Towfik Sebai, Marwan Zein, Yara Ghandour, Baraa AlJardali, Hani Tamim, Albert El Hajj
{"title":"男性压力性尿失禁手术的并发症:来自大型国家数据库的尿道吊带与人工尿括约肌的比较分析。","authors":"Towfik Sebai, Marwan Zein, Yara Ghandour, Baraa AlJardali, Hani Tamim, Albert El Hajj","doi":"10.1177/17562872251375528","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in men, often due to radical prostatectomy or sphincter deficiency, impacts quality of life. Surgical options include artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) and male urethral slings, valued for lower risks and cost. Understanding their outcomes aids in patient care.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare 30-day postoperative outcomes in AUS versus sling implantation in males.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study using a multicenter database.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Male patients who underwent sling or AUS implantation between 2008 and 2022 were identified in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database using current procedural terminology (CPT) codes. Patient characteristics, intraoperative factors, and 30-day outcomes were extracted and compared. Multivariate logistic regression adjusted for age, body mass index (BMI), race, ASA classification, anesthesia technique, smoking status, history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), congestive heart failure (CHF), diabetes, hypertension requiring medication, bleeding disorders, and chronic steroid use. A 1:1 propensity score-matched analysis was also conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 4,498 patients, 39.6% received slings and 60.4% AUS. After adjustment, AUS was associated with higher odds of 30-day complications (OR 1.48 (1.09-2.02), <i>p</i> = 0.012), including surgical site infections (OR 2.19), overall infections (OR 1.84), implant complications (OR 4.08), genitourinary complications (OR 2.31), unplanned reoperation (OR 2.04), Clavien-Dindo Grade I-II (OR 1.58) and Grade III complications (OR 2.10), and prolonged hospital stay (OR 4.66-5.71; all <i>p</i> < 0.001). The 1:1 matched analysis largely supported these findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AUS implantation is associated with higher 30-day postoperative complication rates compared to male urethral sling placement. These results may guide surgeons in their perioperative counseling regarding the short-term complication rates of both procedures, but further studies are needed to assess the long-term outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":23010,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Urology","volume":"17 ","pages":"17562872251375528"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12457759/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Complications of stress urinary incontinence surgery in men: a comparative analysis of urethral sling versus artificial urinary sphincter from a large national database.\",\"authors\":\"Towfik Sebai, Marwan Zein, Yara Ghandour, Baraa AlJardali, Hani Tamim, Albert El Hajj\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17562872251375528\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in men, often due to radical prostatectomy or sphincter deficiency, impacts quality of life. Surgical options include artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) and male urethral slings, valued for lower risks and cost. Understanding their outcomes aids in patient care.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare 30-day postoperative outcomes in AUS versus sling implantation in males.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study using a multicenter database.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Male patients who underwent sling or AUS implantation between 2008 and 2022 were identified in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database using current procedural terminology (CPT) codes. Patient characteristics, intraoperative factors, and 30-day outcomes were extracted and compared. Multivariate logistic regression adjusted for age, body mass index (BMI), race, ASA classification, anesthesia technique, smoking status, history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), congestive heart failure (CHF), diabetes, hypertension requiring medication, bleeding disorders, and chronic steroid use. A 1:1 propensity score-matched analysis was also conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 4,498 patients, 39.6% received slings and 60.4% AUS. After adjustment, AUS was associated with higher odds of 30-day complications (OR 1.48 (1.09-2.02), <i>p</i> = 0.012), including surgical site infections (OR 2.19), overall infections (OR 1.84), implant complications (OR 4.08), genitourinary complications (OR 2.31), unplanned reoperation (OR 2.04), Clavien-Dindo Grade I-II (OR 1.58) and Grade III complications (OR 2.10), and prolonged hospital stay (OR 4.66-5.71; all <i>p</i> < 0.001). The 1:1 matched analysis largely supported these findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AUS implantation is associated with higher 30-day postoperative complication rates compared to male urethral sling placement. These results may guide surgeons in their perioperative counseling regarding the short-term complication rates of both procedures, but further studies are needed to assess the long-term outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23010,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Urology\",\"volume\":\"17 \",\"pages\":\"17562872251375528\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12457759/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17562872251375528\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17562872251375528","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Complications of stress urinary incontinence surgery in men: a comparative analysis of urethral sling versus artificial urinary sphincter from a large national database.
Background: Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in men, often due to radical prostatectomy or sphincter deficiency, impacts quality of life. Surgical options include artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) and male urethral slings, valued for lower risks and cost. Understanding their outcomes aids in patient care.
Objectives: To compare 30-day postoperative outcomes in AUS versus sling implantation in males.
Design: Retrospective cohort study using a multicenter database.
Methods: Male patients who underwent sling or AUS implantation between 2008 and 2022 were identified in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database using current procedural terminology (CPT) codes. Patient characteristics, intraoperative factors, and 30-day outcomes were extracted and compared. Multivariate logistic regression adjusted for age, body mass index (BMI), race, ASA classification, anesthesia technique, smoking status, history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), congestive heart failure (CHF), diabetes, hypertension requiring medication, bleeding disorders, and chronic steroid use. A 1:1 propensity score-matched analysis was also conducted.
Results: Among 4,498 patients, 39.6% received slings and 60.4% AUS. After adjustment, AUS was associated with higher odds of 30-day complications (OR 1.48 (1.09-2.02), p = 0.012), including surgical site infections (OR 2.19), overall infections (OR 1.84), implant complications (OR 4.08), genitourinary complications (OR 2.31), unplanned reoperation (OR 2.04), Clavien-Dindo Grade I-II (OR 1.58) and Grade III complications (OR 2.10), and prolonged hospital stay (OR 4.66-5.71; all p < 0.001). The 1:1 matched analysis largely supported these findings.
Conclusion: AUS implantation is associated with higher 30-day postoperative complication rates compared to male urethral sling placement. These results may guide surgeons in their perioperative counseling regarding the short-term complication rates of both procedures, but further studies are needed to assess the long-term outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Therapeutic Advances in Urology delivers the highest quality peer-reviewed articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies across all areas of urology.
The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at clinicians and researchers in urology, providing a forum in print and online for publishing the highest quality articles in this area. The editors welcome articles of current interest across all areas of urology, including treatment of urological disorders, with a focus on emerging pharmacological therapies.