Nelly Raquel González-Arenas, Mariana Dinazar Chavez-Vargas, Hector Prado-Calleros, Juan Pablo Ramírez-Hinojosa, Fernando Martinez-Hernandez, Angélica Olivo-Díaz, Pablo Maravilla, Mirza Romero-Valdovinos, Guillermina Ávila-Ramírez
{"title":"墨西哥城某综合医院医护人员抗SARS-CoV-2的IgG、IgM和IgA滴度","authors":"Nelly Raquel González-Arenas, Mariana Dinazar Chavez-Vargas, Hector Prado-Calleros, Juan Pablo Ramírez-Hinojosa, Fernando Martinez-Hernandez, Angélica Olivo-Díaz, Pablo Maravilla, Mirza Romero-Valdovinos, Guillermina Ávila-Ramírez","doi":"10.3390/diseases13090276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of the present study was to better understand the antibody concentrations in healthcare workers (HCWs) from a hospital in Mexico City with a high density of COVID-19 patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Up to 243 HCWs were recruited in 2020 and 2022 and were sorted into three groups: hybrid immunity (HI, natural infection plus vaccination), vaccine-induced immunity (VI), and unvaccinated but RT-qPCR negative at the beginning of the pandemic (UV). Peripheral blood and nasopharyngeal swab samples were obtained; additionally, saliva samples were obtained from the UV group. The titers of IgG, IgM, and IgA against the SARS-CoV-2 receptor-binding domain (RBD) and nucleocapsid (NCP) proteins were assessed using an in-house ELISA, and positivity to the virus was determined via RT-qPCR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most HI and VI participants were positive for serum anti-RBD IgG (92.8% and 100%, respectively), while 26.6% (for HI) and 19% (for VI) were positive for anti-NCP IgG. Regarding serum anti-RBD IgA, the VI and HI groups had positive rates of 87.3% and 66%, respectively. In contrast, the UV group showed a rate of 5.7% but the positivity for IgA in saliva was higher (52% for RBD and 35% for NCP). In addition, the highest antibody titers were obtained for anti-RBD IgG and IgA in the HI and VI groups, respectively. In saliva, the IgA antibody titer was higher for the RBD antigen (1:1280).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results strengthen our understanding of antibody concentrations in HCWs during two critical years of the pandemic in a general hospital with many COVID-19 patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":72832,"journal":{"name":"Diseases (Basel, Switzerland)","volume":"13 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12468179/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Titers of IgG, IgM, and IgA Against SARS-CoV-2 in Healthcare Workers from a General Hospital in Mexico City.\",\"authors\":\"Nelly Raquel González-Arenas, Mariana Dinazar Chavez-Vargas, Hector Prado-Calleros, Juan Pablo Ramírez-Hinojosa, Fernando Martinez-Hernandez, Angélica Olivo-Díaz, Pablo Maravilla, Mirza Romero-Valdovinos, Guillermina Ávila-Ramírez\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/diseases13090276\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of the present study was to better understand the antibody concentrations in healthcare workers (HCWs) from a hospital in Mexico City with a high density of COVID-19 patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Up to 243 HCWs were recruited in 2020 and 2022 and were sorted into three groups: hybrid immunity (HI, natural infection plus vaccination), vaccine-induced immunity (VI), and unvaccinated but RT-qPCR negative at the beginning of the pandemic (UV). Peripheral blood and nasopharyngeal swab samples were obtained; additionally, saliva samples were obtained from the UV group. The titers of IgG, IgM, and IgA against the SARS-CoV-2 receptor-binding domain (RBD) and nucleocapsid (NCP) proteins were assessed using an in-house ELISA, and positivity to the virus was determined via RT-qPCR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most HI and VI participants were positive for serum anti-RBD IgG (92.8% and 100%, respectively), while 26.6% (for HI) and 19% (for VI) were positive for anti-NCP IgG. Regarding serum anti-RBD IgA, the VI and HI groups had positive rates of 87.3% and 66%, respectively. In contrast, the UV group showed a rate of 5.7% but the positivity for IgA in saliva was higher (52% for RBD and 35% for NCP). In addition, the highest antibody titers were obtained for anti-RBD IgG and IgA in the HI and VI groups, respectively. In saliva, the IgA antibody titer was higher for the RBD antigen (1:1280).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results strengthen our understanding of antibody concentrations in HCWs during two critical years of the pandemic in a general hospital with many COVID-19 patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72832,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diseases (Basel, Switzerland)\",\"volume\":\"13 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12468179/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diseases (Basel, Switzerland)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/diseases13090276\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diseases (Basel, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/diseases13090276","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Titers of IgG, IgM, and IgA Against SARS-CoV-2 in Healthcare Workers from a General Hospital in Mexico City.
Objectives: The aim of the present study was to better understand the antibody concentrations in healthcare workers (HCWs) from a hospital in Mexico City with a high density of COVID-19 patients.
Methods: Up to 243 HCWs were recruited in 2020 and 2022 and were sorted into three groups: hybrid immunity (HI, natural infection plus vaccination), vaccine-induced immunity (VI), and unvaccinated but RT-qPCR negative at the beginning of the pandemic (UV). Peripheral blood and nasopharyngeal swab samples were obtained; additionally, saliva samples were obtained from the UV group. The titers of IgG, IgM, and IgA against the SARS-CoV-2 receptor-binding domain (RBD) and nucleocapsid (NCP) proteins were assessed using an in-house ELISA, and positivity to the virus was determined via RT-qPCR.
Results: Most HI and VI participants were positive for serum anti-RBD IgG (92.8% and 100%, respectively), while 26.6% (for HI) and 19% (for VI) were positive for anti-NCP IgG. Regarding serum anti-RBD IgA, the VI and HI groups had positive rates of 87.3% and 66%, respectively. In contrast, the UV group showed a rate of 5.7% but the positivity for IgA in saliva was higher (52% for RBD and 35% for NCP). In addition, the highest antibody titers were obtained for anti-RBD IgG and IgA in the HI and VI groups, respectively. In saliva, the IgA antibody titer was higher for the RBD antigen (1:1280).
Conclusions: These results strengthen our understanding of antibody concentrations in HCWs during two critical years of the pandemic in a general hospital with many COVID-19 patients.