{"title":"基于理论的护士师徒关系调查的发展与心理测量学评价。","authors":"Leonie DeClerk, Brian Parks","doi":"10.3390/nursrep15090338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: Preceptorship is a key aspect of clinical education for healthcare professions, including nurse practitioners (NP). Numerous studies have explored barriers and facilitators to preceptorship; however, few have used a theory-based, psychometrically sound instrument. The aim of this study was to develop and validate an instrument predicting nurse practitioner preceptorship based on the <i>Integrated Behavioral Model (IBM)</i>. <b>Methods</b>: This was an instrument validation study with a longitudinal design. A pool of 82 statements that reflected constructs of the <i>IBM</i> was developed from the existing literature and unpublished studies. Items were evaluated for clarity and construct validity by 20 faculty members and NPs. Further refinement after administration to a small sample of NPs yielded a 60-item Likert-type survey that was sent to NPs in 20 states. A total of 154 NPs repeated the survey after 2-4 weeks to evaluate test-retest reliability. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis were used to establish subscales and assess internal consistency, convergent, and discriminant validity. <b>Results</b>: 35 items were retained in the final survey. We identified 10 subscales reflecting constructs in the <i>IBM.</i> All subscales had adequate internal consistency and discriminant validity. One subscale had inadequate convergent validity and test-retest reliability, while another subscale had inadequate content validity. <b>Conclusions</b>: The resultant <i>Predicting Preceptorship Survey</i> is theory-based and psychometrically sound. There is no subscale for one <i>IBM</i> construct, \"salience.\" This instrument could be used in studies of engagement in preceptorship in order to identify focus areas for interventions to increase the availability of preceptors, and to evaluate the outcomes of those interventions. Future research should include longitudinal studies of preceptorship and validation of the instrument with other professions, in other countries, and in other cultures.</p>","PeriodicalId":40753,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Reports","volume":"15 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12472875/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and Psychometric Evaluation of a Theory-Based Preceptorship Survey for Nurse Practitioners.\",\"authors\":\"Leonie DeClerk, Brian Parks\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/nursrep15090338\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: Preceptorship is a key aspect of clinical education for healthcare professions, including nurse practitioners (NP). Numerous studies have explored barriers and facilitators to preceptorship; however, few have used a theory-based, psychometrically sound instrument. The aim of this study was to develop and validate an instrument predicting nurse practitioner preceptorship based on the <i>Integrated Behavioral Model (IBM)</i>. <b>Methods</b>: This was an instrument validation study with a longitudinal design. A pool of 82 statements that reflected constructs of the <i>IBM</i> was developed from the existing literature and unpublished studies. Items were evaluated for clarity and construct validity by 20 faculty members and NPs. Further refinement after administration to a small sample of NPs yielded a 60-item Likert-type survey that was sent to NPs in 20 states. A total of 154 NPs repeated the survey after 2-4 weeks to evaluate test-retest reliability. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis were used to establish subscales and assess internal consistency, convergent, and discriminant validity. <b>Results</b>: 35 items were retained in the final survey. We identified 10 subscales reflecting constructs in the <i>IBM.</i> All subscales had adequate internal consistency and discriminant validity. One subscale had inadequate convergent validity and test-retest reliability, while another subscale had inadequate content validity. <b>Conclusions</b>: The resultant <i>Predicting Preceptorship Survey</i> is theory-based and psychometrically sound. There is no subscale for one <i>IBM</i> construct, \\\"salience.\\\" This instrument could be used in studies of engagement in preceptorship in order to identify focus areas for interventions to increase the availability of preceptors, and to evaluate the outcomes of those interventions. Future research should include longitudinal studies of preceptorship and validation of the instrument with other professions, in other countries, and in other cultures.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":40753,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nursing Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12472875/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nursing Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep15090338\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep15090338","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Development and Psychometric Evaluation of a Theory-Based Preceptorship Survey for Nurse Practitioners.
Background/Objectives: Preceptorship is a key aspect of clinical education for healthcare professions, including nurse practitioners (NP). Numerous studies have explored barriers and facilitators to preceptorship; however, few have used a theory-based, psychometrically sound instrument. The aim of this study was to develop and validate an instrument predicting nurse practitioner preceptorship based on the Integrated Behavioral Model (IBM). Methods: This was an instrument validation study with a longitudinal design. A pool of 82 statements that reflected constructs of the IBM was developed from the existing literature and unpublished studies. Items were evaluated for clarity and construct validity by 20 faculty members and NPs. Further refinement after administration to a small sample of NPs yielded a 60-item Likert-type survey that was sent to NPs in 20 states. A total of 154 NPs repeated the survey after 2-4 weeks to evaluate test-retest reliability. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis were used to establish subscales and assess internal consistency, convergent, and discriminant validity. Results: 35 items were retained in the final survey. We identified 10 subscales reflecting constructs in the IBM. All subscales had adequate internal consistency and discriminant validity. One subscale had inadequate convergent validity and test-retest reliability, while another subscale had inadequate content validity. Conclusions: The resultant Predicting Preceptorship Survey is theory-based and psychometrically sound. There is no subscale for one IBM construct, "salience." This instrument could be used in studies of engagement in preceptorship in order to identify focus areas for interventions to increase the availability of preceptors, and to evaluate the outcomes of those interventions. Future research should include longitudinal studies of preceptorship and validation of the instrument with other professions, in other countries, and in other cultures.
期刊介绍:
Nursing Reports is an open access, peer-reviewed, online-only journal that aims to influence the art and science of nursing by making rigorously conducted research accessible and understood to the full spectrum of practicing nurses, academics, educators and interested members of the public. The journal represents an exhilarating opportunity to make a unique and significant contribution to nursing and the wider community by addressing topics, theories and issues that concern the whole field of Nursing Science, including research, practice, policy and education. The primary intent of the journal is to present scientifically sound and influential empirical and theoretical studies, critical reviews and open debates to the global community of nurses. Short reports, opinions and insight into the plight of nurses the world-over will provide a voice for those of all cultures, governments and perspectives. The emphasis of Nursing Reports will be on ensuring that the highest quality of evidence and contribution is made available to the greatest number of nurses. Nursing Reports aims to make original, evidence-based, peer-reviewed research available to the global community of nurses and to interested members of the public. In addition, reviews of the literature, open debates on professional issues and short reports from around the world are invited to contribute to our vibrant and dynamic journal. All published work will adhere to the most stringent ethical standards and journalistic principles of fairness, worth and credibility. Our journal publishes Editorials, Original Articles, Review articles, Critical Debates, Short Reports from Around the Globe and Letters to the Editor.