pressp - rtms:一种基于生物标志物的个性化重复经颅磁刺激治疗上肢运动障碍卒中患者的处方。

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Gabriel Barreto, Rhayssa Albuquerque, Camilla Santos, Rodrigo Brito, Patrícia Lopes, Maria Das Graças Rodrigues de Araújo, Kátia Monte-Silva
{"title":"pressp - rtms:一种基于生物标志物的个性化重复经颅磁刺激治疗上肢运动障碍卒中患者的处方。","authors":"Gabriel Barreto, Rhayssa Albuquerque, Camilla Santos, Rodrigo Brito, Patrícia Lopes, Maria Das Graças Rodrigues de Araújo, Kátia Monte-Silva","doi":"10.1080/10749357.2025.2563224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a promising noninvasive treatment for upper extremity motor impairment in people with stroke. However, response variability underscores the need for tools to support more personalized and effective rTMS planning.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Implement a biomarker-based PREScription for personalized rTMS (PRESp-rTMS) in stroke patients with upper extremity motor impairment and verify its effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this randomized, triple-blind, single-center trial, 20 people with stroke, aged 18-80 years and presenting upper extremity motor impairment, were enrolled and assigned to either a control group receiving standard low-frequency rTMS (s-rTMS) on the non-lesioned hemisphere or a personalized rTMS (p-rTMS) group guided by the PRESp-rTMS algorithm, based on neurophysiological and clinical biomarkers. The p-rTMS group received one of four protocols, each targeting specific frequencies on a single or both hemispheres. The primary outcome was the mean difference in the Fugl-Meyer Assessment for the Upper Extremity (ΔFMA-UE). Secondary outcomes included the Functional Independence Measure, Box and Block Test, Trunk Control Test, and Modified Ashworth Scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to the s-rTMS group (ΔFMA-UE = 4.9 ± 1.4; mean ± SD), the p-rTMS group demonstrated a larger improvement in upper extremity motor impairment (ΔFMA-UE = 11.8 ± 2.9; <i>p</i> < 0.01; Cohen's D = 3.2, 95% CI = 2.15-3.90). No significant differences were found for secondary outcomes, although very large effect sizes favored the p-rTMS group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Using the PRESp-rTMS algorithm results in greater improvements in upper extremity motor impairment in people with stroke compared to the standard rTMS protocol.</p>","PeriodicalId":23164,"journal":{"name":"Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PRESp-rTMS: a biomarker-based PREScription for personalized repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for stroke patients with upper extremity motor impairment.\",\"authors\":\"Gabriel Barreto, Rhayssa Albuquerque, Camilla Santos, Rodrigo Brito, Patrícia Lopes, Maria Das Graças Rodrigues de Araújo, Kátia Monte-Silva\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10749357.2025.2563224\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a promising noninvasive treatment for upper extremity motor impairment in people with stroke. However, response variability underscores the need for tools to support more personalized and effective rTMS planning.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Implement a biomarker-based PREScription for personalized rTMS (PRESp-rTMS) in stroke patients with upper extremity motor impairment and verify its effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this randomized, triple-blind, single-center trial, 20 people with stroke, aged 18-80 years and presenting upper extremity motor impairment, were enrolled and assigned to either a control group receiving standard low-frequency rTMS (s-rTMS) on the non-lesioned hemisphere or a personalized rTMS (p-rTMS) group guided by the PRESp-rTMS algorithm, based on neurophysiological and clinical biomarkers. The p-rTMS group received one of four protocols, each targeting specific frequencies on a single or both hemispheres. The primary outcome was the mean difference in the Fugl-Meyer Assessment for the Upper Extremity (ΔFMA-UE). Secondary outcomes included the Functional Independence Measure, Box and Block Test, Trunk Control Test, and Modified Ashworth Scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to the s-rTMS group (ΔFMA-UE = 4.9 ± 1.4; mean ± SD), the p-rTMS group demonstrated a larger improvement in upper extremity motor impairment (ΔFMA-UE = 11.8 ± 2.9; <i>p</i> < 0.01; Cohen's D = 3.2, 95% CI = 2.15-3.90). No significant differences were found for secondary outcomes, although very large effect sizes favored the p-rTMS group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Using the PRESp-rTMS algorithm results in greater improvements in upper extremity motor impairment in people with stroke compared to the standard rTMS protocol.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23164,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-15\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10749357.2025.2563224\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10749357.2025.2563224","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)是一种很有前途的无创治疗中风患者上肢运动障碍的方法。然而,响应的可变性强调需要工具来支持更个性化和有效的rTMS规划。目的:在脑卒中上肢运动障碍患者中实施基于生物标志物的个性化rTMS处方(PRESp-rTMS)并验证其有效性。方法:在这项随机、三盲、单中心试验中,20名年龄在18-80岁、上肢运动障碍的中风患者被纳入研究,并被分配到接受标准低频rTMS (s-rTMS)的对照组和基于神经生理和临床生物标志物的PRESp-rTMS算法指导的个性化rTMS (p-rTMS)组。p-rTMS组接受了四种方案中的一种,每种方案针对单个或两个半球的特定频率。主要结果是Fugl-Meyer上肢评估的平均差异(ΔFMA-UE)。次要结果包括功能独立性测试、盒块测试、主干控制测试和修正Ashworth量表。结果:与s-rTMS组相比(ΔFMA-UE = 4.9±1.4;mean±SD), p-rTMS组在上肢运动障碍方面表现出更大的改善(ΔFMA-UE = 11.8±2.9;p)结论:与标准rTMS方案相比,使用PRESp-rTMS算法对卒中患者上肢运动障碍的改善更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
PRESp-rTMS: a biomarker-based PREScription for personalized repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for stroke patients with upper extremity motor impairment.

Background: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a promising noninvasive treatment for upper extremity motor impairment in people with stroke. However, response variability underscores the need for tools to support more personalized and effective rTMS planning.

Objectives: Implement a biomarker-based PREScription for personalized rTMS (PRESp-rTMS) in stroke patients with upper extremity motor impairment and verify its effectiveness.

Methods: In this randomized, triple-blind, single-center trial, 20 people with stroke, aged 18-80 years and presenting upper extremity motor impairment, were enrolled and assigned to either a control group receiving standard low-frequency rTMS (s-rTMS) on the non-lesioned hemisphere or a personalized rTMS (p-rTMS) group guided by the PRESp-rTMS algorithm, based on neurophysiological and clinical biomarkers. The p-rTMS group received one of four protocols, each targeting specific frequencies on a single or both hemispheres. The primary outcome was the mean difference in the Fugl-Meyer Assessment for the Upper Extremity (ΔFMA-UE). Secondary outcomes included the Functional Independence Measure, Box and Block Test, Trunk Control Test, and Modified Ashworth Scale.

Results: Compared to the s-rTMS group (ΔFMA-UE = 4.9 ± 1.4; mean ± SD), the p-rTMS group demonstrated a larger improvement in upper extremity motor impairment (ΔFMA-UE = 11.8 ± 2.9; p < 0.01; Cohen's D = 3.2, 95% CI = 2.15-3.90). No significant differences were found for secondary outcomes, although very large effect sizes favored the p-rTMS group.

Conclusions: Using the PRESp-rTMS algorithm results in greater improvements in upper extremity motor impairment in people with stroke compared to the standard rTMS protocol.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation
Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.50%
发文量
57
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation is the leading journal devoted to the study and dissemination of interdisciplinary, evidence-based, clinical information related to stroke rehabilitation. The journal’s scope covers physical medicine and rehabilitation, neurology, neurorehabilitation, neural engineering and therapeutics, neuropsychology and cognition, optimization of the rehabilitation system, robotics and biomechanics, pain management, nursing, physical therapy, cardiopulmonary fitness, mobility, occupational therapy, speech pathology and communication. There is a particular focus on stroke recovery, improving rehabilitation outcomes, quality of life, activities of daily living, motor control, family and care givers, and community issues. The journal reviews and reports clinical practices, clinical trials, state-of-the-art concepts, and new developments in stroke research and patient care. Both primary research papers, reviews of existing literature, and invited editorials, are included. Sharply-focused, single-issue topics, and the latest in clinical research, provide in-depth knowledge.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信