Anders Wieghorst, Britt Borregaard, Ann-Dorthe Zwisler, Tonny Elmose Andersen, Mette Kirstine Wagner, Camilla Bring, Lars Evald
{"title":"丹麦心脏骤停幸存者认知筛查(DANcSCA)的预测价值——一种数字认知筛查。","authors":"Anders Wieghorst, Britt Borregaard, Ann-Dorthe Zwisler, Tonny Elmose Andersen, Mette Kirstine Wagner, Camilla Bring, Lars Evald","doi":"10.1016/j.resuscitation.2025.110842","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Persistent cognitive deficits affect up to 50% of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) survivors. Despite this prevalence, no consensus exists on the optimal tool for identifying deficits. This study assessed the predictive validity of the digital DANcSCA by comparing its classification of OHCA survivors into risk classes-green (low), yellow (moderate), and red (high)-against a neuropsychological test battery as the reference standard.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The prospective, multicentre DANcSCA validation study was conducted at Danish hospitals and the Knowledge Centre for Rehabilitation and Palliative Care. Adult OHCA survivors were included. The reference standard comprised four neuropsychological tests: Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test, Symbol Digit Modalities Test, Trail Making Test, and Verbal Fluency. The DANcSCA index test used subtests from the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery. Cognitive assessments occurred six to eight weeks post-arrest or during rehabilitation three months to three years post-arrest. ROC curves were constructed for binary classifications of green versus non-green and red versus non-red. Thresholds were set by fixing sensitivity at 0.90 for the green/non-green ROC and specificity at 0.90 for the red/non-red ROC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 175 participants, the DANcSCA classified 23% as green, 59% as yellow, and 18% as red, with 9% false positives and 5% false negatives. The ROC curve for distinguishing green from non-green had an AUC of 0.77, and for distinguishing red from non-red an AUC of 0.89.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The digital DANcSCA appears suitable for cognitive screening following OHCA, although the modest AUC for green/non-green and potential overfitting warrant validation in new samples.</p>","PeriodicalId":21052,"journal":{"name":"Resuscitation","volume":" ","pages":"110842"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictive values of the DANish Cognitive Screen for Cardiac Arrest Survivors (DANcSCA) - a digital cognitive screening.\",\"authors\":\"Anders Wieghorst, Britt Borregaard, Ann-Dorthe Zwisler, Tonny Elmose Andersen, Mette Kirstine Wagner, Camilla Bring, Lars Evald\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.resuscitation.2025.110842\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Persistent cognitive deficits affect up to 50% of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) survivors. Despite this prevalence, no consensus exists on the optimal tool for identifying deficits. This study assessed the predictive validity of the digital DANcSCA by comparing its classification of OHCA survivors into risk classes-green (low), yellow (moderate), and red (high)-against a neuropsychological test battery as the reference standard.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The prospective, multicentre DANcSCA validation study was conducted at Danish hospitals and the Knowledge Centre for Rehabilitation and Palliative Care. Adult OHCA survivors were included. The reference standard comprised four neuropsychological tests: Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test, Symbol Digit Modalities Test, Trail Making Test, and Verbal Fluency. The DANcSCA index test used subtests from the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery. Cognitive assessments occurred six to eight weeks post-arrest or during rehabilitation three months to three years post-arrest. ROC curves were constructed for binary classifications of green versus non-green and red versus non-red. Thresholds were set by fixing sensitivity at 0.90 for the green/non-green ROC and specificity at 0.90 for the red/non-red ROC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 175 participants, the DANcSCA classified 23% as green, 59% as yellow, and 18% as red, with 9% false positives and 5% false negatives. The ROC curve for distinguishing green from non-green had an AUC of 0.77, and for distinguishing red from non-red an AUC of 0.89.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The digital DANcSCA appears suitable for cognitive screening following OHCA, although the modest AUC for green/non-green and potential overfitting warrant validation in new samples.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21052,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Resuscitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"110842\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Resuscitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2025.110842\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resuscitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2025.110842","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Predictive values of the DANish Cognitive Screen for Cardiac Arrest Survivors (DANcSCA) - a digital cognitive screening.
Background: Persistent cognitive deficits affect up to 50% of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) survivors. Despite this prevalence, no consensus exists on the optimal tool for identifying deficits. This study assessed the predictive validity of the digital DANcSCA by comparing its classification of OHCA survivors into risk classes-green (low), yellow (moderate), and red (high)-against a neuropsychological test battery as the reference standard.
Methods: The prospective, multicentre DANcSCA validation study was conducted at Danish hospitals and the Knowledge Centre for Rehabilitation and Palliative Care. Adult OHCA survivors were included. The reference standard comprised four neuropsychological tests: Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test, Symbol Digit Modalities Test, Trail Making Test, and Verbal Fluency. The DANcSCA index test used subtests from the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery. Cognitive assessments occurred six to eight weeks post-arrest or during rehabilitation three months to three years post-arrest. ROC curves were constructed for binary classifications of green versus non-green and red versus non-red. Thresholds were set by fixing sensitivity at 0.90 for the green/non-green ROC and specificity at 0.90 for the red/non-red ROC.
Results: Among 175 participants, the DANcSCA classified 23% as green, 59% as yellow, and 18% as red, with 9% false positives and 5% false negatives. The ROC curve for distinguishing green from non-green had an AUC of 0.77, and for distinguishing red from non-red an AUC of 0.89.
Conclusion: The digital DANcSCA appears suitable for cognitive screening following OHCA, although the modest AUC for green/non-green and potential overfitting warrant validation in new samples.
期刊介绍:
Resuscitation is a monthly international and interdisciplinary medical journal. The papers published deal with the aetiology, pathophysiology and prevention of cardiac arrest, resuscitation training, clinical resuscitation, and experimental resuscitation research, although papers relating to animal studies will be published only if they are of exceptional interest and related directly to clinical cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Papers relating to trauma are published occasionally but the majority of these concern traumatic cardiac arrest.