急性缺血性卒中远程缺血调节的多中心转化试验(TRICS BASIC)。

IF 8.9 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Simone Beretta, Mauro Tettamanti, Jacopo Mariani, Susanna Diamanti, Alessia Valente, Ornella Cuomo, Chiara Di Santo, Ilaria Dettori, Martina Venturini, Irene Bulli, Elisabetta Coppi, Manuel Alejandro Montano Castillo, Erica Butti, Giorgia Serena Gullotta, Martina Viganò, Francesco Santangelo, Francesco Andrea Pedrazzini, Carlo Perego, Serena Seminara, Serenella Anzilotti, Joanna Rzemieniec, Laura Castiglioni, Benedetta Mercuriali, Majeda Muluhie, Chiara Paola Zoia, Gessica Sala, Luigi Sironi, Marco Bacigaluppi, Gianvito Martino, Felicita Pedata, Anna Maria Pugliese, Diana Amantea, Giacinto Bagetta, Antonio Vinciguerra, Giuseppe Pignataro, Stefano Fumagalli, Maria-Grazia De Simoni, Carlo Ferrarese
{"title":"急性缺血性卒中远程缺血调节的多中心转化试验(TRICS BASIC)。","authors":"Simone Beretta, Mauro Tettamanti, Jacopo Mariani, Susanna Diamanti, Alessia Valente, Ornella Cuomo, Chiara Di Santo, Ilaria Dettori, Martina Venturini, Irene Bulli, Elisabetta Coppi, Manuel Alejandro Montano Castillo, Erica Butti, Giorgia Serena Gullotta, Martina Viganò, Francesco Santangelo, Francesco Andrea Pedrazzini, Carlo Perego, Serena Seminara, Serenella Anzilotti, Joanna Rzemieniec, Laura Castiglioni, Benedetta Mercuriali, Majeda Muluhie, Chiara Paola Zoia, Gessica Sala, Luigi Sironi, Marco Bacigaluppi, Gianvito Martino, Felicita Pedata, Anna Maria Pugliese, Diana Amantea, Giacinto Bagetta, Antonio Vinciguerra, Giuseppe Pignataro, Stefano Fumagalli, Maria-Grazia De Simoni, Carlo Ferrarese","doi":"10.1161/STROKEAHA.125.051532","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Basic science studies have reported remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) as neuroprotective in acute ischemic stroke, although clinical evidence remains conflicting. The TRICS BASIC study (Multicenter Translational Trial of Remote Ischemic Conditioning in Acute Ischemic Stroke) investigated the efficacy and safety of RIC in experimental ischemic stroke using a rigorous clinical trial methodology.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Multicenter, multispecies, parallel group, randomized, controlled, preclinical trial of transient femoral artery clipping to induce RIC in female and male rats and mice subjected to transient endovascular occlusion of the middle cerebral artery. Animals were randomized to receive RIC, or sham surgery, after reperfusion. The primary end point was a good functional outcome at 48 hours, assessed using a composite functional neuroscore. Secondary end points were infarct volume at 48 hours and safety, assessed using a standardized health report at 24 and 48 hours. Preenrollment harmonization, centralized monitoring, allocation concealment, blinded outcome assessment, and intention-to-treat analysis were applied.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The trial enrolled 164 rodents (82 mice and 82 rats) of both sexes (53% females), across 7 laboratories. A greater proportion of RIC-treated rodents achieved a favorable functional outcome compared with controls, at 48 hours postischemia (55% versus 36%; odds ratio, 2.2 [95% CI, 1.23-4.4]; <i>P</i>=0.009). RIC was associated with a small reduction in infarct volume (standardized mean difference, -0.38 [95% CI, -0.70 to -0.05]; <i>P</i>=0.024). Health monitoring indicated no major safety concerns, and postoperative analgesia requirements were lower in RIC-treated mice.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Surgically induced RIC provided a modest but evident neuroprotective effect in experimental ischemic stroke, underscoring the potential of this strategy as an adjunctive treatment in stroke care. The findings of the TRICS BASIC study highlighted the importance of multicenter preclinical trials in addressing variability and enhancing translational validity.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>URL: https://www.preclinicaltrials.eu; Unique identifier: PCTE0000177.</p>","PeriodicalId":21989,"journal":{"name":"Stroke","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multicenter Translational Trial of Remote Ischemic Conditioning in Acute Ischemic Stroke (TRICS BASIC).\",\"authors\":\"Simone Beretta, Mauro Tettamanti, Jacopo Mariani, Susanna Diamanti, Alessia Valente, Ornella Cuomo, Chiara Di Santo, Ilaria Dettori, Martina Venturini, Irene Bulli, Elisabetta Coppi, Manuel Alejandro Montano Castillo, Erica Butti, Giorgia Serena Gullotta, Martina Viganò, Francesco Santangelo, Francesco Andrea Pedrazzini, Carlo Perego, Serena Seminara, Serenella Anzilotti, Joanna Rzemieniec, Laura Castiglioni, Benedetta Mercuriali, Majeda Muluhie, Chiara Paola Zoia, Gessica Sala, Luigi Sironi, Marco Bacigaluppi, Gianvito Martino, Felicita Pedata, Anna Maria Pugliese, Diana Amantea, Giacinto Bagetta, Antonio Vinciguerra, Giuseppe Pignataro, Stefano Fumagalli, Maria-Grazia De Simoni, Carlo Ferrarese\",\"doi\":\"10.1161/STROKEAHA.125.051532\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Basic science studies have reported remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) as neuroprotective in acute ischemic stroke, although clinical evidence remains conflicting. The TRICS BASIC study (Multicenter Translational Trial of Remote Ischemic Conditioning in Acute Ischemic Stroke) investigated the efficacy and safety of RIC in experimental ischemic stroke using a rigorous clinical trial methodology.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Multicenter, multispecies, parallel group, randomized, controlled, preclinical trial of transient femoral artery clipping to induce RIC in female and male rats and mice subjected to transient endovascular occlusion of the middle cerebral artery. Animals were randomized to receive RIC, or sham surgery, after reperfusion. The primary end point was a good functional outcome at 48 hours, assessed using a composite functional neuroscore. Secondary end points were infarct volume at 48 hours and safety, assessed using a standardized health report at 24 and 48 hours. Preenrollment harmonization, centralized monitoring, allocation concealment, blinded outcome assessment, and intention-to-treat analysis were applied.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The trial enrolled 164 rodents (82 mice and 82 rats) of both sexes (53% females), across 7 laboratories. A greater proportion of RIC-treated rodents achieved a favorable functional outcome compared with controls, at 48 hours postischemia (55% versus 36%; odds ratio, 2.2 [95% CI, 1.23-4.4]; <i>P</i>=0.009). RIC was associated with a small reduction in infarct volume (standardized mean difference, -0.38 [95% CI, -0.70 to -0.05]; <i>P</i>=0.024). Health monitoring indicated no major safety concerns, and postoperative analgesia requirements were lower in RIC-treated mice.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Surgically induced RIC provided a modest but evident neuroprotective effect in experimental ischemic stroke, underscoring the potential of this strategy as an adjunctive treatment in stroke care. The findings of the TRICS BASIC study highlighted the importance of multicenter preclinical trials in addressing variability and enhancing translational validity.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>URL: https://www.preclinicaltrials.eu; Unique identifier: PCTE0000177.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Stroke\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Stroke\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.125.051532\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stroke","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.125.051532","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:基础科学研究已经报道了远端缺血调节(RIC)在急性缺血性脑卒中中具有神经保护作用,尽管临床证据仍然相互矛盾。TRICS BASIC研究(急性缺血性卒中远程缺血调节的多中心转化试验)采用严格的临床试验方法研究了RIC在实验性缺血性卒中中的疗效和安全性。方法:多中心、多物种、平行组、随机、对照、临床前试验,对大脑中动脉短暂性血管内闭塞的雌雄大鼠和小鼠进行短暂性股动脉夹闭诱导RIC。动物在再灌注后随机接受RIC或假手术。主要终点是48小时的良好功能结果,使用复合功能神经评分进行评估。次要终点是48小时的梗死体积和安全性,使用24小时和48小时的标准化健康报告进行评估。采用入组前协调、集中监测、分配隐瞒、盲法结局评估和意向治疗分析。结果:该试验在7个实验室中招募了164只雌雄啮齿动物(82只小鼠和82只大鼠)(53%为雌性)。在缺血后48小时,与对照组相比,接受过ric治疗的啮齿动物获得良好功能结果的比例更高(55%对36%;优势比为2.2 [95% CI, 1.23-4.4]; P=0.009)。RIC与梗死面积的小幅减少相关(标准化平均差为-0.38 [95% CI, -0.70至-0.05];P=0.024)。健康监测显示没有重大的安全问题,并且在ric治疗的小鼠中,术后镇痛需求较低。结论:手术诱导的RIC在实验性缺血性卒中中提供了适度但明显的神经保护作用,强调了该策略作为卒中护理辅助治疗的潜力。TRICS BASIC研究的结果强调了多中心临床前试验在解决变异性和提高转化有效性方面的重要性。注册:网址:https://www.preclinicaltrials.eu;唯一标识符:PCTE0000177。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Multicenter Translational Trial of Remote Ischemic Conditioning in Acute Ischemic Stroke (TRICS BASIC).

Background: Basic science studies have reported remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) as neuroprotective in acute ischemic stroke, although clinical evidence remains conflicting. The TRICS BASIC study (Multicenter Translational Trial of Remote Ischemic Conditioning in Acute Ischemic Stroke) investigated the efficacy and safety of RIC in experimental ischemic stroke using a rigorous clinical trial methodology.

Methods: Multicenter, multispecies, parallel group, randomized, controlled, preclinical trial of transient femoral artery clipping to induce RIC in female and male rats and mice subjected to transient endovascular occlusion of the middle cerebral artery. Animals were randomized to receive RIC, or sham surgery, after reperfusion. The primary end point was a good functional outcome at 48 hours, assessed using a composite functional neuroscore. Secondary end points were infarct volume at 48 hours and safety, assessed using a standardized health report at 24 and 48 hours. Preenrollment harmonization, centralized monitoring, allocation concealment, blinded outcome assessment, and intention-to-treat analysis were applied.

Results: The trial enrolled 164 rodents (82 mice and 82 rats) of both sexes (53% females), across 7 laboratories. A greater proportion of RIC-treated rodents achieved a favorable functional outcome compared with controls, at 48 hours postischemia (55% versus 36%; odds ratio, 2.2 [95% CI, 1.23-4.4]; P=0.009). RIC was associated with a small reduction in infarct volume (standardized mean difference, -0.38 [95% CI, -0.70 to -0.05]; P=0.024). Health monitoring indicated no major safety concerns, and postoperative analgesia requirements were lower in RIC-treated mice.

Conclusions: Surgically induced RIC provided a modest but evident neuroprotective effect in experimental ischemic stroke, underscoring the potential of this strategy as an adjunctive treatment in stroke care. The findings of the TRICS BASIC study highlighted the importance of multicenter preclinical trials in addressing variability and enhancing translational validity.

Registration: URL: https://www.preclinicaltrials.eu; Unique identifier: PCTE0000177.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Stroke
Stroke 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
13.40
自引率
6.00%
发文量
2021
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Stroke is a monthly publication that collates reports of clinical and basic investigation of any aspect of the cerebral circulation and its diseases. The publication covers a wide range of disciplines including anesthesiology, critical care medicine, epidemiology, internal medicine, neurology, neuro-ophthalmology, neuropathology, neuropsychology, neurosurgery, nuclear medicine, nursing, radiology, rehabilitation, speech pathology, vascular physiology, and vascular surgery. The audience of Stroke includes neurologists, basic scientists, cardiologists, vascular surgeons, internists, interventionalists, neurosurgeons, nurses, and physiatrists. Stroke is indexed in Biological Abstracts, BIOSIS, CAB Abstracts, Chemical Abstracts, CINAHL, Current Contents, Embase, MEDLINE, and Science Citation Index Expanded.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信