性健康和生殖健康服务的远程咨询:对有效性、成本效益、经验、获取和公平的证据进行系统审查。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Charlotte Spurway, Iestyn Williams, Oluseyi Cyril Ayinde, Christian Bohm, Fiona Burns, Jo Gibbs, Jo Josh, Helen Munro, Melvina Woode Owusu, Danielle Solomon, Jonathan Dc Ross, Louise J Jackson
{"title":"性健康和生殖健康服务的远程咨询:对有效性、成本效益、经验、获取和公平的证据进行系统审查。","authors":"Charlotte Spurway, Iestyn Williams, Oluseyi Cyril Ayinde, Christian Bohm, Fiona Burns, Jo Gibbs, Jo Josh, Helen Munro, Melvina Woode Owusu, Danielle Solomon, Jonathan Dc Ross, Louise J Jackson","doi":"10.1136/sextrans-2024-056458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Timely access to sexual health screening and contraception is an important public health issue. Substantial funding reductions for sexual and reproductive health services (SRHS) and COVID-19 have led to significant changes in service delivery, including the rapid introduction of remote consultations, as a substitute for in-person contact. There is limited evidence relating to the barriers to remote consultations and how these may impact sexual health outcomes and wider health inequalities. This study synthesises existing evidence on remote consultations to examine effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, experiences, access and equity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eighteen electronic databases were systematically searched to locate relevant studies published from OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) countries after 2010. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool was used to evaluate the quality of the studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 8690 studies identified, 48 met the inclusion criteria. The included studies were heterogeneous and covered a range of topics; however, few focused on health inequalities and remote consultations, with satisfaction and quality of care being the most common outcome measures. Many of the studies were completed post-2020 in response to COVID-19 and were of medium to low quality. Access to technology and communication challenges were found to impact inequality when accessing SRHS via remote consultations, although they enhance convenience for service users and service providers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, the review shows that a range of studies have investigated remote consultations in SRHS, but there remains limited evidence on the impact on health inequalities and sexual health outcomes. The surge in post-2020 research, spurred by COVID-19, indicates the necessity for further high-quality research into equitable SRHS delivery in the post-COVID era, particularly in addressing technological and communication barriers. There is a need to further optimise access and the delivery of remote consultations in SRHS, considering the needs of service users, and minimising inequality (observed differences) and inequity (unfair differences).CRD42023397288.</p>","PeriodicalId":21624,"journal":{"name":"Sexually Transmitted Infections","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Remote consultations in sexual and reproductive health services: a systematic review of evidence on effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, experiences, access and equity.\",\"authors\":\"Charlotte Spurway, Iestyn Williams, Oluseyi Cyril Ayinde, Christian Bohm, Fiona Burns, Jo Gibbs, Jo Josh, Helen Munro, Melvina Woode Owusu, Danielle Solomon, Jonathan Dc Ross, Louise J Jackson\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/sextrans-2024-056458\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Timely access to sexual health screening and contraception is an important public health issue. Substantial funding reductions for sexual and reproductive health services (SRHS) and COVID-19 have led to significant changes in service delivery, including the rapid introduction of remote consultations, as a substitute for in-person contact. There is limited evidence relating to the barriers to remote consultations and how these may impact sexual health outcomes and wider health inequalities. This study synthesises existing evidence on remote consultations to examine effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, experiences, access and equity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eighteen electronic databases were systematically searched to locate relevant studies published from OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) countries after 2010. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool was used to evaluate the quality of the studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 8690 studies identified, 48 met the inclusion criteria. The included studies were heterogeneous and covered a range of topics; however, few focused on health inequalities and remote consultations, with satisfaction and quality of care being the most common outcome measures. Many of the studies were completed post-2020 in response to COVID-19 and were of medium to low quality. Access to technology and communication challenges were found to impact inequality when accessing SRHS via remote consultations, although they enhance convenience for service users and service providers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, the review shows that a range of studies have investigated remote consultations in SRHS, but there remains limited evidence on the impact on health inequalities and sexual health outcomes. The surge in post-2020 research, spurred by COVID-19, indicates the necessity for further high-quality research into equitable SRHS delivery in the post-COVID era, particularly in addressing technological and communication barriers. There is a need to further optimise access and the delivery of remote consultations in SRHS, considering the needs of service users, and minimising inequality (observed differences) and inequity (unfair differences).CRD42023397288.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21624,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sexually Transmitted Infections\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sexually Transmitted Infections\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2024-056458\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sexually Transmitted Infections","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2024-056458","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:及时获得性健康检查和避孕是一个重要的公共卫生问题。性健康和生殖健康服务(性健康和生殖健康服务)的资金大幅减少以及COVID-19导致服务提供发生重大变化,包括迅速引入远程咨询,以取代面对面接触。关于远程咨询的障碍以及这些障碍如何影响性健康结果和更广泛的健康不平等的证据有限。这项研究综合了关于远程咨询的现有证据,以审查有效性、成本效益、经验、获取机会和公平性。方法:系统检索18个电子数据库,查找2010年以后OECD(经济合作与发展组织)国家发表的相关研究。采用混合方法评价工具评价研究的质量。结果:在8690项研究中,48项符合纳入标准。纳入的研究是异质的,涵盖了一系列的主题;然而,很少有人关注保健不平等和远程咨询,满意度和护理质量是最常见的结果衡量标准。许多研究是在2020年后为应对COVID-19而完成的,质量中低。研究发现,在通过远程咨询获取性健康和生殖健康服务时,获取技术和通信方面的挑战影响了不平等,尽管它们为服务用户和服务提供者提供了便利。结论:总体而言,审查表明,一系列研究调查了性健康和生殖健康服务中的远程咨询,但关于健康不平等和性健康结果的影响的证据仍然有限。2019冠状病毒病引发的2020年后研究激增表明,有必要进一步开展高质量研究,以实现后冠状病毒病时代性健康和生殖健康服务的公平交付,特别是在解决技术和沟通障碍方面。考虑到服务用户的需求,并最大限度地减少不平等(观察到的差异)和不公平(不公平的差异),有必要进一步优化SRHS的远程咨询的获取和提供。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Remote consultations in sexual and reproductive health services: a systematic review of evidence on effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, experiences, access and equity.

Objectives: Timely access to sexual health screening and contraception is an important public health issue. Substantial funding reductions for sexual and reproductive health services (SRHS) and COVID-19 have led to significant changes in service delivery, including the rapid introduction of remote consultations, as a substitute for in-person contact. There is limited evidence relating to the barriers to remote consultations and how these may impact sexual health outcomes and wider health inequalities. This study synthesises existing evidence on remote consultations to examine effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, experiences, access and equity.

Methods: Eighteen electronic databases were systematically searched to locate relevant studies published from OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) countries after 2010. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool was used to evaluate the quality of the studies.

Results: Out of 8690 studies identified, 48 met the inclusion criteria. The included studies were heterogeneous and covered a range of topics; however, few focused on health inequalities and remote consultations, with satisfaction and quality of care being the most common outcome measures. Many of the studies were completed post-2020 in response to COVID-19 and were of medium to low quality. Access to technology and communication challenges were found to impact inequality when accessing SRHS via remote consultations, although they enhance convenience for service users and service providers.

Conclusions: Overall, the review shows that a range of studies have investigated remote consultations in SRHS, but there remains limited evidence on the impact on health inequalities and sexual health outcomes. The surge in post-2020 research, spurred by COVID-19, indicates the necessity for further high-quality research into equitable SRHS delivery in the post-COVID era, particularly in addressing technological and communication barriers. There is a need to further optimise access and the delivery of remote consultations in SRHS, considering the needs of service users, and minimising inequality (observed differences) and inequity (unfair differences).CRD42023397288.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sexually Transmitted Infections
Sexually Transmitted Infections 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
96
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Sexually Transmitted Infections is the world’s longest running international journal on sexual health. It aims to keep practitioners, trainees and researchers up to date in the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of all STIs and HIV. The journal publishes original research, descriptive epidemiology, evidence-based reviews and comment on the clinical, public health, sociological and laboratory aspects of sexual health from around the world. We also publish educational articles, letters and other material of interest to readers, along with podcasts and other online material. STI provides a high quality editorial service from submission to publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信