Joon Suk Moon, Hyung Seok Park, Ji Young You, Kwan Ho Lee, Sae Byul Lee, Ku Sang Kim, Ho Yong Park, Byeongju Kang, Jeeyeon Lee
{"title":"机器人辅助乳房手术的术中并发症及预防策略。","authors":"Joon Suk Moon, Hyung Seok Park, Ji Young You, Kwan Ho Lee, Sae Byul Lee, Ku Sang Kim, Ho Yong Park, Byeongju Kang, Jeeyeon Lee","doi":"10.1007/s11701-025-02822-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Robot-assisted breast surgery (RAS) improves cosmetic outcomes, but poses anatomical challenges-such as limited working space and lack of tactile feedback-that may increase intraoperative complication risk. To investigate the types and frequencies of intraoperative complications in RAS and assess preventive strategies employed by robotic breast surgeons based on their clinical experience, this Web-based survey was distributed to members of the Korea Robot-Endoscopy Minimal Access Breast Surgery Study Group. Twenty-six breast surgeons actively performing RAS responded to the questionnaire. The ten-item questionnaire was used to obtain data on surgeon demographics, RAS experience, intraoperative complications, and preventive strategies. The primary outcome was the prevalence of intraoperative complications; secondary outcomes included associations with surgeon experience and preventive strategies used. Among the 26 respondents, 80.8% (n = 21) reported at least one intraoperative complication during RAS. Patient-related complications included skin injury, brachial plexus palsy, incomplete breast tissue resection, and iatrogenic pneumothorax. Technical issues included CO₂ leakage and mechanical failure. All surgeons with > 50 cumulative RAS cases reported complications, whereas those with ≤ 20 cases reported none. This is the first study to systematically document intraoperative complications and preventive strategies in RAS in Korea. These findings offer valuable insights into complication patterns and practical prevention strategies that may inform surgical training, standardize practice, and improve patient safety in RAS.</p>","PeriodicalId":47616,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","volume":"19 1","pages":"633"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intraoperative complications and prevention strategies in robot-assisted breast surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Joon Suk Moon, Hyung Seok Park, Ji Young You, Kwan Ho Lee, Sae Byul Lee, Ku Sang Kim, Ho Yong Park, Byeongju Kang, Jeeyeon Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11701-025-02822-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Robot-assisted breast surgery (RAS) improves cosmetic outcomes, but poses anatomical challenges-such as limited working space and lack of tactile feedback-that may increase intraoperative complication risk. To investigate the types and frequencies of intraoperative complications in RAS and assess preventive strategies employed by robotic breast surgeons based on their clinical experience, this Web-based survey was distributed to members of the Korea Robot-Endoscopy Minimal Access Breast Surgery Study Group. Twenty-six breast surgeons actively performing RAS responded to the questionnaire. The ten-item questionnaire was used to obtain data on surgeon demographics, RAS experience, intraoperative complications, and preventive strategies. The primary outcome was the prevalence of intraoperative complications; secondary outcomes included associations with surgeon experience and preventive strategies used. Among the 26 respondents, 80.8% (n = 21) reported at least one intraoperative complication during RAS. Patient-related complications included skin injury, brachial plexus palsy, incomplete breast tissue resection, and iatrogenic pneumothorax. Technical issues included CO₂ leakage and mechanical failure. All surgeons with > 50 cumulative RAS cases reported complications, whereas those with ≤ 20 cases reported none. This is the first study to systematically document intraoperative complications and preventive strategies in RAS in Korea. These findings offer valuable insights into complication patterns and practical prevention strategies that may inform surgical training, standardize practice, and improve patient safety in RAS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47616,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Robotic Surgery\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"633\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Robotic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-025-02822-3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-025-02822-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Intraoperative complications and prevention strategies in robot-assisted breast surgery.
Robot-assisted breast surgery (RAS) improves cosmetic outcomes, but poses anatomical challenges-such as limited working space and lack of tactile feedback-that may increase intraoperative complication risk. To investigate the types and frequencies of intraoperative complications in RAS and assess preventive strategies employed by robotic breast surgeons based on their clinical experience, this Web-based survey was distributed to members of the Korea Robot-Endoscopy Minimal Access Breast Surgery Study Group. Twenty-six breast surgeons actively performing RAS responded to the questionnaire. The ten-item questionnaire was used to obtain data on surgeon demographics, RAS experience, intraoperative complications, and preventive strategies. The primary outcome was the prevalence of intraoperative complications; secondary outcomes included associations with surgeon experience and preventive strategies used. Among the 26 respondents, 80.8% (n = 21) reported at least one intraoperative complication during RAS. Patient-related complications included skin injury, brachial plexus palsy, incomplete breast tissue resection, and iatrogenic pneumothorax. Technical issues included CO₂ leakage and mechanical failure. All surgeons with > 50 cumulative RAS cases reported complications, whereas those with ≤ 20 cases reported none. This is the first study to systematically document intraoperative complications and preventive strategies in RAS in Korea. These findings offer valuable insights into complication patterns and practical prevention strategies that may inform surgical training, standardize practice, and improve patient safety in RAS.
期刊介绍:
The aim of the Journal of Robotic Surgery is to become the leading worldwide journal for publication of articles related to robotic surgery, encompassing surgical simulation and integrated imaging techniques. The journal provides a centralized, focused resource for physicians wishing to publish their experience or those wishing to avail themselves of the most up-to-date findings.The journal reports on advance in a wide range of surgical specialties including adult and pediatric urology, general surgery, cardiac surgery, gynecology, ENT, orthopedics and neurosurgery.The use of robotics in surgery is broad-based and will undoubtedly expand over the next decade as new technical innovations and techniques increase the applicability of its use. The journal intends to capture this trend as it develops.