确定痴呆8 (AD8)问卷在拉美裔人群中的最佳截止点、认知障碍诊断性能、信度和并发效度。

Jaime Perales-Puchalt, Adam Parks, Tina Lewandowski, Jeffrey M Burns, Eric D Vidoni
{"title":"确定痴呆8 (AD8)问卷在拉美裔人群中的最佳截止点、认知障碍诊断性能、信度和并发效度。","authors":"Jaime Perales-Puchalt, Adam Parks, Tina Lewandowski, Jeffrey M Burns, Eric D Vidoni","doi":"10.1101/2025.09.19.25336192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Ascertaining Dementia 8 (AD8) is a brief informant- or self-administered questionnaire designed to screen for cognitive impairment, offering several advantages over performance-based screening tests. We analyzed cross-sectional data from a non-probabilistic sample of English- and Spanish-speaking Latinos who were either cognitively unimpaired or had a research diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment or dementia. Diagnostic performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, and the Youden Index was used to determine the optimal cutoff score. Internal consistency was tested with the Kuder-Richardson Formula 20, and concurrent validity with correlations to the Clinical Dementia Rating scale, Mini-Mental State Exam, and Montreal Cognitive Assessment scores. Among 46 participants, the optimal cutoff was 3 or higher for the total sample and in both language groups. At this threshold, the AD8 showed a sensitivity of 73.7% and specificity of 85.2%, with an area under the curve of 0.843. The AD8 achieved good internal consistency of 0.872 and demonstrated correlations in the expected directions with the cognitive impairment measures. The Spanish version generally outperformed the English version. The AD8 questionnaire has adequate psychometric properties and diagnostic performance among US Latinos. To our knowledge, this is the first manuscript to validate the AD8 among US Latinos. These findings support its use in healthcare settings and its applicability for multiple research purposes.</p>","PeriodicalId":94281,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12458500/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimal cutoff, cognitive impairment diagnostic performance, reliability and concurrent validity of the Ascertaining Dementia 8 (AD8) questionnaire among Latinos.\",\"authors\":\"Jaime Perales-Puchalt, Adam Parks, Tina Lewandowski, Jeffrey M Burns, Eric D Vidoni\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2025.09.19.25336192\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The Ascertaining Dementia 8 (AD8) is a brief informant- or self-administered questionnaire designed to screen for cognitive impairment, offering several advantages over performance-based screening tests. We analyzed cross-sectional data from a non-probabilistic sample of English- and Spanish-speaking Latinos who were either cognitively unimpaired or had a research diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment or dementia. Diagnostic performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, and the Youden Index was used to determine the optimal cutoff score. Internal consistency was tested with the Kuder-Richardson Formula 20, and concurrent validity with correlations to the Clinical Dementia Rating scale, Mini-Mental State Exam, and Montreal Cognitive Assessment scores. Among 46 participants, the optimal cutoff was 3 or higher for the total sample and in both language groups. At this threshold, the AD8 showed a sensitivity of 73.7% and specificity of 85.2%, with an area under the curve of 0.843. The AD8 achieved good internal consistency of 0.872 and demonstrated correlations in the expected directions with the cognitive impairment measures. The Spanish version generally outperformed the English version. The AD8 questionnaire has adequate psychometric properties and diagnostic performance among US Latinos. To our knowledge, this is the first manuscript to validate the AD8 among US Latinos. These findings support its use in healthcare settings and its applicability for multiple research purposes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94281,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12458500/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.19.25336192\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.19.25336192","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

确定痴呆8 (AD8)是一份简短的信息提供者或自我管理的问卷,旨在筛查认知障碍,与基于表现的筛查测试相比,它有几个优势。我们分析了来自英语和西班牙语拉美裔非概率样本的横断面数据,这些拉美裔人要么没有认知障碍,要么被研究诊断为轻度认知障碍或痴呆。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)分析评估诊断效果,并采用约登指数确定最佳临界值。采用Kuder-Richardson公式20进行内部一致性测试,并与临床痴呆评定量表、迷你精神状态测试和蒙特利尔认知评估分数的相关性进行并发效度测试。在46名参与者中,总样本和两个语言组的最佳截止值为3或更高。在该阈值下,AD8的敏感性为73.7%,特异性为85.2%,曲线下面积为0.843。AD8达到了良好的内部一致性,为0.872,与认知障碍测量结果呈现出预期方向的相关性。西班牙语版本的表现普遍优于英语版本。AD8问卷在美国拉丁美洲人中具有足够的心理测量特性和诊断性能。据我们所知,这是第一个在美国拉丁美洲人中验证AD8的手稿。这些发现支持其在医疗保健环境中的使用,并支持其适用于多种研究目的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Optimal cutoff, cognitive impairment diagnostic performance, reliability and concurrent validity of the Ascertaining Dementia 8 (AD8) questionnaire among Latinos.

The Ascertaining Dementia 8 (AD8) is a brief informant- or self-administered questionnaire designed to screen for cognitive impairment, offering several advantages over performance-based screening tests. We analyzed cross-sectional data from a non-probabilistic sample of English- and Spanish-speaking Latinos who were either cognitively unimpaired or had a research diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment or dementia. Diagnostic performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, and the Youden Index was used to determine the optimal cutoff score. Internal consistency was tested with the Kuder-Richardson Formula 20, and concurrent validity with correlations to the Clinical Dementia Rating scale, Mini-Mental State Exam, and Montreal Cognitive Assessment scores. Among 46 participants, the optimal cutoff was 3 or higher for the total sample and in both language groups. At this threshold, the AD8 showed a sensitivity of 73.7% and specificity of 85.2%, with an area under the curve of 0.843. The AD8 achieved good internal consistency of 0.872 and demonstrated correlations in the expected directions with the cognitive impairment measures. The Spanish version generally outperformed the English version. The AD8 questionnaire has adequate psychometric properties and diagnostic performance among US Latinos. To our knowledge, this is the first manuscript to validate the AD8 among US Latinos. These findings support its use in healthcare settings and its applicability for multiple research purposes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信