{"title":"减少口腔癌切除及游离皮瓣重建术后手术部位感染的策略。","authors":"Mikumo Nakakawaji, Ryota Nakamura, Aoi Oyama, Kosuke Mogi, Shunya Nabetani, Hiroto Uchikoshi, Seiko Okumura, Nobuhiro Hanai, Keisuke Takanari","doi":"10.1097/GOX.0000000000007101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite numerous efforts to reduce surgical site infection (SSI) in patients undergoing head and neck reconstruction, infection rates have remained high. Recently, we introduced an original perioperative wound management protocol that includes 3 steps: intraoperative irrigation of the surgical field with iodine saline, compression of the dead space in the postoperative period, and oral care by reconstructive surgeons. Here we described our management protocol and reported changes in SSI rates and associated outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 120 consecutive patients who underwent resection and free-flap reconstruction for oral cancers at our institution from 2020 to 2022. The study compared cases with perioperative wound management without our protocol (control group, n = 60) and those with our protocol (study group, n = 60). Factors influencing the infection rates were statistically analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No statistical differences were observed between the 2 groups in patient characteristics. In the univariate logistic regression analysis, perioperative wound management with our protocol (<i>P</i> = 0.012, odds ratio [OR] = 0.350) and age (<i>P</i> = 0.024, OR = 0.963) were significantly associated with infection. In the multivariate analysis, only perioperative wound management with our protocol was significantly correlated with SSI (<i>P</i> = 0.015, OR = 0.353). There was a significant difference in the days nil by mouth (<i>P</i> = 0.014) and the length of hospitalization (<i>P</i> = 0.003) between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our perioperative protocol seemed to be effective in preventing postoperative SSIs, reducing the days of nil by mouth, and shortening hospital stay after oral cancer resection and reconstruction.</p>","PeriodicalId":20149,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","volume":"13 9","pages":"e7101"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12459436/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Strategies for Reducing Surgical Site Infections After Oral Cancer Resection and Free-flap Reconstruction.\",\"authors\":\"Mikumo Nakakawaji, Ryota Nakamura, Aoi Oyama, Kosuke Mogi, Shunya Nabetani, Hiroto Uchikoshi, Seiko Okumura, Nobuhiro Hanai, Keisuke Takanari\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/GOX.0000000000007101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite numerous efforts to reduce surgical site infection (SSI) in patients undergoing head and neck reconstruction, infection rates have remained high. Recently, we introduced an original perioperative wound management protocol that includes 3 steps: intraoperative irrigation of the surgical field with iodine saline, compression of the dead space in the postoperative period, and oral care by reconstructive surgeons. Here we described our management protocol and reported changes in SSI rates and associated outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 120 consecutive patients who underwent resection and free-flap reconstruction for oral cancers at our institution from 2020 to 2022. The study compared cases with perioperative wound management without our protocol (control group, n = 60) and those with our protocol (study group, n = 60). Factors influencing the infection rates were statistically analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No statistical differences were observed between the 2 groups in patient characteristics. In the univariate logistic regression analysis, perioperative wound management with our protocol (<i>P</i> = 0.012, odds ratio [OR] = 0.350) and age (<i>P</i> = 0.024, OR = 0.963) were significantly associated with infection. In the multivariate analysis, only perioperative wound management with our protocol was significantly correlated with SSI (<i>P</i> = 0.015, OR = 0.353). There was a significant difference in the days nil by mouth (<i>P</i> = 0.014) and the length of hospitalization (<i>P</i> = 0.003) between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our perioperative protocol seemed to be effective in preventing postoperative SSIs, reducing the days of nil by mouth, and shortening hospital stay after oral cancer resection and reconstruction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20149,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open\",\"volume\":\"13 9\",\"pages\":\"e7101\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12459436/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000007101\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000007101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Strategies for Reducing Surgical Site Infections After Oral Cancer Resection and Free-flap Reconstruction.
Background: Despite numerous efforts to reduce surgical site infection (SSI) in patients undergoing head and neck reconstruction, infection rates have remained high. Recently, we introduced an original perioperative wound management protocol that includes 3 steps: intraoperative irrigation of the surgical field with iodine saline, compression of the dead space in the postoperative period, and oral care by reconstructive surgeons. Here we described our management protocol and reported changes in SSI rates and associated outcomes.
Methods: This study included 120 consecutive patients who underwent resection and free-flap reconstruction for oral cancers at our institution from 2020 to 2022. The study compared cases with perioperative wound management without our protocol (control group, n = 60) and those with our protocol (study group, n = 60). Factors influencing the infection rates were statistically analyzed.
Results: No statistical differences were observed between the 2 groups in patient characteristics. In the univariate logistic regression analysis, perioperative wound management with our protocol (P = 0.012, odds ratio [OR] = 0.350) and age (P = 0.024, OR = 0.963) were significantly associated with infection. In the multivariate analysis, only perioperative wound management with our protocol was significantly correlated with SSI (P = 0.015, OR = 0.353). There was a significant difference in the days nil by mouth (P = 0.014) and the length of hospitalization (P = 0.003) between the groups.
Conclusions: Our perioperative protocol seemed to be effective in preventing postoperative SSIs, reducing the days of nil by mouth, and shortening hospital stay after oral cancer resection and reconstruction.
期刊介绍:
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open is an open access, peer reviewed, international journal focusing on global plastic and reconstructive surgery.Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open publishes on all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including basic science/experimental studies pertinent to the field and also clinical articles on such topics as: breast reconstruction, head and neck surgery, pediatric and craniofacial surgery, hand and microsurgery, wound healing, and cosmetic and aesthetic surgery. Clinical studies, experimental articles, ideas and innovations, and techniques and case reports are all welcome article types. Manuscript submission is open to all surgeons, researchers, and other health care providers world-wide who wish to communicate their research results on topics related to plastic and reconstructive surgery. Furthermore, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open, a complimentary journal to Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, provides an open access venue for the publication of those research studies sponsored by private and public funding agencies that require open access publication of study results. Its mission is to disseminate high quality, peer reviewed research in plastic and reconstructive surgery to the widest possible global audience, through an open access platform. As an open access journal, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open offers its content for free to any viewer. Authors of articles retain their copyright to the materials published. Additionally, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open provides rapid review and publication of accepted papers.