约旦外科医生对游离皮瓣手术的认知和局限性:一项横断面研究。

IF 1.8 Q3 SURGERY
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open Pub Date : 2025-09-24 eCollection Date: 2025-09-01 DOI:10.1097/GOX.0000000000007079
Saleh Abualhaj, Mosleh M Abualhaj, Mohammad Aljaidi, Anas As'ad, Mohammad Aladaileh, Omar S Mansour, Lina Alshadfan
{"title":"约旦外科医生对游离皮瓣手术的认知和局限性:一项横断面研究。","authors":"Saleh Abualhaj, Mosleh M Abualhaj, Mohammad Aljaidi, Anas As'ad, Mohammad Aladaileh, Omar S Mansour, Lina Alshadfan","doi":"10.1097/GOX.0000000000007079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Free flap procedures are essential in reconstructive surgery, yet their use is influenced by multiple factors, including infrastructure, training, financial constraints, and surgeon experience. This study explored the perceptions of Jordanian surgeons regarding the limitations of free flap procedures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey was conducted among Jordanian surgeons, including plastic surgeons, neurosurgeons, ophthalmologists, orthopedic surgeons, and vascular surgeons. Data were collected through a structured questionnaire, assessing infrastructure, resources, training, education, funding, insurance, and surgeon experience. Statistical analysis was performed using R version 4.2.1, and comparisons between plastic and reconstructive surgeons and other surgical specialists were made using chi-square and independent <i>t</i> tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A survey of 120 surgeons revealed that 70% had access to sufficient resources, but 55% had limited access to specialized tools and concerns about institutional budgeting and equipment maintenance. Additionally, 50% had no formal training in free flap procedures, whereas 40% received training during residency. Financial constraints influenced decision-making, with 53% citing affordability and insurance issues. Experience was a key factor, with 45.8% reporting limited exposure to free flaps and 88% recognizing surgeon expertise as critical to success. Plastic surgeons were more likely to have formal training and greater experience with free flap procedures than other specialists (<i>P</i> = 0.04, 0.002, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study highlighted challenges in the adoption of free flap procedures in Jordan, such as limited access to specialized tools, inadequate training, financial constraints, and disparities in surgeon experience, emphasizing the need for structured training programs, improved institutional support, and improved insurance policies.</p>","PeriodicalId":20149,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","volume":"13 9","pages":"e7079"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12459502/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perceptions and Limitations of Free Flap Procedures Among Surgeons in Jordan: A Cross-sectional Study.\",\"authors\":\"Saleh Abualhaj, Mosleh M Abualhaj, Mohammad Aljaidi, Anas As'ad, Mohammad Aladaileh, Omar S Mansour, Lina Alshadfan\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/GOX.0000000000007079\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Free flap procedures are essential in reconstructive surgery, yet their use is influenced by multiple factors, including infrastructure, training, financial constraints, and surgeon experience. This study explored the perceptions of Jordanian surgeons regarding the limitations of free flap procedures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey was conducted among Jordanian surgeons, including plastic surgeons, neurosurgeons, ophthalmologists, orthopedic surgeons, and vascular surgeons. Data were collected through a structured questionnaire, assessing infrastructure, resources, training, education, funding, insurance, and surgeon experience. Statistical analysis was performed using R version 4.2.1, and comparisons between plastic and reconstructive surgeons and other surgical specialists were made using chi-square and independent <i>t</i> tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A survey of 120 surgeons revealed that 70% had access to sufficient resources, but 55% had limited access to specialized tools and concerns about institutional budgeting and equipment maintenance. Additionally, 50% had no formal training in free flap procedures, whereas 40% received training during residency. Financial constraints influenced decision-making, with 53% citing affordability and insurance issues. Experience was a key factor, with 45.8% reporting limited exposure to free flaps and 88% recognizing surgeon expertise as critical to success. Plastic surgeons were more likely to have formal training and greater experience with free flap procedures than other specialists (<i>P</i> = 0.04, 0.002, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study highlighted challenges in the adoption of free flap procedures in Jordan, such as limited access to specialized tools, inadequate training, financial constraints, and disparities in surgeon experience, emphasizing the need for structured training programs, improved institutional support, and improved insurance policies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20149,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open\",\"volume\":\"13 9\",\"pages\":\"e7079\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12459502/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000007079\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000007079","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:游离皮瓣手术在重建手术中是必不可少的,但其使用受到多种因素的影响,包括基础设施、培训、财政限制和外科医生经验。本研究探讨了约旦外科医生对游离皮瓣手术局限性的看法。方法:对约旦外科医生进行横断面调查,包括整形外科医生、神经外科医生、眼科医生、骨科医生和血管外科医生。通过结构化问卷收集数据,评估基础设施、资源、培训、教育、资金、保险和外科医生经验。采用R 4.2.1版本进行统计分析,整形重建外科医生与其他外科专家之间的比较采用卡方检验和独立t检验。结果:一项对120名外科医生的调查显示,70%的外科医生可以获得足够的资源,但55%的外科医生获得专业工具的机会有限,并且担心机构预算和设备维护。此外,50%的患者没有接受过自由皮瓣手术的正式培训,而40%的患者在住院期间接受过培训。财务限制影响了决策,53%的人认为负担能力和保险问题。经验是关键因素,45.8%的人表示游离皮瓣暴露有限,88%的人认为外科医生的专业知识是成功的关键。与其他专家相比,整形外科医生更有可能接受过正式的培训,并有更多的自由皮瓣手术经验(P分别= 0.04和0.002)。结论:该研究强调了在约旦采用自由皮瓣手术所面临的挑战,如获得专业工具的机会有限、培训不足、财政限制和外科医生经验的差异,强调了结构化培训计划、改进机构支持和改进保险政策的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Perceptions and Limitations of Free Flap Procedures Among Surgeons in Jordan: A Cross-sectional Study.

Background: Free flap procedures are essential in reconstructive surgery, yet their use is influenced by multiple factors, including infrastructure, training, financial constraints, and surgeon experience. This study explored the perceptions of Jordanian surgeons regarding the limitations of free flap procedures.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among Jordanian surgeons, including plastic surgeons, neurosurgeons, ophthalmologists, orthopedic surgeons, and vascular surgeons. Data were collected through a structured questionnaire, assessing infrastructure, resources, training, education, funding, insurance, and surgeon experience. Statistical analysis was performed using R version 4.2.1, and comparisons between plastic and reconstructive surgeons and other surgical specialists were made using chi-square and independent t tests.

Results: A survey of 120 surgeons revealed that 70% had access to sufficient resources, but 55% had limited access to specialized tools and concerns about institutional budgeting and equipment maintenance. Additionally, 50% had no formal training in free flap procedures, whereas 40% received training during residency. Financial constraints influenced decision-making, with 53% citing affordability and insurance issues. Experience was a key factor, with 45.8% reporting limited exposure to free flaps and 88% recognizing surgeon expertise as critical to success. Plastic surgeons were more likely to have formal training and greater experience with free flap procedures than other specialists (P = 0.04, 0.002, respectively).

Conclusions: The study highlighted challenges in the adoption of free flap procedures in Jordan, such as limited access to specialized tools, inadequate training, financial constraints, and disparities in surgeon experience, emphasizing the need for structured training programs, improved institutional support, and improved insurance policies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
13.30%
发文量
1584
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open is an open access, peer reviewed, international journal focusing on global plastic and reconstructive surgery.Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open publishes on all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including basic science/experimental studies pertinent to the field and also clinical articles on such topics as: breast reconstruction, head and neck surgery, pediatric and craniofacial surgery, hand and microsurgery, wound healing, and cosmetic and aesthetic surgery. Clinical studies, experimental articles, ideas and innovations, and techniques and case reports are all welcome article types. Manuscript submission is open to all surgeons, researchers, and other health care providers world-wide who wish to communicate their research results on topics related to plastic and reconstructive surgery. Furthermore, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open, a complimentary journal to Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, provides an open access venue for the publication of those research studies sponsored by private and public funding agencies that require open access publication of study results. Its mission is to disseminate high quality, peer reviewed research in plastic and reconstructive surgery to the widest possible global audience, through an open access platform. As an open access journal, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open offers its content for free to any viewer. Authors of articles retain their copyright to the materials published. Additionally, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open provides rapid review and publication of accepted papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信