探索COVID-19期间土著健康决定因素在土著民族复原力中的作用。

IF 1.2 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Amanda M Hunter, Melinda Smith, Andria B Begay, Nicolette Teufel-Shone, Karen Jarratt-Snider, Carol Goldtooth, Manley Begay, Darold H Joseph, Angelina Castagno, Juliette Roddy, Chesleigh Keene, Alisse Ali-Joseph, Julie A Baldwin
{"title":"探索COVID-19期间土著健康决定因素在土著民族复原力中的作用。","authors":"Amanda M Hunter, Melinda Smith, Andria B Begay, Nicolette Teufel-Shone, Karen Jarratt-Snider, Carol Goldtooth, Manley Begay, Darold H Joseph, Angelina Castagno, Juliette Roddy, Chesleigh Keene, Alisse Ali-Joseph, Julie A Baldwin","doi":"10.5820/aian.3203.2025.42","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>American Indians and Alaska Natives (AI/ANs) were disproportionately affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, experiencing excess hospitalization, mortality, and economic losses compared to the non- Hispanic Whites. This study sought to document the Indigenous determinants of health (IDOH) in AI/AN communities that shaped mental wellbeing for four groups: educators, traditional knowledge holders/practitioners, first responders, and substance abuse recovery community, during the pandemic. This work was a collaboration with and had research approval from three Native nations in Arizona. In-depth interviews were conducted from May to November 2021; 92 participants were interviewed. The most prevalent IDOH and associated themes included strategies to cope with emotional and social stressors and the impact on physical and mental health, relationships, kinship, cultural continuity, and self-determination. The groups experienced differences in mental wellbeing aligned with their occupation. For example, first responders experienced disruption and social dissonance in the workplace due to varying political views, and traditional knowledge holders/ practitioners experienced a revitalization of cultural strategies to maintain health. Although the differences between occupational groups are striking, the similarities that did exist were grounded in Indigenous identity and worldview that emphasize relationships and connection to the natural environment.</p>","PeriodicalId":46147,"journal":{"name":"American Indian and Alaska Native Mental Health Research","volume":"32 3","pages":"42-69"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the Role of Indigenous Determinants of Health in the Resilience of Native Nations during COVID-19.\",\"authors\":\"Amanda M Hunter, Melinda Smith, Andria B Begay, Nicolette Teufel-Shone, Karen Jarratt-Snider, Carol Goldtooth, Manley Begay, Darold H Joseph, Angelina Castagno, Juliette Roddy, Chesleigh Keene, Alisse Ali-Joseph, Julie A Baldwin\",\"doi\":\"10.5820/aian.3203.2025.42\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>American Indians and Alaska Natives (AI/ANs) were disproportionately affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, experiencing excess hospitalization, mortality, and economic losses compared to the non- Hispanic Whites. This study sought to document the Indigenous determinants of health (IDOH) in AI/AN communities that shaped mental wellbeing for four groups: educators, traditional knowledge holders/practitioners, first responders, and substance abuse recovery community, during the pandemic. This work was a collaboration with and had research approval from three Native nations in Arizona. In-depth interviews were conducted from May to November 2021; 92 participants were interviewed. The most prevalent IDOH and associated themes included strategies to cope with emotional and social stressors and the impact on physical and mental health, relationships, kinship, cultural continuity, and self-determination. The groups experienced differences in mental wellbeing aligned with their occupation. For example, first responders experienced disruption and social dissonance in the workplace due to varying political views, and traditional knowledge holders/ practitioners experienced a revitalization of cultural strategies to maintain health. Although the differences between occupational groups are striking, the similarities that did exist were grounded in Indigenous identity and worldview that emphasize relationships and connection to the natural environment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46147,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Indian and Alaska Native Mental Health Research\",\"volume\":\"32 3\",\"pages\":\"42-69\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Indian and Alaska Native Mental Health Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5820/aian.3203.2025.42\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Indian and Alaska Native Mental Health Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5820/aian.3203.2025.42","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

与非西班牙裔白人相比,美洲印第安人和阿拉斯加原住民(AI/ANs)受到COVID-19大流行的影响尤为严重,他们的住院率、死亡率和经济损失都高于其他人群。本研究试图记录AI/AN社区的土著健康决定因素(IDOH),这些因素在大流行期间影响了四个群体的心理健康:教育者、传统知识持有者/从业者、第一响应者和药物滥用康复社区。这项工作是与亚利桑那州的三个土著民族合作并获得了研究批准。2021年5月至11月进行深度访谈;92名参与者接受了采访。最普遍的IDOH和相关主题包括应对情绪和社会压力源以及对身心健康、关系、亲属关系、文化连续性和自决的影响的战略。这两组人的心理健康状况与他们的职业有关。例如,由于不同的政治观点,第一反应者在工作场所经历了干扰和社会失调,传统知识持有者/从业者经历了保持健康的文化战略的复兴。虽然职业群体之间的差异是惊人的,但确实存在的相似之处是基于土著身份和强调与自然环境的关系和联系的世界观。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring the Role of Indigenous Determinants of Health in the Resilience of Native Nations during COVID-19.

American Indians and Alaska Natives (AI/ANs) were disproportionately affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, experiencing excess hospitalization, mortality, and economic losses compared to the non- Hispanic Whites. This study sought to document the Indigenous determinants of health (IDOH) in AI/AN communities that shaped mental wellbeing for four groups: educators, traditional knowledge holders/practitioners, first responders, and substance abuse recovery community, during the pandemic. This work was a collaboration with and had research approval from three Native nations in Arizona. In-depth interviews were conducted from May to November 2021; 92 participants were interviewed. The most prevalent IDOH and associated themes included strategies to cope with emotional and social stressors and the impact on physical and mental health, relationships, kinship, cultural continuity, and self-determination. The groups experienced differences in mental wellbeing aligned with their occupation. For example, first responders experienced disruption and social dissonance in the workplace due to varying political views, and traditional knowledge holders/ practitioners experienced a revitalization of cultural strategies to maintain health. Although the differences between occupational groups are striking, the similarities that did exist were grounded in Indigenous identity and worldview that emphasize relationships and connection to the natural environment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
30.80%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: American Indian and Alaska Native Mental Health Research: The Journal of the National Center is a professionally refereed scientific journal. It contains empirical research, program evaluations, case studies, unpublished dissertations, and other articles in the behavioral, social, and health sciences which clearly relate to the mental health status of American Indians and Alaska Natives. All topical areas relating to this field are addressed, such as psychology, psychiatry, nursing, sociology, anthropology, social work, and specific areas of education, medicine, history, and law. Through a standardized format (American Psychological Association guidelines) new data regarding this special population is easier to retrieve, compare, and evaluate.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信