不同代EGFR TKIs在易感EGFR突变晚期非小细胞肺癌中的临床结果

IF 3.1
Chia-Yu Kuo, Tien-Chi Huang, Chih-Jen Yang, Mei-Hsuan Lee, Jui-Ying Lee, Ying-Ming Tsai, Kuan-Li Wu, Cheng-Hao Chuang, Inn-Wen Chong, Jen-Yu Hung
{"title":"不同代EGFR TKIs在易感EGFR突变晚期非小细胞肺癌中的临床结果","authors":"Chia-Yu Kuo, Tien-Chi Huang, Chih-Jen Yang, Mei-Hsuan Lee, Jui-Ying Lee, Ying-Ming Tsai, Kuan-Li Wu, Cheng-Hao Chuang, Inn-Wen Chong, Jen-Yu Hung","doi":"10.1002/kjm2.70105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are indicated for advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients harboring susceptible EGFR mutations. The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the effectiveness of different generations of EGFR TKIs. We enrolled 421 patients with stage IV lung adenocarcinoma and sensitizing EGFR mutations receiving an EGFR-TKI as their first-line therapy, including first-generation (1st G, gefitinib and erlotinib), second-generation (2nd G, afatinib), and third-generation (3rd G, osimertinib) EGFR TKIs. The median progression free survival (PFS) (12.10 vs. 16.67 months vs. not reached; p = 0.0002) and overall survival (OS) (31.23 vs. 45.97 months vs. not reached; p = 0.0215) were significantly different between different generations of EGFR TKIs. 3rd G EGFR TKI provided the best PFS, particularly in patients with exon 19 deletion. The patients receiving 1st G EGFR TKIs (p = 0.005), with exon 19 deletion (p = 0.001) and PFS ≥ 270 days (p = 0.012) had a significantly higher T790M mutation rate. There was no survival difference between the patients receiving frontline 3rd G EGFR TKI and those receiving 3rd G EGFR TKI as sequential therapy (median OS 46.60 months vs. not reached, p = 0.1941). The OS of the patients who did not receive 3rd G EGFR TKI as sequential therapy was significantly worse than those receiving 3rd G EGFR TKI as first-line therapy (median OS 22.47 months vs. not reached, p = 0.0042). In conclusion, 3rd G EGFR TKI may provide better survival benefits as first-line therapy for patients harboring sensitizing EGFR mutations, particularly those with exon 19 deletion.</p>","PeriodicalId":94244,"journal":{"name":"The Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences","volume":" ","pages":"e70105"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Outcomes of Different Generation EGFR TKIs in Susceptible EGFR-Mutated Advanced Nonsmall-Cell Lung Cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Chia-Yu Kuo, Tien-Chi Huang, Chih-Jen Yang, Mei-Hsuan Lee, Jui-Ying Lee, Ying-Ming Tsai, Kuan-Li Wu, Cheng-Hao Chuang, Inn-Wen Chong, Jen-Yu Hung\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/kjm2.70105\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are indicated for advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients harboring susceptible EGFR mutations. The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the effectiveness of different generations of EGFR TKIs. We enrolled 421 patients with stage IV lung adenocarcinoma and sensitizing EGFR mutations receiving an EGFR-TKI as their first-line therapy, including first-generation (1st G, gefitinib and erlotinib), second-generation (2nd G, afatinib), and third-generation (3rd G, osimertinib) EGFR TKIs. The median progression free survival (PFS) (12.10 vs. 16.67 months vs. not reached; p = 0.0002) and overall survival (OS) (31.23 vs. 45.97 months vs. not reached; p = 0.0215) were significantly different between different generations of EGFR TKIs. 3rd G EGFR TKI provided the best PFS, particularly in patients with exon 19 deletion. The patients receiving 1st G EGFR TKIs (p = 0.005), with exon 19 deletion (p = 0.001) and PFS ≥ 270 days (p = 0.012) had a significantly higher T790M mutation rate. There was no survival difference between the patients receiving frontline 3rd G EGFR TKI and those receiving 3rd G EGFR TKI as sequential therapy (median OS 46.60 months vs. not reached, p = 0.1941). The OS of the patients who did not receive 3rd G EGFR TKI as sequential therapy was significantly worse than those receiving 3rd G EGFR TKI as first-line therapy (median OS 22.47 months vs. not reached, p = 0.0042). In conclusion, 3rd G EGFR TKI may provide better survival benefits as first-line therapy for patients harboring sensitizing EGFR mutations, particularly those with exon 19 deletion.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94244,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e70105\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/kjm2.70105\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/kjm2.70105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKIs)适用于携带易感EGFR突变的晚期肺腺癌患者。本回顾性研究的目的是比较不同代EGFR TKIs的有效性。我们招募了421例IV期肺腺癌和致敏性EGFR突变的患者,接受EGFR- tki作为一线治疗,包括第一代(第一代G,吉非替尼和厄洛替尼),第二代(第一代G,阿法替尼)和第三代(第三代G,奥西替尼)EGFR tki。不同代EGFR TKIs的中位无进展生存期(PFS)(12.10个月vs. 16.67个月vs.未达到,p = 0.0002)和总生存期(OS)(31.23个月vs. 45.97个月vs.未达到,p = 0.0215)存在显著差异。3g EGFR TKI提供了最好的PFS,特别是在外显子19缺失的患者中。接受第1 G EGFR TKIs (p = 0.005)、外显子19缺失(p = 0.001)和PFS≥270天(p = 0.012)的患者T790M突变率显著升高。接受一线第3 G EGFR TKI治疗的患者与接受第3 G EGFR TKI序贯治疗的患者之间没有生存差异(中位生存期46.60个月vs.未达到,p = 0.1941)。未接受第3 G EGFR TKI序贯治疗的患者的OS明显差于接受第3 G EGFR TKI一线治疗的患者(中位OS为22.47个月vs.未达到,p = 0.0042)。综上所述,3g EGFR TKI作为一线治疗可能为携带敏感性EGFR突变的患者提供更好的生存益处,特别是那些外显子19缺失的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical Outcomes of Different Generation EGFR TKIs in Susceptible EGFR-Mutated Advanced Nonsmall-Cell Lung Cancer.

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are indicated for advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients harboring susceptible EGFR mutations. The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the effectiveness of different generations of EGFR TKIs. We enrolled 421 patients with stage IV lung adenocarcinoma and sensitizing EGFR mutations receiving an EGFR-TKI as their first-line therapy, including first-generation (1st G, gefitinib and erlotinib), second-generation (2nd G, afatinib), and third-generation (3rd G, osimertinib) EGFR TKIs. The median progression free survival (PFS) (12.10 vs. 16.67 months vs. not reached; p = 0.0002) and overall survival (OS) (31.23 vs. 45.97 months vs. not reached; p = 0.0215) were significantly different between different generations of EGFR TKIs. 3rd G EGFR TKI provided the best PFS, particularly in patients with exon 19 deletion. The patients receiving 1st G EGFR TKIs (p = 0.005), with exon 19 deletion (p = 0.001) and PFS ≥ 270 days (p = 0.012) had a significantly higher T790M mutation rate. There was no survival difference between the patients receiving frontline 3rd G EGFR TKI and those receiving 3rd G EGFR TKI as sequential therapy (median OS 46.60 months vs. not reached, p = 0.1941). The OS of the patients who did not receive 3rd G EGFR TKI as sequential therapy was significantly worse than those receiving 3rd G EGFR TKI as first-line therapy (median OS 22.47 months vs. not reached, p = 0.0042). In conclusion, 3rd G EGFR TKI may provide better survival benefits as first-line therapy for patients harboring sensitizing EGFR mutations, particularly those with exon 19 deletion.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信