男性压力性尿失禁手术的并发症:来自大型国家数据库的尿道吊带与人工尿括约肌的比较分析。

IF 3.5 4区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Therapeutic Advances in Urology Pub Date : 2025-09-23 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/17562872251375528
Towfik Sebai, Marwan Zein, Yara Ghandour, Baraa AlJardali, Hani Tamim, Albert El Hajj
{"title":"男性压力性尿失禁手术的并发症:来自大型国家数据库的尿道吊带与人工尿括约肌的比较分析。","authors":"Towfik Sebai, Marwan Zein, Yara Ghandour, Baraa AlJardali, Hani Tamim, Albert El Hajj","doi":"10.1177/17562872251375528","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in men, often due to radical prostatectomy or sphincter deficiency, impacts quality of life. Surgical options include artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) and male urethral slings, valued for lower risks and cost. Understanding their outcomes aids in patient care.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare 30-day postoperative outcomes in AUS versus sling implantation in males.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study using a multicenter database.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Male patients who underwent sling or AUS implantation between 2008 and 2022 were identified in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database using current procedural terminology (CPT) codes. Patient characteristics, intraoperative factors, and 30-day outcomes were extracted and compared. Multivariate logistic regression adjusted for age, body mass index (BMI), race, ASA classification, anesthesia technique, smoking status, history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), congestive heart failure (CHF), diabetes, hypertension requiring medication, bleeding disorders, and chronic steroid use. A 1:1 propensity score-matched analysis was also conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 4,498 patients, 39.6% received slings and 60.4% AUS. After adjustment, AUS was associated with higher odds of 30-day complications (OR 1.48 (1.09-2.02), <i>p</i> = 0.012), including surgical site infections (OR 2.19), overall infections (OR 1.84), implant complications (OR 4.08), genitourinary complications (OR 2.31), unplanned reoperation (OR 2.04), Clavien-Dindo Grade I-II (OR 1.58) and Grade III complications (OR 2.10), and prolonged hospital stay (OR 4.66-5.71; all <i>p</i> < 0.001). The 1:1 matched analysis largely supported these findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AUS implantation is associated with higher 30-day postoperative complication rates compared to male urethral sling placement. These results may guide surgeons in their perioperative counseling regarding the short-term complication rates of both procedures, but further studies are needed to assess the long-term outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":23010,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Urology","volume":"17 ","pages":"17562872251375528"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12457759/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Complications of stress urinary incontinence surgery in men: a comparative analysis of urethral sling versus artificial urinary sphincter from a large national database.\",\"authors\":\"Towfik Sebai, Marwan Zein, Yara Ghandour, Baraa AlJardali, Hani Tamim, Albert El Hajj\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17562872251375528\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in men, often due to radical prostatectomy or sphincter deficiency, impacts quality of life. Surgical options include artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) and male urethral slings, valued for lower risks and cost. Understanding their outcomes aids in patient care.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare 30-day postoperative outcomes in AUS versus sling implantation in males.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study using a multicenter database.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Male patients who underwent sling or AUS implantation between 2008 and 2022 were identified in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database using current procedural terminology (CPT) codes. Patient characteristics, intraoperative factors, and 30-day outcomes were extracted and compared. Multivariate logistic regression adjusted for age, body mass index (BMI), race, ASA classification, anesthesia technique, smoking status, history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), congestive heart failure (CHF), diabetes, hypertension requiring medication, bleeding disorders, and chronic steroid use. A 1:1 propensity score-matched analysis was also conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 4,498 patients, 39.6% received slings and 60.4% AUS. After adjustment, AUS was associated with higher odds of 30-day complications (OR 1.48 (1.09-2.02), <i>p</i> = 0.012), including surgical site infections (OR 2.19), overall infections (OR 1.84), implant complications (OR 4.08), genitourinary complications (OR 2.31), unplanned reoperation (OR 2.04), Clavien-Dindo Grade I-II (OR 1.58) and Grade III complications (OR 2.10), and prolonged hospital stay (OR 4.66-5.71; all <i>p</i> < 0.001). The 1:1 matched analysis largely supported these findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AUS implantation is associated with higher 30-day postoperative complication rates compared to male urethral sling placement. These results may guide surgeons in their perioperative counseling regarding the short-term complication rates of both procedures, but further studies are needed to assess the long-term outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23010,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Urology\",\"volume\":\"17 \",\"pages\":\"17562872251375528\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12457759/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17562872251375528\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17562872251375528","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:男性压力性尿失禁(SUI)通常是由根治性前列腺切除术或括约肌功能障碍引起的,影响生活质量。手术选择包括人工尿道括约肌(AUS)和男性尿道吊带,其风险和成本较低。了解他们的结果有助于病人护理。目的:比较男性AUS与吊带植入术术后30天的预后。设计:采用多中心数据库的回顾性队列研究。方法:使用现行程序术语(CPT)代码在国家外科质量改进计划(NSQIP)数据库中识别2008年至2022年间接受吊带或AUS植入的男性患者。提取并比较患者特征、术中因素和30天预后。多因素logistic回归校正了年龄、体重指数(BMI)、种族、ASA分类、麻醉技术、吸烟状况、慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)、充血性心力衰竭(CHF)、糖尿病、高血压用药史、出血性疾病和慢性类固醇使用。还进行了1:1倾向评分匹配分析。结果:4498例患者中39.6%接受吊带治疗,60.4%接受AUS治疗。调整后,AUS与30天并发症的高发生率相关(OR 1.48 (1.09-2.02), p = 0.012),包括手术部位感染(OR 2.19)、总体感染(OR 1.84)、种植体并发症(OR 4.08)、泌尿生殖系统并发症(OR 2.31)、意外再手术(OR 2.04)、Clavien-Dindo I-II级(OR 1.58)和III级并发症(OR 2.10)、住院时间延长(OR 4.66-5.71;结论:与男性尿道吊带置入相比,AUS植入术术后30天并发症发生率较高。这些结果可以指导外科医生对两种手术的短期并发症率进行围手术期咨询,但需要进一步的研究来评估长期结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Complications of stress urinary incontinence surgery in men: a comparative analysis of urethral sling versus artificial urinary sphincter from a large national database.

Complications of stress urinary incontinence surgery in men: a comparative analysis of urethral sling versus artificial urinary sphincter from a large national database.

Complications of stress urinary incontinence surgery in men: a comparative analysis of urethral sling versus artificial urinary sphincter from a large national database.

Complications of stress urinary incontinence surgery in men: a comparative analysis of urethral sling versus artificial urinary sphincter from a large national database.

Background: Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in men, often due to radical prostatectomy or sphincter deficiency, impacts quality of life. Surgical options include artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) and male urethral slings, valued for lower risks and cost. Understanding their outcomes aids in patient care.

Objectives: To compare 30-day postoperative outcomes in AUS versus sling implantation in males.

Design: Retrospective cohort study using a multicenter database.

Methods: Male patients who underwent sling or AUS implantation between 2008 and 2022 were identified in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database using current procedural terminology (CPT) codes. Patient characteristics, intraoperative factors, and 30-day outcomes were extracted and compared. Multivariate logistic regression adjusted for age, body mass index (BMI), race, ASA classification, anesthesia technique, smoking status, history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), congestive heart failure (CHF), diabetes, hypertension requiring medication, bleeding disorders, and chronic steroid use. A 1:1 propensity score-matched analysis was also conducted.

Results: Among 4,498 patients, 39.6% received slings and 60.4% AUS. After adjustment, AUS was associated with higher odds of 30-day complications (OR 1.48 (1.09-2.02), p = 0.012), including surgical site infections (OR 2.19), overall infections (OR 1.84), implant complications (OR 4.08), genitourinary complications (OR 2.31), unplanned reoperation (OR 2.04), Clavien-Dindo Grade I-II (OR 1.58) and Grade III complications (OR 2.10), and prolonged hospital stay (OR 4.66-5.71; all p < 0.001). The 1:1 matched analysis largely supported these findings.

Conclusion: AUS implantation is associated with higher 30-day postoperative complication rates compared to male urethral sling placement. These results may guide surgeons in their perioperative counseling regarding the short-term complication rates of both procedures, but further studies are needed to assess the long-term outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Urology delivers the highest quality peer-reviewed articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies across all areas of urology. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at clinicians and researchers in urology, providing a forum in print and online for publishing the highest quality articles in this area. The editors welcome articles of current interest across all areas of urology, including treatment of urological disorders, with a focus on emerging pharmacological therapies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信