体感刺激足部矫形器对老年人平衡和稳定性的影响:系统回顾、荟萃分析和荟萃回归。

IF 2.4
Abu Jor, Toshiki Kobayashi, Mohammad Jobair Khan, Shakawath Hosen Opu, Wing-Kai Lam, Stanley J Winser, Fan Gao, Ming Zhang
{"title":"体感刺激足部矫形器对老年人平衡和稳定性的影响:系统回顾、荟萃分析和荟萃回归。","authors":"Abu Jor, Toshiki Kobayashi, Mohammad Jobair Khan, Shakawath Hosen Opu, Wing-Kai Lam, Stanley J Winser, Fan Gao, Ming Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.gaitpost.2025.109974","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Somatosensory stimulation foot orthoses (SSFO) are recommended to enhance postural balance by stimulating mechanoreceptors. However, the underlying mechanisms by which SSFO with varying protrusion designs influence postural balance remain unclear.</p><p><strong>Research question: </strong>How do SSFO affect postural balance in older adults, and what role do variations in protrusion design play in these effects?</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library from inception to December 2024. Eighteen studies with 27 SSFO conditions examining the effects on static and dynamic balance in older adults were included in the meta-analysis. Balance parameters reported in at least 10 SSFO conditions were further analyzed using meta-regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pooled analyses indicated that SSFO use reduced center of pressure (CoP) displacement during standing, particularly in studies evaluating immediate effects and using SSFO with specific design features. Meta-regression analysis revealed significant positive correlations between effect sizes for anteroposterior CoP range and SSFO with arch-support structures [Coeff: 0.45, 95 % CI (0.19, 0.72), p = 0.001] or site-specific protrusions [Coeff: 0.32, 95 % CI (0.09, 0.56), p = 0.008]. SSFO also significantly improved Timed Up and Go scores [MD= -1.15, 95 % CI (-1.82, -0.47), p < 0.001], while no significant changes were observed in gait or other functional mobility measures.</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>These findings underscore the potential of customized SSFO designs to enhance mechanoreceptor stimulation and improve postural balance in older adults. While design-specific SSFO may support improvements in static balance for clinical applications, evidence of benefits on gait and broader functional mobility is still limited.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>(PROSPERO ID: CRD42024592630).</p>","PeriodicalId":94018,"journal":{"name":"Gait & posture","volume":" ","pages":"109974"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of somatosensory stimulation foot orthoses on balance and stability in older adults: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression.\",\"authors\":\"Abu Jor, Toshiki Kobayashi, Mohammad Jobair Khan, Shakawath Hosen Opu, Wing-Kai Lam, Stanley J Winser, Fan Gao, Ming Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gaitpost.2025.109974\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Somatosensory stimulation foot orthoses (SSFO) are recommended to enhance postural balance by stimulating mechanoreceptors. However, the underlying mechanisms by which SSFO with varying protrusion designs influence postural balance remain unclear.</p><p><strong>Research question: </strong>How do SSFO affect postural balance in older adults, and what role do variations in protrusion design play in these effects?</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library from inception to December 2024. Eighteen studies with 27 SSFO conditions examining the effects on static and dynamic balance in older adults were included in the meta-analysis. Balance parameters reported in at least 10 SSFO conditions were further analyzed using meta-regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pooled analyses indicated that SSFO use reduced center of pressure (CoP) displacement during standing, particularly in studies evaluating immediate effects and using SSFO with specific design features. Meta-regression analysis revealed significant positive correlations between effect sizes for anteroposterior CoP range and SSFO with arch-support structures [Coeff: 0.45, 95 % CI (0.19, 0.72), p = 0.001] or site-specific protrusions [Coeff: 0.32, 95 % CI (0.09, 0.56), p = 0.008]. SSFO also significantly improved Timed Up and Go scores [MD= -1.15, 95 % CI (-1.82, -0.47), p < 0.001], while no significant changes were observed in gait or other functional mobility measures.</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>These findings underscore the potential of customized SSFO designs to enhance mechanoreceptor stimulation and improve postural balance in older adults. While design-specific SSFO may support improvements in static balance for clinical applications, evidence of benefits on gait and broader functional mobility is still limited.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>(PROSPERO ID: CRD42024592630).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94018,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gait & posture\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"109974\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gait & posture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2025.109974\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gait & posture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2025.109974","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:体感刺激足部矫形器(SSFO)被推荐通过刺激机械感受器来增强姿势平衡。然而,具有不同突出设计的SSFO影响体位平衡的潜在机制尚不清楚。研究问题:SSFO如何影响老年人的姿势平衡,以及在这些影响中突出设计的变化起什么作用?方法:系统检索PubMed、Web of Science、Scopus、CINAHL、Cochrane Library自成立至2024年12月的数据库。荟萃分析包括18项研究,27种SSFO条件,检查老年人静态和动态平衡的影响。使用meta-回归分析进一步分析至少10种SSFO条件下报告的平衡参数。结果:综合分析表明,SSFO可以减少站立时的压力中心(CoP)位移,特别是在评估即刻效果和使用具有特定设计特征的SSFO的研究中。meta回归分析显示,前后位CoP范围的效应大小与弓支撑结构的SSFO [Coeff: 0.45, 95 % CI (0.19, 0.72), p = 0.001]或部位特异性突出[Coeff: 0.32, 95 % CI (0.09, 0.56), p = 0.008]呈正相关。SSFO还显著改善了Timed Up和Go评分[MD= -1.15,95 % CI (-1.82, -0.47), p ]意义:这些发现强调了定制SSFO设计增强老年人机械受体刺激和改善姿势平衡的潜力。虽然特定设计的SSFO可能支持临床应用中静态平衡的改善,但对步态和更广泛的功能活动的益处证据仍然有限。注册:(普洛斯彼罗ID: CRD42024592630)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of somatosensory stimulation foot orthoses on balance and stability in older adults: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression.

Background: Somatosensory stimulation foot orthoses (SSFO) are recommended to enhance postural balance by stimulating mechanoreceptors. However, the underlying mechanisms by which SSFO with varying protrusion designs influence postural balance remain unclear.

Research question: How do SSFO affect postural balance in older adults, and what role do variations in protrusion design play in these effects?

Methods: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library from inception to December 2024. Eighteen studies with 27 SSFO conditions examining the effects on static and dynamic balance in older adults were included in the meta-analysis. Balance parameters reported in at least 10 SSFO conditions were further analyzed using meta-regression analysis.

Results: Pooled analyses indicated that SSFO use reduced center of pressure (CoP) displacement during standing, particularly in studies evaluating immediate effects and using SSFO with specific design features. Meta-regression analysis revealed significant positive correlations between effect sizes for anteroposterior CoP range and SSFO with arch-support structures [Coeff: 0.45, 95 % CI (0.19, 0.72), p = 0.001] or site-specific protrusions [Coeff: 0.32, 95 % CI (0.09, 0.56), p = 0.008]. SSFO also significantly improved Timed Up and Go scores [MD= -1.15, 95 % CI (-1.82, -0.47), p < 0.001], while no significant changes were observed in gait or other functional mobility measures.

Significance: These findings underscore the potential of customized SSFO designs to enhance mechanoreceptor stimulation and improve postural balance in older adults. While design-specific SSFO may support improvements in static balance for clinical applications, evidence of benefits on gait and broader functional mobility is still limited.

Registration: (PROSPERO ID: CRD42024592630).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信