减少口腔癌切除及游离皮瓣重建术后手术部位感染的策略。

IF 1.8 Q3 SURGERY
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open Pub Date : 2025-09-24 eCollection Date: 2025-09-01 DOI:10.1097/GOX.0000000000007101
Mikumo Nakakawaji, Ryota Nakamura, Aoi Oyama, Kosuke Mogi, Shunya Nabetani, Hiroto Uchikoshi, Seiko Okumura, Nobuhiro Hanai, Keisuke Takanari
{"title":"减少口腔癌切除及游离皮瓣重建术后手术部位感染的策略。","authors":"Mikumo Nakakawaji, Ryota Nakamura, Aoi Oyama, Kosuke Mogi, Shunya Nabetani, Hiroto Uchikoshi, Seiko Okumura, Nobuhiro Hanai, Keisuke Takanari","doi":"10.1097/GOX.0000000000007101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite numerous efforts to reduce surgical site infection (SSI) in patients undergoing head and neck reconstruction, infection rates have remained high. Recently, we introduced an original perioperative wound management protocol that includes 3 steps: intraoperative irrigation of the surgical field with iodine saline, compression of the dead space in the postoperative period, and oral care by reconstructive surgeons. Here we described our management protocol and reported changes in SSI rates and associated outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 120 consecutive patients who underwent resection and free-flap reconstruction for oral cancers at our institution from 2020 to 2022. The study compared cases with perioperative wound management without our protocol (control group, n = 60) and those with our protocol (study group, n = 60). Factors influencing the infection rates were statistically analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No statistical differences were observed between the 2 groups in patient characteristics. In the univariate logistic regression analysis, perioperative wound management with our protocol (<i>P</i> = 0.012, odds ratio [OR] = 0.350) and age (<i>P</i> = 0.024, OR = 0.963) were significantly associated with infection. In the multivariate analysis, only perioperative wound management with our protocol was significantly correlated with SSI (<i>P</i> = 0.015, OR = 0.353). There was a significant difference in the days nil by mouth (<i>P</i> = 0.014) and the length of hospitalization (<i>P</i> = 0.003) between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our perioperative protocol seemed to be effective in preventing postoperative SSIs, reducing the days of nil by mouth, and shortening hospital stay after oral cancer resection and reconstruction.</p>","PeriodicalId":20149,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","volume":"13 9","pages":"e7101"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12459436/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Strategies for Reducing Surgical Site Infections After Oral Cancer Resection and Free-flap Reconstruction.\",\"authors\":\"Mikumo Nakakawaji, Ryota Nakamura, Aoi Oyama, Kosuke Mogi, Shunya Nabetani, Hiroto Uchikoshi, Seiko Okumura, Nobuhiro Hanai, Keisuke Takanari\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/GOX.0000000000007101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite numerous efforts to reduce surgical site infection (SSI) in patients undergoing head and neck reconstruction, infection rates have remained high. Recently, we introduced an original perioperative wound management protocol that includes 3 steps: intraoperative irrigation of the surgical field with iodine saline, compression of the dead space in the postoperative period, and oral care by reconstructive surgeons. Here we described our management protocol and reported changes in SSI rates and associated outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 120 consecutive patients who underwent resection and free-flap reconstruction for oral cancers at our institution from 2020 to 2022. The study compared cases with perioperative wound management without our protocol (control group, n = 60) and those with our protocol (study group, n = 60). Factors influencing the infection rates were statistically analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No statistical differences were observed between the 2 groups in patient characteristics. In the univariate logistic regression analysis, perioperative wound management with our protocol (<i>P</i> = 0.012, odds ratio [OR] = 0.350) and age (<i>P</i> = 0.024, OR = 0.963) were significantly associated with infection. In the multivariate analysis, only perioperative wound management with our protocol was significantly correlated with SSI (<i>P</i> = 0.015, OR = 0.353). There was a significant difference in the days nil by mouth (<i>P</i> = 0.014) and the length of hospitalization (<i>P</i> = 0.003) between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our perioperative protocol seemed to be effective in preventing postoperative SSIs, reducing the days of nil by mouth, and shortening hospital stay after oral cancer resection and reconstruction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20149,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open\",\"volume\":\"13 9\",\"pages\":\"e7101\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12459436/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000007101\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000007101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管许多努力减少手术部位感染(SSI)的患者接受头颈部重建,感染率仍然很高。最近,我们介绍了一种新颖的围手术期伤口处理方案,包括3个步骤:术中碘盐水冲洗术野,术后压迫死腔,以及由重建外科医生进行口腔护理。在这里,我们描述了我们的管理方案,并报告了SSI发生率和相关结果的变化。方法:本研究纳入了2020年至2022年在我院接受口腔癌切除术和游离皮瓣重建的120例连续患者。本研究比较了未采用我们的方案的围手术期伤口处理病例(对照组,n = 60)和采用我们的方案的患者(研究组,n = 60)。统计分析影响感染率的因素。结果:两组患者特征差异无统计学意义。在单因素logistic回归分析中,我们的方案围手术期伤口处理(P = 0.012,优势比[OR] = 0.350)和年龄(P = 0.024, OR = 0.963)与感染显著相关。在多因素分析中,只有围手术期伤口处理与SSI显著相关(P = 0.015, OR = 0.353)。两组间口服天数(P = 0.014)和住院时间(P = 0.003)差异有统计学意义。结论:我们的围手术期方案似乎可以有效预防术后ssi,减少口服零栓塞天数,缩短口腔癌切除重建后的住院时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Strategies for Reducing Surgical Site Infections After Oral Cancer Resection and Free-flap Reconstruction.

Background: Despite numerous efforts to reduce surgical site infection (SSI) in patients undergoing head and neck reconstruction, infection rates have remained high. Recently, we introduced an original perioperative wound management protocol that includes 3 steps: intraoperative irrigation of the surgical field with iodine saline, compression of the dead space in the postoperative period, and oral care by reconstructive surgeons. Here we described our management protocol and reported changes in SSI rates and associated outcomes.

Methods: This study included 120 consecutive patients who underwent resection and free-flap reconstruction for oral cancers at our institution from 2020 to 2022. The study compared cases with perioperative wound management without our protocol (control group, n = 60) and those with our protocol (study group, n = 60). Factors influencing the infection rates were statistically analyzed.

Results: No statistical differences were observed between the 2 groups in patient characteristics. In the univariate logistic regression analysis, perioperative wound management with our protocol (P = 0.012, odds ratio [OR] = 0.350) and age (P = 0.024, OR = 0.963) were significantly associated with infection. In the multivariate analysis, only perioperative wound management with our protocol was significantly correlated with SSI (P = 0.015, OR = 0.353). There was a significant difference in the days nil by mouth (P = 0.014) and the length of hospitalization (P = 0.003) between the groups.

Conclusions: Our perioperative protocol seemed to be effective in preventing postoperative SSIs, reducing the days of nil by mouth, and shortening hospital stay after oral cancer resection and reconstruction.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
13.30%
发文量
1584
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open is an open access, peer reviewed, international journal focusing on global plastic and reconstructive surgery.Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open publishes on all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including basic science/experimental studies pertinent to the field and also clinical articles on such topics as: breast reconstruction, head and neck surgery, pediatric and craniofacial surgery, hand and microsurgery, wound healing, and cosmetic and aesthetic surgery. Clinical studies, experimental articles, ideas and innovations, and techniques and case reports are all welcome article types. Manuscript submission is open to all surgeons, researchers, and other health care providers world-wide who wish to communicate their research results on topics related to plastic and reconstructive surgery. Furthermore, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open, a complimentary journal to Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, provides an open access venue for the publication of those research studies sponsored by private and public funding agencies that require open access publication of study results. Its mission is to disseminate high quality, peer reviewed research in plastic and reconstructive surgery to the widest possible global audience, through an open access platform. As an open access journal, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open offers its content for free to any viewer. Authors of articles retain their copyright to the materials published. Additionally, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open provides rapid review and publication of accepted papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信