中枢性睡眠呼吸暂停的真实世界特征:对29,000名连续接受多导睡眠图检查的患者的回顾。

IF 2
Sanjay R Patel, Michael V Genuardi, Rebecca DeSensi, Marat Fudim, Lars H Lund, Reena Mehra, Robin Germany, Scott McKane
{"title":"中枢性睡眠呼吸暂停的真实世界特征:对29,000名连续接受多导睡眠图检查的患者的回顾。","authors":"Sanjay R Patel, Michael V Genuardi, Rebecca DeSensi, Marat Fudim, Lars H Lund, Reena Mehra, Robin Germany, Scott McKane","doi":"10.1007/s11325-025-03446-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The characteristics of central sleep apnea (CSA) in real-world sleep referral populations remain poorly understood. We used the electronic health record of a large health system to understand the prevalence and risk factors for CSA among patients referred for sleep evaluation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed the records of 29,803 patients who underwent diagnostic polysomnography at six sleep laboratories over 14 years. A validated algorithm was used to extract polysomnographic results. CSA was defined as having an apnea hypopnea index (AHI) ≥ 5, a central apnea index ≥ 5, and a central apnea index > obstructive apnea index, while obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) was defined as AHI ≥ 5, obstructive apnea index ≥ 5, and obstructive apnea index > central apnea index.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 583 patients had CSA (2.0% of overall cohort and 5.5% of those with AHI ≥ 5). Compared to those with OSA, older age and male sex were strong risk factors for CSA. The comorbidities most strongly associated with CSA included prior myocardial infarction and atrial fibrillation with adjusted odds ratios of 1.88 (95% confidence interval 1.28-2.74), and 1.85 (1.43-2.38). The prevalence of CSA in these groups was 7.1%, and 5.8% respectively. Of note, the importance of risk factors varied by sex.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CSA was identified in 2.0% of patients undergoing diagnostic polysomnography in routine clinical practice, with risk varying substantially by demographics and comorbidities. Greater recognition of CSA risk can lead to more thoughtful evaluation to ensure accurate diagnosis and appropriate treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":520777,"journal":{"name":"Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung","volume":"29 5","pages":"296"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12474672/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real world characteristics of central sleep apnea: a review of 29,000 consecutive patients undergoing polysomnography.\",\"authors\":\"Sanjay R Patel, Michael V Genuardi, Rebecca DeSensi, Marat Fudim, Lars H Lund, Reena Mehra, Robin Germany, Scott McKane\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11325-025-03446-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The characteristics of central sleep apnea (CSA) in real-world sleep referral populations remain poorly understood. We used the electronic health record of a large health system to understand the prevalence and risk factors for CSA among patients referred for sleep evaluation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed the records of 29,803 patients who underwent diagnostic polysomnography at six sleep laboratories over 14 years. A validated algorithm was used to extract polysomnographic results. CSA was defined as having an apnea hypopnea index (AHI) ≥ 5, a central apnea index ≥ 5, and a central apnea index > obstructive apnea index, while obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) was defined as AHI ≥ 5, obstructive apnea index ≥ 5, and obstructive apnea index > central apnea index.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 583 patients had CSA (2.0% of overall cohort and 5.5% of those with AHI ≥ 5). Compared to those with OSA, older age and male sex were strong risk factors for CSA. The comorbidities most strongly associated with CSA included prior myocardial infarction and atrial fibrillation with adjusted odds ratios of 1.88 (95% confidence interval 1.28-2.74), and 1.85 (1.43-2.38). The prevalence of CSA in these groups was 7.1%, and 5.8% respectively. Of note, the importance of risk factors varied by sex.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CSA was identified in 2.0% of patients undergoing diagnostic polysomnography in routine clinical practice, with risk varying substantially by demographics and comorbidities. Greater recognition of CSA risk can lead to more thoughtful evaluation to ensure accurate diagnosis and appropriate treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520777,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung\",\"volume\":\"29 5\",\"pages\":\"296\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12474672/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11325-025-03446-5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11325-025-03446-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:现实世界睡眠转诊人群中枢性睡眠呼吸暂停(CSA)的特征仍然知之甚少。我们使用大型卫生系统的电子健康记录来了解转介进行睡眠评估的患者中CSA的患病率和危险因素。方法:我们回顾了14年来在6个睡眠实验室接受诊断性多导睡眠图检查的29,803例患者的记录。采用一种经过验证的算法提取多导睡眠图结果。CSA定义为呼吸暂停低通气指数(AHI)≥5、中枢性呼吸暂停指数≥5、中枢性呼吸暂停指数>阻塞性呼吸暂停指数;阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)定义为AHI≥5、阻塞性呼吸暂停指数≥5、阻塞性呼吸暂停指数>中枢性呼吸暂停指数。结果:共有583例患者发生CSA(占总队列的2.0%,占AHI≥5的5.5%)。与OSA患者相比,年龄和男性是CSA的重要危险因素。与CSA相关性最强的合并症包括既往心肌梗死和房颤,校正优势比分别为1.88(95%可信区间1.28-2.74)和1.85(95%可信区间1.43-2.38)。两组CSA患病率分别为7.1%和5.8%。值得注意的是,风险因素的重要性因性别而异。结论:在常规临床实践中,接受多导睡眠图诊断的患者中,有2.0%的人发现了CSA,其风险因人口统计学和合并症而有很大差异。对CSA风险的更多认识可以导致更周到的评估,以确保准确的诊断和适当的治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Real world characteristics of central sleep apnea: a review of 29,000 consecutive patients undergoing polysomnography.

Purpose: The characteristics of central sleep apnea (CSA) in real-world sleep referral populations remain poorly understood. We used the electronic health record of a large health system to understand the prevalence and risk factors for CSA among patients referred for sleep evaluation.

Methods: We reviewed the records of 29,803 patients who underwent diagnostic polysomnography at six sleep laboratories over 14 years. A validated algorithm was used to extract polysomnographic results. CSA was defined as having an apnea hypopnea index (AHI) ≥ 5, a central apnea index ≥ 5, and a central apnea index > obstructive apnea index, while obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) was defined as AHI ≥ 5, obstructive apnea index ≥ 5, and obstructive apnea index > central apnea index.

Results: A total of 583 patients had CSA (2.0% of overall cohort and 5.5% of those with AHI ≥ 5). Compared to those with OSA, older age and male sex were strong risk factors for CSA. The comorbidities most strongly associated with CSA included prior myocardial infarction and atrial fibrillation with adjusted odds ratios of 1.88 (95% confidence interval 1.28-2.74), and 1.85 (1.43-2.38). The prevalence of CSA in these groups was 7.1%, and 5.8% respectively. Of note, the importance of risk factors varied by sex.

Conclusion: CSA was identified in 2.0% of patients undergoing diagnostic polysomnography in routine clinical practice, with risk varying substantially by demographics and comorbidities. Greater recognition of CSA risk can lead to more thoughtful evaluation to ensure accurate diagnosis and appropriate treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信