基于理论的护士师徒关系调查的发展与心理测量学评价。

IF 2 Q1 NURSING
Leonie DeClerk, Brian Parks
{"title":"基于理论的护士师徒关系调查的发展与心理测量学评价。","authors":"Leonie DeClerk, Brian Parks","doi":"10.3390/nursrep15090338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: Preceptorship is a key aspect of clinical education for healthcare professions, including nurse practitioners (NP). Numerous studies have explored barriers and facilitators to preceptorship; however, few have used a theory-based, psychometrically sound instrument. The aim of this study was to develop and validate an instrument predicting nurse practitioner preceptorship based on the <i>Integrated Behavioral Model (IBM)</i>. <b>Methods</b>: This was an instrument validation study with a longitudinal design. A pool of 82 statements that reflected constructs of the <i>IBM</i> was developed from the existing literature and unpublished studies. Items were evaluated for clarity and construct validity by 20 faculty members and NPs. Further refinement after administration to a small sample of NPs yielded a 60-item Likert-type survey that was sent to NPs in 20 states. A total of 154 NPs repeated the survey after 2-4 weeks to evaluate test-retest reliability. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis were used to establish subscales and assess internal consistency, convergent, and discriminant validity. <b>Results</b>: 35 items were retained in the final survey. We identified 10 subscales reflecting constructs in the <i>IBM.</i> All subscales had adequate internal consistency and discriminant validity. One subscale had inadequate convergent validity and test-retest reliability, while another subscale had inadequate content validity. <b>Conclusions</b>: The resultant <i>Predicting Preceptorship Survey</i> is theory-based and psychometrically sound. There is no subscale for one <i>IBM</i> construct, \"salience.\" This instrument could be used in studies of engagement in preceptorship in order to identify focus areas for interventions to increase the availability of preceptors, and to evaluate the outcomes of those interventions. Future research should include longitudinal studies of preceptorship and validation of the instrument with other professions, in other countries, and in other cultures.</p>","PeriodicalId":40753,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Reports","volume":"15 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12472875/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and Psychometric Evaluation of a Theory-Based Preceptorship Survey for Nurse Practitioners.\",\"authors\":\"Leonie DeClerk, Brian Parks\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/nursrep15090338\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: Preceptorship is a key aspect of clinical education for healthcare professions, including nurse practitioners (NP). Numerous studies have explored barriers and facilitators to preceptorship; however, few have used a theory-based, psychometrically sound instrument. The aim of this study was to develop and validate an instrument predicting nurse practitioner preceptorship based on the <i>Integrated Behavioral Model (IBM)</i>. <b>Methods</b>: This was an instrument validation study with a longitudinal design. A pool of 82 statements that reflected constructs of the <i>IBM</i> was developed from the existing literature and unpublished studies. Items were evaluated for clarity and construct validity by 20 faculty members and NPs. Further refinement after administration to a small sample of NPs yielded a 60-item Likert-type survey that was sent to NPs in 20 states. A total of 154 NPs repeated the survey after 2-4 weeks to evaluate test-retest reliability. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis were used to establish subscales and assess internal consistency, convergent, and discriminant validity. <b>Results</b>: 35 items were retained in the final survey. We identified 10 subscales reflecting constructs in the <i>IBM.</i> All subscales had adequate internal consistency and discriminant validity. One subscale had inadequate convergent validity and test-retest reliability, while another subscale had inadequate content validity. <b>Conclusions</b>: The resultant <i>Predicting Preceptorship Survey</i> is theory-based and psychometrically sound. There is no subscale for one <i>IBM</i> construct, \\\"salience.\\\" This instrument could be used in studies of engagement in preceptorship in order to identify focus areas for interventions to increase the availability of preceptors, and to evaluate the outcomes of those interventions. Future research should include longitudinal studies of preceptorship and validation of the instrument with other professions, in other countries, and in other cultures.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":40753,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nursing Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12472875/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nursing Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep15090338\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep15090338","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:导师制是医疗保健专业临床教育的一个关键方面,包括护士从业人员(NP)。许多研究都探讨了导师关系的障碍和促进因素;然而,很少有人使用基于理论的、心理测量学上可靠的工具。本研究的目的是开发和验证一种基于综合行为模型(IBM)的预测护士执业师从的工具。方法:采用纵向设计进行器械验证研究。从现有文献和未发表的研究中开发了反映IBM结构的82个语句池。由20名教师和NPs评估项目的清晰度和结构效度。在对小样本的NPs进行管理后,进一步完善了一份60项的李克特式调查,该调查被发送给20个州的NPs。共有154名np在2-4周后重复调查以评估重测信度。探索性和验证性因子分析用于建立子量表并评估内部一致性,收敛性和判别效度。结果:最终问卷保留35项。我们确定了反映IBM结构的10个子量表。各分量表具有足够的内部一致性和判别效度。一个子量表的收敛效度和重测信度不足,另一个子量表的内容效度不足。结论:预测警觉性调查具有理论基础和心理测量学上的合理性。IBM的一个构造“突出性”没有子尺度。这一工具可用于对参与指导的研究,以确定干预的重点领域,增加指导的可得性,并评价这些干预的结果。未来的研究应包括对其他国家和其他文化的其他专业的指导和仪器验证的纵向研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development and Psychometric Evaluation of a Theory-Based Preceptorship Survey for Nurse Practitioners.

Background/Objectives: Preceptorship is a key aspect of clinical education for healthcare professions, including nurse practitioners (NP). Numerous studies have explored barriers and facilitators to preceptorship; however, few have used a theory-based, psychometrically sound instrument. The aim of this study was to develop and validate an instrument predicting nurse practitioner preceptorship based on the Integrated Behavioral Model (IBM). Methods: This was an instrument validation study with a longitudinal design. A pool of 82 statements that reflected constructs of the IBM was developed from the existing literature and unpublished studies. Items were evaluated for clarity and construct validity by 20 faculty members and NPs. Further refinement after administration to a small sample of NPs yielded a 60-item Likert-type survey that was sent to NPs in 20 states. A total of 154 NPs repeated the survey after 2-4 weeks to evaluate test-retest reliability. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis were used to establish subscales and assess internal consistency, convergent, and discriminant validity. Results: 35 items were retained in the final survey. We identified 10 subscales reflecting constructs in the IBM. All subscales had adequate internal consistency and discriminant validity. One subscale had inadequate convergent validity and test-retest reliability, while another subscale had inadequate content validity. Conclusions: The resultant Predicting Preceptorship Survey is theory-based and psychometrically sound. There is no subscale for one IBM construct, "salience." This instrument could be used in studies of engagement in preceptorship in order to identify focus areas for interventions to increase the availability of preceptors, and to evaluate the outcomes of those interventions. Future research should include longitudinal studies of preceptorship and validation of the instrument with other professions, in other countries, and in other cultures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nursing Reports
Nursing Reports NURSING-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
4.20%
发文量
78
期刊介绍: Nursing Reports is an open access, peer-reviewed, online-only journal that aims to influence the art and science of nursing by making rigorously conducted research accessible and understood to the full spectrum of practicing nurses, academics, educators and interested members of the public. The journal represents an exhilarating opportunity to make a unique and significant contribution to nursing and the wider community by addressing topics, theories and issues that concern the whole field of Nursing Science, including research, practice, policy and education. The primary intent of the journal is to present scientifically sound and influential empirical and theoretical studies, critical reviews and open debates to the global community of nurses. Short reports, opinions and insight into the plight of nurses the world-over will provide a voice for those of all cultures, governments and perspectives. The emphasis of Nursing Reports will be on ensuring that the highest quality of evidence and contribution is made available to the greatest number of nurses. Nursing Reports aims to make original, evidence-based, peer-reviewed research available to the global community of nurses and to interested members of the public. In addition, reviews of the literature, open debates on professional issues and short reports from around the world are invited to contribute to our vibrant and dynamic journal. All published work will adhere to the most stringent ethical standards and journalistic principles of fairness, worth and credibility. Our journal publishes Editorials, Original Articles, Review articles, Critical Debates, Short Reports from Around the Globe and Letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信