单腿着地时足弓支撑垫刚度对下肢生物力学的影响。

IF 2.9 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES
Sports Pub Date : 2025-09-11 DOI:10.3390/sports13090323
Chu-Hao Li, Qiu-Qiong Shi, Kit-Lun Yick, Ming-Yu Hu, Shi-Wei Mo
{"title":"单腿着地时足弓支撑垫刚度对下肢生物力学的影响。","authors":"Chu-Hao Li, Qiu-Qiong Shi, Kit-Lun Yick, Ming-Yu Hu, Shi-Wei Mo","doi":"10.3390/sports13090323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Arch structure is a crucial interface between the human body and the ground during landing tasks, but the biomechanical effects of arch support stiffness remain insufficiently explored. This study examines the effects of arch supports with different stiffnesses on lower-limb biomechanics during landing. Twelve male participants (six normal arches, six flat feet) performed a single-leg drop landing from a 45 cm height under four arch support conditions: no arch support pad (NAP), soft-stiffness arch support pad (SAP), medium-stiffness arch support pad (MAP), and high-stiffness arch support pad (HAP). Dominant lower-limb joint angles and moments in the sagittal plane and vertical ground reaction force (vGRF)-related parameters-time to peak vGRF, peak vGRF, and max loading rate-were recorded using a motion capture system and force plate. Data were analyzed using one-way repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA). Arch pad stiffness significantly affected ankle and knee kinematics. The NAP condition exhibited significantly higher ankle plantarflexion at initial contact (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.01), as well as larger range of motion (ROM) of the knee (<i>p</i> = 0.03) and hip (<i>p</i> < 0.01), compared to the use of a SAP or MAP. The use of a HAP resulted in a significantly lower peak ankle dorsiflexion moment and larger peak knee flexion angle than the other conditions (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.04). The peak knee extension moment was the highest when using a NAP, and was significantly higher than that shown with the use of a MAP or HAP (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.02). No significant differences were observed in hip joint moments or vGRF-related parameters across conditions (<i>p</i> ≥ 0.52). These results indicate that hard-stiffness arch support pads modulate lower-limb mechanics during landing, potentially enhancing shock absorption and reducing knee loading.</p>","PeriodicalId":53303,"journal":{"name":"Sports","volume":"13 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12473336/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Arch Support Pad Stiffness on Lower-Limb Biomechanics During Single-Leg Landing.\",\"authors\":\"Chu-Hao Li, Qiu-Qiong Shi, Kit-Lun Yick, Ming-Yu Hu, Shi-Wei Mo\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/sports13090323\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Arch structure is a crucial interface between the human body and the ground during landing tasks, but the biomechanical effects of arch support stiffness remain insufficiently explored. This study examines the effects of arch supports with different stiffnesses on lower-limb biomechanics during landing. Twelve male participants (six normal arches, six flat feet) performed a single-leg drop landing from a 45 cm height under four arch support conditions: no arch support pad (NAP), soft-stiffness arch support pad (SAP), medium-stiffness arch support pad (MAP), and high-stiffness arch support pad (HAP). Dominant lower-limb joint angles and moments in the sagittal plane and vertical ground reaction force (vGRF)-related parameters-time to peak vGRF, peak vGRF, and max loading rate-were recorded using a motion capture system and force plate. Data were analyzed using one-way repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA). Arch pad stiffness significantly affected ankle and knee kinematics. The NAP condition exhibited significantly higher ankle plantarflexion at initial contact (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.01), as well as larger range of motion (ROM) of the knee (<i>p</i> = 0.03) and hip (<i>p</i> < 0.01), compared to the use of a SAP or MAP. The use of a HAP resulted in a significantly lower peak ankle dorsiflexion moment and larger peak knee flexion angle than the other conditions (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.04). The peak knee extension moment was the highest when using a NAP, and was significantly higher than that shown with the use of a MAP or HAP (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.02). No significant differences were observed in hip joint moments or vGRF-related parameters across conditions (<i>p</i> ≥ 0.52). These results indicate that hard-stiffness arch support pads modulate lower-limb mechanics during landing, potentially enhancing shock absorption and reducing knee loading.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53303,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sports\",\"volume\":\"13 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12473336/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/sports13090323\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/sports13090323","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在着陆任务中,足弓结构是人体与地面之间的重要界面,但足弓支撑刚度的生物力学效应尚未得到充分的研究。本研究考察了不同刚度的足弓支撑对着地过程中下肢生物力学的影响。12名男性参与者(6个正常足弓,6个平足)在无足弓支撑垫(NAP)、软刚度足弓支撑垫(SAP)、中刚度足弓支撑垫(MAP)和高刚度足弓支撑垫(HAP)四种足弓支撑条件下,从45厘米高进行单腿落地。利用运动捕捉系统和测力板记录下肢主要关节角和矢状面力矩以及垂直地反力(vGRF)相关参数——vGRF峰值时间、vGRF峰值时间和最大加载率。数据分析采用单因素重复测量方差分析(ANOVA)。足弓垫刚度显著影响踝关节和膝关节的运动学。与使用SAP或MAP相比,NAP在初始接触时表现出更高的踝关节跖屈曲(p≤0.01),以及更大的膝关节运动范围(p = 0.03)和髋关节(p < 0.01)。使用HAP组踝关节背屈力矩峰值明显低于其他组(p≤0.04),膝关节背屈角峰值明显大于其他组(p≤0.04)。使用NAP时膝关节伸展力矩峰值最高,显著高于MAP和HAP组(p≤0.02)。不同条件下髋关节力矩或vgrf相关参数无显著差异(p≥0.52)。这些结果表明,硬刚度弓支撑垫在着陆过程中调节下肢力学,可能增强减震并减少膝关节负荷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Effects of Arch Support Pad Stiffness on Lower-Limb Biomechanics During Single-Leg Landing.

Effects of Arch Support Pad Stiffness on Lower-Limb Biomechanics During Single-Leg Landing.

Effects of Arch Support Pad Stiffness on Lower-Limb Biomechanics During Single-Leg Landing.

Arch structure is a crucial interface between the human body and the ground during landing tasks, but the biomechanical effects of arch support stiffness remain insufficiently explored. This study examines the effects of arch supports with different stiffnesses on lower-limb biomechanics during landing. Twelve male participants (six normal arches, six flat feet) performed a single-leg drop landing from a 45 cm height under four arch support conditions: no arch support pad (NAP), soft-stiffness arch support pad (SAP), medium-stiffness arch support pad (MAP), and high-stiffness arch support pad (HAP). Dominant lower-limb joint angles and moments in the sagittal plane and vertical ground reaction force (vGRF)-related parameters-time to peak vGRF, peak vGRF, and max loading rate-were recorded using a motion capture system and force plate. Data were analyzed using one-way repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA). Arch pad stiffness significantly affected ankle and knee kinematics. The NAP condition exhibited significantly higher ankle plantarflexion at initial contact (p ≤ 0.01), as well as larger range of motion (ROM) of the knee (p = 0.03) and hip (p < 0.01), compared to the use of a SAP or MAP. The use of a HAP resulted in a significantly lower peak ankle dorsiflexion moment and larger peak knee flexion angle than the other conditions (p ≤ 0.04). The peak knee extension moment was the highest when using a NAP, and was significantly higher than that shown with the use of a MAP or HAP (p ≤ 0.02). No significant differences were observed in hip joint moments or vGRF-related parameters across conditions (p ≥ 0.52). These results indicate that hard-stiffness arch support pads modulate lower-limb mechanics during landing, potentially enhancing shock absorption and reducing knee loading.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sports
Sports SPORT SCIENCES-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
7.40%
发文量
167
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信