混合协作方法对创意数量、质量和协作交互的影响。

IF 1.6 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Min Hae Song, Jaeseo Lim, Hwimin Kim, Jooyong Park
{"title":"混合协作方法对创意数量、质量和协作交互的影响。","authors":"Min Hae Song, Jaeseo Lim, Hwimin Kim, Jooyong Park","doi":"10.1177/00332941251383513","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The hybrid collaboration method, which combines individual and collaborative idea generation sequentially, can help generate more creative ideas compared to collaborating from the beginning, by encouraging active participation during collaboration. While the effectiveness of hybrid collaboration methods varies depending on the combination order of individual and collaborative idea generation, there is ongoing debate regarding the optimal order. To examine the optimal order, this study investigated the effects of the hybrid collaboration method based on the combination order, on the quantity and quality of generated ideas, as well as collaborative interactions. An experiment with 87 participants showed that participants using a hybrid collaboration method generated significantly more ideas than those who collaborated from the beginning. Although no significant differences were found in the quality of all generated ideas across conditions, participants who generated ideas individually before collaborating produced higher-quality top three ideas. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the amount of collaborative interaction, even with reduced collaboration time in the hybrid collaboration methods. Notably, participants who generated ideas individually before collaborating focused more on ideation during their interactions. These findings highlight the potential of hybrid collaboration methods, particularly individual ideation before collaboration, as an effective strategy for enhancing creativity.</p>","PeriodicalId":21149,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Reports","volume":" ","pages":"332941251383513"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of Hybrid Collaboration Methods on Idea Quantity, Quality, and Collaborative Interactions.\",\"authors\":\"Min Hae Song, Jaeseo Lim, Hwimin Kim, Jooyong Park\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00332941251383513\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The hybrid collaboration method, which combines individual and collaborative idea generation sequentially, can help generate more creative ideas compared to collaborating from the beginning, by encouraging active participation during collaboration. While the effectiveness of hybrid collaboration methods varies depending on the combination order of individual and collaborative idea generation, there is ongoing debate regarding the optimal order. To examine the optimal order, this study investigated the effects of the hybrid collaboration method based on the combination order, on the quantity and quality of generated ideas, as well as collaborative interactions. An experiment with 87 participants showed that participants using a hybrid collaboration method generated significantly more ideas than those who collaborated from the beginning. Although no significant differences were found in the quality of all generated ideas across conditions, participants who generated ideas individually before collaborating produced higher-quality top three ideas. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the amount of collaborative interaction, even with reduced collaboration time in the hybrid collaboration methods. Notably, participants who generated ideas individually before collaborating focused more on ideation during their interactions. These findings highlight the potential of hybrid collaboration methods, particularly individual ideation before collaboration, as an effective strategy for enhancing creativity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21149,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychological Reports\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"332941251383513\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychological Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00332941251383513\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Reports","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00332941251383513","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

混合协作方法将个人和协作的想法产生顺序结合在一起,通过鼓励合作过程中的积极参与,与从一开始就协作相比,可以帮助产生更多创造性的想法。虽然混合协作方法的有效性取决于个人和协作想法产生的组合顺序,但关于最佳顺序的争论一直存在。为了检验最优顺序,本研究考察了基于组合顺序的混合协作方法对生成想法的数量和质量以及协作交互的影响。一项有87名参与者参与的实验表明,使用混合协作方法的参与者比那些一开始就合作的参与者产生了更多的想法。尽管在不同条件下,所有创意的质量没有显著差异,但在合作之前单独创意的参与者产生的前三名创意质量更高。此外,即使在混合协作方法中减少了协作时间,在协作交互的数量上也没有显着差异。值得注意的是,在合作之前单独产生想法的参与者在互动过程中更专注于创意。这些发现强调了混合协作方法的潜力,特别是在协作之前的个人创意,作为提高创造力的有效策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Impact of Hybrid Collaboration Methods on Idea Quantity, Quality, and Collaborative Interactions.

The hybrid collaboration method, which combines individual and collaborative idea generation sequentially, can help generate more creative ideas compared to collaborating from the beginning, by encouraging active participation during collaboration. While the effectiveness of hybrid collaboration methods varies depending on the combination order of individual and collaborative idea generation, there is ongoing debate regarding the optimal order. To examine the optimal order, this study investigated the effects of the hybrid collaboration method based on the combination order, on the quantity and quality of generated ideas, as well as collaborative interactions. An experiment with 87 participants showed that participants using a hybrid collaboration method generated significantly more ideas than those who collaborated from the beginning. Although no significant differences were found in the quality of all generated ideas across conditions, participants who generated ideas individually before collaborating produced higher-quality top three ideas. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the amount of collaborative interaction, even with reduced collaboration time in the hybrid collaboration methods. Notably, participants who generated ideas individually before collaborating focused more on ideation during their interactions. These findings highlight the potential of hybrid collaboration methods, particularly individual ideation before collaboration, as an effective strategy for enhancing creativity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychological Reports
Psychological Reports PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
171
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信