沙特阿拉伯医生和护士在临床实践中整合人工智能的伦理和实践考虑:一项横断面研究。

IF 2 Q1 NURSING
Abdulaziz Rashed Alsaedi, Maisam Elfaki Haddad, Roaa Matouq Khinkar, Sumayyah Mohammed Alsharif, Anhar Abdelwahab Elbashir, Ahlam Ali Alghamdi
{"title":"沙特阿拉伯医生和护士在临床实践中整合人工智能的伦理和实践考虑:一项横断面研究。","authors":"Abdulaziz Rashed Alsaedi, Maisam Elfaki Haddad, Roaa Matouq Khinkar, Sumayyah Mohammed Alsharif, Anhar Abdelwahab Elbashir, Ahlam Ali Alghamdi","doi":"10.3390/nursrep15090309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: The emergence of artificial intelligence (AI) has revolutionized the healthcare industry. However, its integration into clinical practices raises ethical and practical concerns. This study aims to explore ethical and practical considerations perceived by physicians and nurses in Saudi Arabia. <b>Methods</b>: It employed a cross-sectional design with 400 physicians and nurses, using a pre-established online questionnaire. Descriptive data were analyzed through means and standard deviations, while inferential statistics were performed using the independent samples <i>t</i>-test. <b>Results</b>: Most participants were male (57%) and physicians (73.8%), with most employed in governmental organizations (87%). The participants' use and awareness of AI was low, as 34.0% said they had never used it, but 74.5% of respondents were willing to use AI in clinical practices. Also, 80.5% of participants were aware of the AI benefits, and 71.0% had background knowledge about the ethical concerns related to AI's implementation in their clinical practices. Moreover, (62.0%) of respondents recognized the applicability of AI in their specialty. Key findings revealed significant concerns: participants perceived a lack of skills to effectively utilize AI in clinical practice (mean = 4.04) and security risks such as AI manipulation or hacking (mean = 3.83). The most pressing ethical challenges included AI's potential incompatibility with all populations and cultural norms (mean = 3.90) and uncertainty regarding responsibility for AI-related errors (mean = 3.84). <b>Conclusions</b>: These findings highlight substantial barriers that hinder the effective integration of AI in clinical practices in Saudi Arabia. Addressing these challenges requires leadership support, specific training initiatives, and developing practical strategies tailored to the local context. Future research should include other healthcare professionals and qualitatively explore further underlying factors influencing AI adoption.</p>","PeriodicalId":40753,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Reports","volume":"15 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12472769/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ethical and Practical Considerations of Physicians and Nurses on Integrating Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Practices in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study.\",\"authors\":\"Abdulaziz Rashed Alsaedi, Maisam Elfaki Haddad, Roaa Matouq Khinkar, Sumayyah Mohammed Alsharif, Anhar Abdelwahab Elbashir, Ahlam Ali Alghamdi\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/nursrep15090309\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: The emergence of artificial intelligence (AI) has revolutionized the healthcare industry. However, its integration into clinical practices raises ethical and practical concerns. This study aims to explore ethical and practical considerations perceived by physicians and nurses in Saudi Arabia. <b>Methods</b>: It employed a cross-sectional design with 400 physicians and nurses, using a pre-established online questionnaire. Descriptive data were analyzed through means and standard deviations, while inferential statistics were performed using the independent samples <i>t</i>-test. <b>Results</b>: Most participants were male (57%) and physicians (73.8%), with most employed in governmental organizations (87%). The participants' use and awareness of AI was low, as 34.0% said they had never used it, but 74.5% of respondents were willing to use AI in clinical practices. Also, 80.5% of participants were aware of the AI benefits, and 71.0% had background knowledge about the ethical concerns related to AI's implementation in their clinical practices. Moreover, (62.0%) of respondents recognized the applicability of AI in their specialty. Key findings revealed significant concerns: participants perceived a lack of skills to effectively utilize AI in clinical practice (mean = 4.04) and security risks such as AI manipulation or hacking (mean = 3.83). The most pressing ethical challenges included AI's potential incompatibility with all populations and cultural norms (mean = 3.90) and uncertainty regarding responsibility for AI-related errors (mean = 3.84). <b>Conclusions</b>: These findings highlight substantial barriers that hinder the effective integration of AI in clinical practices in Saudi Arabia. Addressing these challenges requires leadership support, specific training initiatives, and developing practical strategies tailored to the local context. Future research should include other healthcare professionals and qualitatively explore further underlying factors influencing AI adoption.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":40753,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nursing Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12472769/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nursing Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep15090309\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep15090309","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:人工智能(AI)的出现彻底改变了医疗行业。然而,将其整合到临床实践中会引起伦理和实践方面的关注。本研究旨在探讨沙特阿拉伯的医生和护士所认为的道德和实际考虑因素。方法:采用横断面设计,400名医生和护士,使用预先设置的在线问卷。描述性资料采用均值和标准差分析,推论统计采用独立样本t检验。结果:大多数参与者是男性(57%)和医生(73.8%),其中大多数在政府机构工作(87%)。受访者对人工智能的使用和认知度较低,34.0%的受访者表示从未使用过人工智能,但74.5%的受访者愿意在临床实践中使用人工智能。此外,80.5%的参与者意识到人工智能的好处,71.0%的参与者对在临床实践中实施人工智能的伦理问题有背景知识。此外,62.0%的受访者认识到人工智能在其专业领域的适用性。主要调查结果揭示了严重的担忧:参与者认为缺乏在临床实践中有效利用人工智能的技能(平均= 4.04),以及人工智能操纵或黑客攻击等安全风险(平均= 3.83)。最紧迫的伦理挑战包括人工智能与所有人群和文化规范的潜在不兼容性(平均= 3.90)以及人工智能相关错误责任的不确定性(平均= 3.84)。结论:这些发现突出了阻碍人工智能在沙特阿拉伯临床实践中有效整合的实质性障碍。应对这些挑战需要领导的支持,具体的培训计划,并根据当地情况制定切实可行的战略。未来的研究应该包括其他医疗保健专业人员,并定性地进一步探索影响人工智能采用的潜在因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ethical and Practical Considerations of Physicians and Nurses on Integrating Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Practices in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Background/Objectives: The emergence of artificial intelligence (AI) has revolutionized the healthcare industry. However, its integration into clinical practices raises ethical and practical concerns. This study aims to explore ethical and practical considerations perceived by physicians and nurses in Saudi Arabia. Methods: It employed a cross-sectional design with 400 physicians and nurses, using a pre-established online questionnaire. Descriptive data were analyzed through means and standard deviations, while inferential statistics were performed using the independent samples t-test. Results: Most participants were male (57%) and physicians (73.8%), with most employed in governmental organizations (87%). The participants' use and awareness of AI was low, as 34.0% said they had never used it, but 74.5% of respondents were willing to use AI in clinical practices. Also, 80.5% of participants were aware of the AI benefits, and 71.0% had background knowledge about the ethical concerns related to AI's implementation in their clinical practices. Moreover, (62.0%) of respondents recognized the applicability of AI in their specialty. Key findings revealed significant concerns: participants perceived a lack of skills to effectively utilize AI in clinical practice (mean = 4.04) and security risks such as AI manipulation or hacking (mean = 3.83). The most pressing ethical challenges included AI's potential incompatibility with all populations and cultural norms (mean = 3.90) and uncertainty regarding responsibility for AI-related errors (mean = 3.84). Conclusions: These findings highlight substantial barriers that hinder the effective integration of AI in clinical practices in Saudi Arabia. Addressing these challenges requires leadership support, specific training initiatives, and developing practical strategies tailored to the local context. Future research should include other healthcare professionals and qualitatively explore further underlying factors influencing AI adoption.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nursing Reports
Nursing Reports NURSING-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
4.20%
发文量
78
期刊介绍: Nursing Reports is an open access, peer-reviewed, online-only journal that aims to influence the art and science of nursing by making rigorously conducted research accessible and understood to the full spectrum of practicing nurses, academics, educators and interested members of the public. The journal represents an exhilarating opportunity to make a unique and significant contribution to nursing and the wider community by addressing topics, theories and issues that concern the whole field of Nursing Science, including research, practice, policy and education. The primary intent of the journal is to present scientifically sound and influential empirical and theoretical studies, critical reviews and open debates to the global community of nurses. Short reports, opinions and insight into the plight of nurses the world-over will provide a voice for those of all cultures, governments and perspectives. The emphasis of Nursing Reports will be on ensuring that the highest quality of evidence and contribution is made available to the greatest number of nurses. Nursing Reports aims to make original, evidence-based, peer-reviewed research available to the global community of nurses and to interested members of the public. In addition, reviews of the literature, open debates on professional issues and short reports from around the world are invited to contribute to our vibrant and dynamic journal. All published work will adhere to the most stringent ethical standards and journalistic principles of fairness, worth and credibility. Our journal publishes Editorials, Original Articles, Review articles, Critical Debates, Short Reports from Around the Globe and Letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信