宫腔镜峡部切除手术失败的危险因素是什么?

IF 1
Nurullah Peker, Abdurrahman Sengi, Talip Karacor, Serhat Ege, İImail Yildiz, Elif Agacayak, Mehmet Siddik Evsen
{"title":"宫腔镜峡部切除手术失败的危险因素是什么?","authors":"Nurullah Peker, Abdurrahman Sengi, Talip Karacor, Serhat Ege, İImail Yildiz, Elif Agacayak, Mehmet Siddik Evsen","doi":"10.5603/gpl.106814","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to present the postoperative results of patients who underwent a hysteroscopic isthmocele resection, identify factors affecting patients who experienced surgical failure, and develop a new treatment algorithm for managing an isthmoceles, whose treatment remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The hospital records of women who underwent hysteroscopic istmocele resection due to postmenstrual spot-bleeding at a tertiary central university hospital were examined. The patients were divided into two groups: successful surgery (Group 1) and unsuccessful surgery (Group 2) after hysteroscopic isthmocele resection. To evaluate the results of unsuccessful surgery in patients with failed hysteroscopic isthmocele resection, the number of caesarean sections, BMI and isthmocele area were considered as candidate predictors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the study period, 53 patients who met the inclusion criteria and underwent hysteroscopic isthmocele resection were evaluated. Surgical success was detected in 34 patients (64.1%), while unsuccessful surgery was detected in 19 patients (35.9%). In the ROC analysis performed to predict an unsuccessful surgery, AUC was detected as 0.717, sensitivity was 79%, specificity was 68% and p value was 0.009 in patients with a BMI > 27.5. In patients with previous caesarean sections, the number > 2.5; AUC was 0.765, sensitivity was 58%, specificity was 91% and p value was 0.002 in the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. In patients with isthmocele area > 23.5 mm², AUC was 0.781, sensitivity was 63%, specificity was 91% and p value was 0.001 in the ROC analysis. In the multivariate regression analysis, the effect of the isthmocele area in predicting unsuccessful surgery was determined to be a statistically significant independent variable [OR: 1.239, 95% CI (1.050-1.462), p = 0.011].</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although a hysteroscopic isthmocele resection is recommended for patients with an RMT over 3 mm, certain factors increase the risk of surgical failure. If an isthmocele area exceeds 23.5 mm², the number of previous caesarean sections is three or more or a person's BMI is 27.5 or higher, the risk of unsuccessful hysteroscopic surgery is high. In these patients, isthmocele repair should be performed via the laparoscopy, laparotomy or vaginal approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":94021,"journal":{"name":"Ginekologia polska","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What are the risk factors for unsuccessful surgery in hysteroscopic isthmocele resection?\",\"authors\":\"Nurullah Peker, Abdurrahman Sengi, Talip Karacor, Serhat Ege, İImail Yildiz, Elif Agacayak, Mehmet Siddik Evsen\",\"doi\":\"10.5603/gpl.106814\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to present the postoperative results of patients who underwent a hysteroscopic isthmocele resection, identify factors affecting patients who experienced surgical failure, and develop a new treatment algorithm for managing an isthmoceles, whose treatment remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The hospital records of women who underwent hysteroscopic istmocele resection due to postmenstrual spot-bleeding at a tertiary central university hospital were examined. The patients were divided into two groups: successful surgery (Group 1) and unsuccessful surgery (Group 2) after hysteroscopic isthmocele resection. To evaluate the results of unsuccessful surgery in patients with failed hysteroscopic isthmocele resection, the number of caesarean sections, BMI and isthmocele area were considered as candidate predictors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the study period, 53 patients who met the inclusion criteria and underwent hysteroscopic isthmocele resection were evaluated. Surgical success was detected in 34 patients (64.1%), while unsuccessful surgery was detected in 19 patients (35.9%). In the ROC analysis performed to predict an unsuccessful surgery, AUC was detected as 0.717, sensitivity was 79%, specificity was 68% and p value was 0.009 in patients with a BMI > 27.5. In patients with previous caesarean sections, the number > 2.5; AUC was 0.765, sensitivity was 58%, specificity was 91% and p value was 0.002 in the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. In patients with isthmocele area > 23.5 mm², AUC was 0.781, sensitivity was 63%, specificity was 91% and p value was 0.001 in the ROC analysis. In the multivariate regression analysis, the effect of the isthmocele area in predicting unsuccessful surgery was determined to be a statistically significant independent variable [OR: 1.239, 95% CI (1.050-1.462), p = 0.011].</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although a hysteroscopic isthmocele resection is recommended for patients with an RMT over 3 mm, certain factors increase the risk of surgical failure. If an isthmocele area exceeds 23.5 mm², the number of previous caesarean sections is three or more or a person's BMI is 27.5 or higher, the risk of unsuccessful hysteroscopic surgery is high. In these patients, isthmocele repair should be performed via the laparoscopy, laparotomy or vaginal approach.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94021,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ginekologia polska\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ginekologia polska\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5603/gpl.106814\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ginekologia polska","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5603/gpl.106814","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在介绍宫腔镜峡部囊肿切除术患者的术后结果,确定影响手术失败患者的因素,并开发一种新的治疗方法来治疗尚不明确的峡部囊肿。材料与方法:回顾性分析某三中医院因经后斑点出血行宫腔镜下子宫膨出切除术的病例。将患者分为宫腔镜峡部切除术后手术成功组(1组)和手术不成功组(2组)。为了评估宫腔镜峡部切除失败患者手术失败的结果,将剖宫产次数、BMI和峡部面积作为候选预测因素。结果:在研究期间,53例符合纳入标准并行宫腔镜峡部切除的患者被评估。手术成功34例(64.1%),手术失败19例(35.9%)。在预测手术不成功的ROC分析中,在BMI为27.5的患者中,AUC为0.717,敏感性为79%,特异性为68%,p值为0.009。在既往剖宫产患者中,数字> 2.5;受试者工作特征(ROC)分析的AUC为0.765,敏感性为58%,特异性为91%,p值为0.002。在峡部面积为23.5 mm²的患者中,ROC分析的AUC为0.781,敏感性为63%,特异性为91%,p值为0.001。在多变量回归分析中,峡部面积对预测手术不成功的影响被确定为具有统计学意义的自变量[OR: 1.239, 95% CI (1.050-1.462), p = 0.011]。结论:虽然对于RMT超过3mm的患者推荐宫腔镜峡部切除术,但某些因素会增加手术失败的风险。如果峡部面积超过23.5 mm²,以前的剖腹产次数为三次或更多,或者一个人的BMI为27.5或更高,宫腔镜手术失败的风险很高。在这些患者中,峡部修补应通过腹腔镜、剖腹或阴道入路进行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
What are the risk factors for unsuccessful surgery in hysteroscopic isthmocele resection?

Objectives: This study aims to present the postoperative results of patients who underwent a hysteroscopic isthmocele resection, identify factors affecting patients who experienced surgical failure, and develop a new treatment algorithm for managing an isthmoceles, whose treatment remains unclear.

Material and methods: The hospital records of women who underwent hysteroscopic istmocele resection due to postmenstrual spot-bleeding at a tertiary central university hospital were examined. The patients were divided into two groups: successful surgery (Group 1) and unsuccessful surgery (Group 2) after hysteroscopic isthmocele resection. To evaluate the results of unsuccessful surgery in patients with failed hysteroscopic isthmocele resection, the number of caesarean sections, BMI and isthmocele area were considered as candidate predictors.

Results: During the study period, 53 patients who met the inclusion criteria and underwent hysteroscopic isthmocele resection were evaluated. Surgical success was detected in 34 patients (64.1%), while unsuccessful surgery was detected in 19 patients (35.9%). In the ROC analysis performed to predict an unsuccessful surgery, AUC was detected as 0.717, sensitivity was 79%, specificity was 68% and p value was 0.009 in patients with a BMI > 27.5. In patients with previous caesarean sections, the number > 2.5; AUC was 0.765, sensitivity was 58%, specificity was 91% and p value was 0.002 in the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. In patients with isthmocele area > 23.5 mm², AUC was 0.781, sensitivity was 63%, specificity was 91% and p value was 0.001 in the ROC analysis. In the multivariate regression analysis, the effect of the isthmocele area in predicting unsuccessful surgery was determined to be a statistically significant independent variable [OR: 1.239, 95% CI (1.050-1.462), p = 0.011].

Conclusions: Although a hysteroscopic isthmocele resection is recommended for patients with an RMT over 3 mm, certain factors increase the risk of surgical failure. If an isthmocele area exceeds 23.5 mm², the number of previous caesarean sections is three or more or a person's BMI is 27.5 or higher, the risk of unsuccessful hysteroscopic surgery is high. In these patients, isthmocele repair should be performed via the laparoscopy, laparotomy or vaginal approach.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信