评估卫生保健工作者作为粪便微生物群移植的潜在粪便供体:抗微生物肠道细菌和肠病原微生物的横断面研究

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
María Bonilla-Moreno, Catalina Medina-Gómez, Daiana Guevara-Núñez, Lucía Saiz-Escobedo, Sara Martí, M Ángeles Domínguez, Anna Carrera-Salinas, Graciela Rodríguez-Sevilla
{"title":"评估卫生保健工作者作为粪便微生物群移植的潜在粪便供体:抗微生物肠道细菌和肠病原微生物的横断面研究","authors":"María Bonilla-Moreno, Catalina Medina-Gómez, Daiana Guevara-Núñez, Lucía Saiz-Escobedo, Sara Martí, M Ángeles Domínguez, Anna Carrera-Salinas, Graciela Rodríguez-Sevilla","doi":"10.1016/j.jhin.2025.09.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Faecal Microbiota Transplantation (FMT) is a procedure designed to modulate the gut microbiome, but identifying reliable stool donors remains challenging. We conducted a study at Bellvitge University Hospital to assess the prevalence of enteropathogenic microorganisms (EPs) and antimicrobial-resistant (AMR) gut bacteria among healthcare workers (HCWs) and evaluate their potential as stool donors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From November 2022 to April 2023, 106 HCWs were enrolled. Stool samples were tested for a range of EPs using real-time PCR and conventional methods, while AMR gut bacteria were screened using selective culture media. 16SrRNA sequencing was performed, and alpha-diversity was assessed using the Shannon index.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>EPs were found in 48.1% of samples (51/106), with protozoa being the most prevalent (37.7%, 40/106), followed by bacteria (10.4%, 11/106) and viruses (4.7%, 5/106). Blastocystis hominis (33%, 35/106) and Dientamoeba fragilis (18.8%, 20/106) were the most common protozoa, while Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli was the most frequent bacterial pathogen (3.8%, 4/106). Extended spectrum β-lactamase-producing E. coli was found in 2.8% of samples (3/106). Carbapenemase-producing bacteria, vancomycin-resistant enterococci, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus or Clostridioides difficile were not present in any sample. HCWs with B. hominis had significantly higher Shannon alpha-diversity than those without (p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The prevalence of EPs and AMR gut bacteria among HCWs supports the inclusion of HCWs as potential stool donors for FMT, provided they meet health and screening criteria. This approach could help address the shortage of suitable stool donors for FMT programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":54806,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hospital Infection","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing healthcare workers as potential stool donors for faecal microbiota transplantation: a cross-sectional study of antimicrobial-resistant gut bacteria and enteropathogenic microorganisms.\",\"authors\":\"María Bonilla-Moreno, Catalina Medina-Gómez, Daiana Guevara-Núñez, Lucía Saiz-Escobedo, Sara Martí, M Ángeles Domínguez, Anna Carrera-Salinas, Graciela Rodríguez-Sevilla\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jhin.2025.09.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Faecal Microbiota Transplantation (FMT) is a procedure designed to modulate the gut microbiome, but identifying reliable stool donors remains challenging. We conducted a study at Bellvitge University Hospital to assess the prevalence of enteropathogenic microorganisms (EPs) and antimicrobial-resistant (AMR) gut bacteria among healthcare workers (HCWs) and evaluate their potential as stool donors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From November 2022 to April 2023, 106 HCWs were enrolled. Stool samples were tested for a range of EPs using real-time PCR and conventional methods, while AMR gut bacteria were screened using selective culture media. 16SrRNA sequencing was performed, and alpha-diversity was assessed using the Shannon index.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>EPs were found in 48.1% of samples (51/106), with protozoa being the most prevalent (37.7%, 40/106), followed by bacteria (10.4%, 11/106) and viruses (4.7%, 5/106). Blastocystis hominis (33%, 35/106) and Dientamoeba fragilis (18.8%, 20/106) were the most common protozoa, while Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli was the most frequent bacterial pathogen (3.8%, 4/106). Extended spectrum β-lactamase-producing E. coli was found in 2.8% of samples (3/106). Carbapenemase-producing bacteria, vancomycin-resistant enterococci, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus or Clostridioides difficile were not present in any sample. HCWs with B. hominis had significantly higher Shannon alpha-diversity than those without (p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The prevalence of EPs and AMR gut bacteria among HCWs supports the inclusion of HCWs as potential stool donors for FMT, provided they meet health and screening criteria. This approach could help address the shortage of suitable stool donors for FMT programs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54806,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hospital Infection\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hospital Infection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2025.09.004\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hospital Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2025.09.004","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:粪便微生物群移植(FMT)是一种旨在调节肠道微生物群的手术,但确定可靠的粪便供体仍然具有挑战性。我们在Bellvitge大学医院进行了一项研究,以评估卫生保健工作者(HCWs)中肠病原微生物(EPs)和抗菌素耐药(AMR)肠道细菌的患病率,并评估他们作为粪便捐赠者的潜力。方法:于2022年11月至2023年4月对106名卫生保健员进行调查。使用实时PCR和常规方法检测粪便样本的EPs范围,同时使用选择性培养基筛选AMR肠道细菌。进行16SrRNA测序,并使用Shannon指数评估α -多样性。结果:有48.1%(51/106)的标本检出EPs,其中原生动物最多(37.7%,40/106),其次是细菌(10.4%,11/106)和病毒(4.7%,5/106)。最常见的原生动物是人芽囊虫(33%,35/106)和脆弱地阿米巴(18.8%,20/106),最常见的细菌病原体是肠致病性大肠杆菌(3.8%,4/106)。产β-内酰胺酶的大肠杆菌在2.8%(3/106)的样品中检出。产碳青霉烯酶细菌、耐万古霉素肠球菌、耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌或艰难梭菌均未出现在任何样品中。有人源双歧杆菌的HCWs Shannon α多样性显著高于无人源双歧杆菌的HCWs (p < 0.01)。结论:在符合健康和筛查标准的卫生工作者中,EPs和AMR肠道细菌的流行支持将卫生工作者作为FMT的潜在粪便供体。这种方法可以帮助解决FMT项目中合适的粪便捐赠者短缺的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing healthcare workers as potential stool donors for faecal microbiota transplantation: a cross-sectional study of antimicrobial-resistant gut bacteria and enteropathogenic microorganisms.

Background: Faecal Microbiota Transplantation (FMT) is a procedure designed to modulate the gut microbiome, but identifying reliable stool donors remains challenging. We conducted a study at Bellvitge University Hospital to assess the prevalence of enteropathogenic microorganisms (EPs) and antimicrobial-resistant (AMR) gut bacteria among healthcare workers (HCWs) and evaluate their potential as stool donors.

Methods: From November 2022 to April 2023, 106 HCWs were enrolled. Stool samples were tested for a range of EPs using real-time PCR and conventional methods, while AMR gut bacteria were screened using selective culture media. 16SrRNA sequencing was performed, and alpha-diversity was assessed using the Shannon index.

Findings: EPs were found in 48.1% of samples (51/106), with protozoa being the most prevalent (37.7%, 40/106), followed by bacteria (10.4%, 11/106) and viruses (4.7%, 5/106). Blastocystis hominis (33%, 35/106) and Dientamoeba fragilis (18.8%, 20/106) were the most common protozoa, while Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli was the most frequent bacterial pathogen (3.8%, 4/106). Extended spectrum β-lactamase-producing E. coli was found in 2.8% of samples (3/106). Carbapenemase-producing bacteria, vancomycin-resistant enterococci, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus or Clostridioides difficile were not present in any sample. HCWs with B. hominis had significantly higher Shannon alpha-diversity than those without (p < 0.01).

Conclusion: The prevalence of EPs and AMR gut bacteria among HCWs supports the inclusion of HCWs as potential stool donors for FMT, provided they meet health and screening criteria. This approach could help address the shortage of suitable stool donors for FMT programs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Hospital Infection
Journal of Hospital Infection 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
5.80%
发文量
271
审稿时长
19 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hospital Infection is the editorially independent scientific publication of the Healthcare Infection Society. The aim of the Journal is to publish high quality research and information relating to infection prevention and control that is relevant to an international audience. The Journal welcomes submissions that relate to all aspects of infection prevention and control in healthcare settings. This includes submissions that: provide new insight into the epidemiology, surveillance, or prevention and control of healthcare-associated infections and antimicrobial resistance in healthcare settings; provide new insight into cleaning, disinfection and decontamination; provide new insight into the design of healthcare premises; describe novel aspects of outbreaks of infection; throw light on techniques for effective antimicrobial stewardship; describe novel techniques (laboratory-based or point of care) for the detection of infection or antimicrobial resistance in the healthcare setting, particularly if these can be used to facilitate infection prevention and control; improve understanding of the motivations of safe healthcare behaviour, or describe techniques for achieving behavioural and cultural change; improve understanding of the use of IT systems in infection surveillance and prevention and control.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信