Guodong Song, Guangbin Wang, Leping Li, Liang Shang, Shuai Duan, Zhenzhen Wang, Yubo Liu
{"title":"缩小视场扩散加权磁共振成像检测早期胃癌:与MDCT和fFOV DWI诊断性能比较的初步研究。","authors":"Guodong Song, Guangbin Wang, Leping Li, Liang Shang, Shuai Duan, Zhenzhen Wang, Yubo Liu","doi":"10.2174/0115734056390767250917221319","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Early detection of gastric cancer remains challenging for many of the current imaging techniques. Recent advancements in reduced field-of-view (rFOV) diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) have shown promise in improving the visualization of small anatomical structures. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the diagnostic performance of rFOV DWI with multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) and conventional full field of view (fFOV) DWI for detecting early gastric cancer (EGC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 43 patients with pathologically confirmed EGC. All participants underwent pre-treatment imaging, including CT scans and MRI with a prototype rFOV DWI and conventional fFOV DWI at 3 Tesla. Quantitative (signal-to-noise ratio [SNR], contrast-to-noise ratio [CNR]) and qualitative (subjective image quality) assessments were performed. Diagnostic performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and area-under-the-curve (AUC) analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>rFOV DWI demonstrated significantly higher SNR and CNR compared with fFOV DWI (P < 0.05). Subjective image quality scores were also superior for rFOV DWI (P < 0.05). In lesion detection, rFOV DWI showed higher sensitivity (0.705) than CT (0.636) and fFOV DWI (0.523). ROC analysis revealed that rFOV DWI had a higher AUC (0.829, 95% CI [0.764, 0.882]) than fFOV DWI (0.734, 95% CI [0.661, 0.798], P = 0.02) and a modest improvement over CT (0.799, 95% CI [0.731, 0.856], P = 0.51).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The findings suggest that rFOV DWI provides superior image quality and diagnostic accuracy for EGC detection compared with conventional fFOV DWI. While it showed a trend toward better performance than CT, further studies with larger cohorts are needed to validate these results.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>rFOV DWI offers improved image quality and diagnostic performance for early gastric cancer detection compared with fFOV DWI, with a potential advantage over CT. This technique may enhance early diagnosis and clinical decision-making in gastric cancer management.</p>","PeriodicalId":54215,"journal":{"name":"Current Medical Imaging Reviews","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reduced Field-of-view Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Detecting Early Gastric Cancer: A Pilot Study Comparing Diagnostic Performance with MDCT and fFOV DWI.\",\"authors\":\"Guodong Song, Guangbin Wang, Leping Li, Liang Shang, Shuai Duan, Zhenzhen Wang, Yubo Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/0115734056390767250917221319\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Early detection of gastric cancer remains challenging for many of the current imaging techniques. Recent advancements in reduced field-of-view (rFOV) diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) have shown promise in improving the visualization of small anatomical structures. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the diagnostic performance of rFOV DWI with multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) and conventional full field of view (fFOV) DWI for detecting early gastric cancer (EGC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 43 patients with pathologically confirmed EGC. All participants underwent pre-treatment imaging, including CT scans and MRI with a prototype rFOV DWI and conventional fFOV DWI at 3 Tesla. Quantitative (signal-to-noise ratio [SNR], contrast-to-noise ratio [CNR]) and qualitative (subjective image quality) assessments were performed. Diagnostic performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and area-under-the-curve (AUC) analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>rFOV DWI demonstrated significantly higher SNR and CNR compared with fFOV DWI (P < 0.05). Subjective image quality scores were also superior for rFOV DWI (P < 0.05). In lesion detection, rFOV DWI showed higher sensitivity (0.705) than CT (0.636) and fFOV DWI (0.523). ROC analysis revealed that rFOV DWI had a higher AUC (0.829, 95% CI [0.764, 0.882]) than fFOV DWI (0.734, 95% CI [0.661, 0.798], P = 0.02) and a modest improvement over CT (0.799, 95% CI [0.731, 0.856], P = 0.51).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The findings suggest that rFOV DWI provides superior image quality and diagnostic accuracy for EGC detection compared with conventional fFOV DWI. While it showed a trend toward better performance than CT, further studies with larger cohorts are needed to validate these results.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>rFOV DWI offers improved image quality and diagnostic performance for early gastric cancer detection compared with fFOV DWI, with a potential advantage over CT. This technique may enhance early diagnosis and clinical decision-making in gastric cancer management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54215,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Medical Imaging Reviews\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Medical Imaging Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/0115734056390767250917221319\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Medical Imaging Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0115734056390767250917221319","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Reduced Field-of-view Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Detecting Early Gastric Cancer: A Pilot Study Comparing Diagnostic Performance with MDCT and fFOV DWI.
Introduction: Early detection of gastric cancer remains challenging for many of the current imaging techniques. Recent advancements in reduced field-of-view (rFOV) diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) have shown promise in improving the visualization of small anatomical structures. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the diagnostic performance of rFOV DWI with multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) and conventional full field of view (fFOV) DWI for detecting early gastric cancer (EGC).
Methods: This retrospective study included 43 patients with pathologically confirmed EGC. All participants underwent pre-treatment imaging, including CT scans and MRI with a prototype rFOV DWI and conventional fFOV DWI at 3 Tesla. Quantitative (signal-to-noise ratio [SNR], contrast-to-noise ratio [CNR]) and qualitative (subjective image quality) assessments were performed. Diagnostic performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and area-under-the-curve (AUC) analysis.
Results: rFOV DWI demonstrated significantly higher SNR and CNR compared with fFOV DWI (P < 0.05). Subjective image quality scores were also superior for rFOV DWI (P < 0.05). In lesion detection, rFOV DWI showed higher sensitivity (0.705) than CT (0.636) and fFOV DWI (0.523). ROC analysis revealed that rFOV DWI had a higher AUC (0.829, 95% CI [0.764, 0.882]) than fFOV DWI (0.734, 95% CI [0.661, 0.798], P = 0.02) and a modest improvement over CT (0.799, 95% CI [0.731, 0.856], P = 0.51).
Discussion: The findings suggest that rFOV DWI provides superior image quality and diagnostic accuracy for EGC detection compared with conventional fFOV DWI. While it showed a trend toward better performance than CT, further studies with larger cohorts are needed to validate these results.
Conclusion: rFOV DWI offers improved image quality and diagnostic performance for early gastric cancer detection compared with fFOV DWI, with a potential advantage over CT. This technique may enhance early diagnosis and clinical decision-making in gastric cancer management.
期刊介绍:
Current Medical Imaging Reviews publishes frontier review articles, original research articles, drug clinical trial studies and guest edited thematic issues on all the latest advances on medical imaging dedicated to clinical research. All relevant areas are covered by the journal, including advances in the diagnosis, instrumentation and therapeutic applications related to all modern medical imaging techniques.
The journal is essential reading for all clinicians and researchers involved in medical imaging and diagnosis.