 is a series of monographs designed for periodontists and general practitioners interested in periodontics. The editorial board selects significant topics and distinguished scientists and clinicians for each monograph. Serving as a valuable supplement to existing periodontal journals, three monographs are published annually, contributing specialized insights to the field.