新生儿以个人和家庭为中心的护理:确定现有定义、护理模式和相关干预措施类别的范围审查。

IF 4.3 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Andrea Togo, Ornella Lincetto, Jenny Bua, Ilaria Mariani, Marzia Lazzerini
{"title":"新生儿以个人和家庭为中心的护理:确定现有定义、护理模式和相关干预措施类别的范围审查。","authors":"Andrea Togo, Ornella Lincetto, Jenny Bua, Ilaria Mariani, Marzia Lazzerini","doi":"10.7189/jogh.15.04263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Person- and family-centred care in the field of neonatology (N&FCC) are promoted by many international agencies and scientific societies because of evidence-based benefits for infants, parents and health systems; however, being very broad and evolving concepts, they have not been uniformly defined in operational terms. We conducted a scoping review of literature relevant to N&FCC with the objectives of synthetising: 1) existing definitions; 2) models of care; 3) categories of interventions suggested by each model of care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Google Scholar for articles and/or grey literature published until 5 February 2024. For each objective, we considered articles and/or other documents, for any type of newborn.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The searches yielded 10 771 records. A total of 91 documents were deemed eligible for inclusion. We identified 40 relevant definitions and 28 different models of care of N&FCC. Both definitions and models of care were categorised in four macro-groups, based on their main focus: newborn and developmental care, parental participation to care, no separation between mother-baby, and miscellanea. Out of the 28 models of care, a total of 51 categories of interventions were identified, with a variable number (range 2-17) reported per each model. These were grouped in five macro-categories: individualised neonatal health care; organisation of care, human resources and policies; physical resources; health professionals (HPs) capacity strengthening and support; family empowerment and support. While most models included individualised neonatal care and family empowerment interventions, HPs were frequently neglected as beneficiaries of the intervention: only 11 models incorporated HPs capacity strengthening, only three proposed a wider support for HPs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We identified and synthetised numerous definitions, models, and categories of interventions, highlighting the need for further conceptualisation and standardisation around the concept of N&FCC, including the perspective from low-middle income countries', and from both parents and staff involved in care.</p>","PeriodicalId":48734,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Global Health","volume":"15 ","pages":"04263"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12464611/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Person- and family-centred care in neonatology: a scoping review to identify existing definitions, models of care, and related categories of interventions.\",\"authors\":\"Andrea Togo, Ornella Lincetto, Jenny Bua, Ilaria Mariani, Marzia Lazzerini\",\"doi\":\"10.7189/jogh.15.04263\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Person- and family-centred care in the field of neonatology (N&FCC) are promoted by many international agencies and scientific societies because of evidence-based benefits for infants, parents and health systems; however, being very broad and evolving concepts, they have not been uniformly defined in operational terms. We conducted a scoping review of literature relevant to N&FCC with the objectives of synthetising: 1) existing definitions; 2) models of care; 3) categories of interventions suggested by each model of care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Google Scholar for articles and/or grey literature published until 5 February 2024. For each objective, we considered articles and/or other documents, for any type of newborn.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The searches yielded 10 771 records. A total of 91 documents were deemed eligible for inclusion. We identified 40 relevant definitions and 28 different models of care of N&FCC. Both definitions and models of care were categorised in four macro-groups, based on their main focus: newborn and developmental care, parental participation to care, no separation between mother-baby, and miscellanea. Out of the 28 models of care, a total of 51 categories of interventions were identified, with a variable number (range 2-17) reported per each model. These were grouped in five macro-categories: individualised neonatal health care; organisation of care, human resources and policies; physical resources; health professionals (HPs) capacity strengthening and support; family empowerment and support. While most models included individualised neonatal care and family empowerment interventions, HPs were frequently neglected as beneficiaries of the intervention: only 11 models incorporated HPs capacity strengthening, only three proposed a wider support for HPs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We identified and synthetised numerous definitions, models, and categories of interventions, highlighting the need for further conceptualisation and standardisation around the concept of N&FCC, including the perspective from low-middle income countries', and from both parents and staff involved in care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48734,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Global Health\",\"volume\":\"15 \",\"pages\":\"04263\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12464611/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Global Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.15.04263\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.15.04263","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:新生儿领域以个人和家庭为中心的护理(N&FCC)受到许多国际机构和科学学会的推广,因为它对婴儿、父母和卫生系统有循证益处;然而,它们是非常广泛和不断发展的概念,在操作术语中没有统一定义。我们对与N&FCC相关的文献进行了范围综述,目的是综合:1)现有定义;2)护理模式;3)每种护理模式建议的干预措施类别。方法:检索PubMed/MEDLINE、Embase、Web of Science和谷歌Scholar,检索2024年2月5日前发表的文章和/或灰色文献。对于每个目标,我们考虑了任何类型新生儿的文章和/或其他文件。结果:搜索得到10 771条记录。共有91份文件被认为有资格纳入。我们确定了40个相关定义和28个不同的N&FCC护理模型。根据其主要关注点,护理的定义和模式分为四个宏观组:新生儿和发育护理、父母参与护理、母婴不分离和杂项。在28种护理模式中,共确定了51种干预措施,每种模式报告了不同的数量(范围2-17)。这些被分为五个宏观类别:个性化新生儿保健;组织护理、人力资源和政策;物理资源;加强和支持卫生专业人员的能力;家庭赋权和支持。虽然大多数模型都包括个性化的新生儿护理和家庭赋权干预措施,但hp往往被忽视为干预措施的受益者:只有11个模型纳入了hp能力加强,只有3个模型提出了对hp的更广泛支持。结论:我们确定并综合了许多干预措施的定义、模型和类别,强调了围绕N&FCC概念进一步概念化和标准化的必要性,包括中低收入国家的观点,以及参与护理的父母和工作人员的观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Person- and family-centred care in neonatology: a scoping review to identify existing definitions, models of care, and related categories of interventions.

Person- and family-centred care in neonatology: a scoping review to identify existing definitions, models of care, and related categories of interventions.

Person- and family-centred care in neonatology: a scoping review to identify existing definitions, models of care, and related categories of interventions.

Person- and family-centred care in neonatology: a scoping review to identify existing definitions, models of care, and related categories of interventions.

Background: Person- and family-centred care in the field of neonatology (N&FCC) are promoted by many international agencies and scientific societies because of evidence-based benefits for infants, parents and health systems; however, being very broad and evolving concepts, they have not been uniformly defined in operational terms. We conducted a scoping review of literature relevant to N&FCC with the objectives of synthetising: 1) existing definitions; 2) models of care; 3) categories of interventions suggested by each model of care.

Methods: We searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Google Scholar for articles and/or grey literature published until 5 February 2024. For each objective, we considered articles and/or other documents, for any type of newborn.

Results: The searches yielded 10 771 records. A total of 91 documents were deemed eligible for inclusion. We identified 40 relevant definitions and 28 different models of care of N&FCC. Both definitions and models of care were categorised in four macro-groups, based on their main focus: newborn and developmental care, parental participation to care, no separation between mother-baby, and miscellanea. Out of the 28 models of care, a total of 51 categories of interventions were identified, with a variable number (range 2-17) reported per each model. These were grouped in five macro-categories: individualised neonatal health care; organisation of care, human resources and policies; physical resources; health professionals (HPs) capacity strengthening and support; family empowerment and support. While most models included individualised neonatal care and family empowerment interventions, HPs were frequently neglected as beneficiaries of the intervention: only 11 models incorporated HPs capacity strengthening, only three proposed a wider support for HPs.

Conclusions: We identified and synthetised numerous definitions, models, and categories of interventions, highlighting the need for further conceptualisation and standardisation around the concept of N&FCC, including the perspective from low-middle income countries', and from both parents and staff involved in care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Global Health
Journal of Global Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH -
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.80%
发文量
240
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Global Health is a peer-reviewed journal published by the Edinburgh University Global Health Society, a not-for-profit organization registered in the UK. We publish editorials, news, viewpoints, original research and review articles in two issues per year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信