SaCo视觉喉罩与WORK喉罩在成人全麻腹腔镜手术中对气道管理效果及术后咽部不适的比较分析

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy Pub Date : 2025-09-20 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/RMHP.S539233
Fan Xing, Yang Yang
{"title":"SaCo视觉喉罩与WORK喉罩在成人全麻腹腔镜手术中对气道管理效果及术后咽部不适的比较分析","authors":"Fan Xing, Yang Yang","doi":"10.2147/RMHP.S539233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the application of the SaCo visual laryngeal mask and the WORK laryngeal mask in adult laparoscopic surgeries under general anesthesia, and to assess their effects on postoperative pharyngolaryngeal discomfort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 90 adult patients who underwent elective laparoscopic surgery under general anesthesia between June 2022 and April 2024. Based on the airway device used, patients were divided into the control group (n=45, WORK laryngeal mask) and the observation group (n=45, SaCo visual laryngeal mask). The two groups were compared in terms of laryngeal mask insertion parameters (seal pressure, insertion time, first-attempt success rate, number of adjustments >2 times, peak airway pressure, endoscopic visibility grading, positioning accuracy, removal time), vital signs (heart rate, mean arterial pressure), perioperative outcomes (post-extubation time, time to regular diet, postoperative hospital stay), VAS-based pharyngolaryngeal discomfort scores, and complication rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The observation group demonstrated significantly higher airway seal pressure at insertion, 1 hour, and 2 hours post-insertion (P<0.05). Adjustment rate >2 times was significantly lower, while positioning accuracy was significantly higher (P<0.05). No significant differences were found in heart rate or mean arterial pressure between groups. The observation group had significantly shorter post-extubation time, earlier diet resumption, and shorter hospital stays (P<0.05). Pharyngolaryngeal discomfort scores at 1, 3, and 7 days post-surgery were significantly lower in the observation group (P<0.05). The complication rate was also lower in the observation group (4.44%) than in the control group (20.00%) (P<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared to the WORK laryngeal mask, the SaCo visual laryngeal mask offers better sealing and placement accuracy, reduces pharyngolaryngeal discomfort, and promotes faster postoperative recovery with fewer complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":56009,"journal":{"name":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","volume":"18 ","pages":"3143-3151"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12459613/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparative Study of Airway Management Efficacy and Postoperative Pharyngolaryngeal Discomfort Using SaCo Visual and WORK Laryngeal Masks in Adult General Anesthesia Laparoscopic Surgery: A Retrospective Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Fan Xing, Yang Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/RMHP.S539233\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the application of the SaCo visual laryngeal mask and the WORK laryngeal mask in adult laparoscopic surgeries under general anesthesia, and to assess their effects on postoperative pharyngolaryngeal discomfort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 90 adult patients who underwent elective laparoscopic surgery under general anesthesia between June 2022 and April 2024. Based on the airway device used, patients were divided into the control group (n=45, WORK laryngeal mask) and the observation group (n=45, SaCo visual laryngeal mask). The two groups were compared in terms of laryngeal mask insertion parameters (seal pressure, insertion time, first-attempt success rate, number of adjustments >2 times, peak airway pressure, endoscopic visibility grading, positioning accuracy, removal time), vital signs (heart rate, mean arterial pressure), perioperative outcomes (post-extubation time, time to regular diet, postoperative hospital stay), VAS-based pharyngolaryngeal discomfort scores, and complication rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The observation group demonstrated significantly higher airway seal pressure at insertion, 1 hour, and 2 hours post-insertion (P<0.05). Adjustment rate >2 times was significantly lower, while positioning accuracy was significantly higher (P<0.05). No significant differences were found in heart rate or mean arterial pressure between groups. The observation group had significantly shorter post-extubation time, earlier diet resumption, and shorter hospital stays (P<0.05). Pharyngolaryngeal discomfort scores at 1, 3, and 7 days post-surgery were significantly lower in the observation group (P<0.05). The complication rate was also lower in the observation group (4.44%) than in the control group (20.00%) (P<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared to the WORK laryngeal mask, the SaCo visual laryngeal mask offers better sealing and placement accuracy, reduces pharyngolaryngeal discomfort, and promotes faster postoperative recovery with fewer complications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56009,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"3143-3151\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12459613/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S539233\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S539233","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较SaCo目视喉罩与WORK喉罩在成人腹腔镜手术全麻下的应用,并评价其对术后咽部不适的影响。方法:对2022年6月至2024年4月在全麻下行选择性腹腔镜手术的90例成人患者进行回顾性分析。根据使用的气道设备将患者分为对照组(n=45,使用WORK喉罩)和观察组(n=45,使用SaCo目视喉罩)。比较两组喉罩插入参数(密封压力、插入时间、首次尝试成功率、调整次数bbb20次、气道峰值压力、内窥镜能见度分级、定位准确性、取出时间)、生命体征(心率、平均动脉压)、围手术期结局(拔管后时间、正常饮食时间、术后住院时间)、基于vas的咽部不适评分、并发症发生率。结果:观察组患者在插入时、插入后1 h、2 h气道密封压力均显著增高(P2次显著降低,定位精度显著提高)。结论:与WORK喉罩相比,SaCo目视喉罩具有更好的密封和放置精度,减少咽部不适,术后恢复更快,并发症更少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Comparative Study of Airway Management Efficacy and Postoperative Pharyngolaryngeal Discomfort Using SaCo Visual and WORK Laryngeal Masks in Adult General Anesthesia Laparoscopic Surgery: A Retrospective Analysis.

Objective: To compare the application of the SaCo visual laryngeal mask and the WORK laryngeal mask in adult laparoscopic surgeries under general anesthesia, and to assess their effects on postoperative pharyngolaryngeal discomfort.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 90 adult patients who underwent elective laparoscopic surgery under general anesthesia between June 2022 and April 2024. Based on the airway device used, patients were divided into the control group (n=45, WORK laryngeal mask) and the observation group (n=45, SaCo visual laryngeal mask). The two groups were compared in terms of laryngeal mask insertion parameters (seal pressure, insertion time, first-attempt success rate, number of adjustments >2 times, peak airway pressure, endoscopic visibility grading, positioning accuracy, removal time), vital signs (heart rate, mean arterial pressure), perioperative outcomes (post-extubation time, time to regular diet, postoperative hospital stay), VAS-based pharyngolaryngeal discomfort scores, and complication rates.

Results: The observation group demonstrated significantly higher airway seal pressure at insertion, 1 hour, and 2 hours post-insertion (P<0.05). Adjustment rate >2 times was significantly lower, while positioning accuracy was significantly higher (P<0.05). No significant differences were found in heart rate or mean arterial pressure between groups. The observation group had significantly shorter post-extubation time, earlier diet resumption, and shorter hospital stays (P<0.05). Pharyngolaryngeal discomfort scores at 1, 3, and 7 days post-surgery were significantly lower in the observation group (P<0.05). The complication rate was also lower in the observation group (4.44%) than in the control group (20.00%) (P<0.05).

Conclusion: Compared to the WORK laryngeal mask, the SaCo visual laryngeal mask offers better sealing and placement accuracy, reduces pharyngolaryngeal discomfort, and promotes faster postoperative recovery with fewer complications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
2.90%
发文量
242
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Risk Management and Healthcare Policy is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on all aspects of public health, policy and preventative measures to promote good health and improve morbidity and mortality in the population. Specific topics covered in the journal include: Public and community health Policy and law Preventative and predictive healthcare Risk and hazard management Epidemiology, detection and screening Lifestyle and diet modification Vaccination and disease transmission/modification programs Health and safety and occupational health Healthcare services provision Health literacy and education Advertising and promotion of health issues Health economic evaluations and resource management Risk Management and Healthcare Policy focuses on human interventional and observational research. The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, clinical and epidemiological studies, reviews and evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, and extended reports. Case reports will only be considered if they make a valuable and original contribution to the literature. The journal does not accept study protocols, animal-based or cell line-based studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信