OMNImet®•肠道收集试剂盒支持粪便短链脂肪酸的样品收集和环境温度保存。

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Jemma Cleminson, Caroline Kerbiriou, Shona McKirdy, Lauren Beck, David I Campbell, Andrew R Gennery, Janet E Berrington, Konstantinos Gerasimidis, Christopher J Stewart
{"title":"OMNImet®•肠道收集试剂盒支持粪便短链脂肪酸的样品收集和环境温度保存。","authors":"Jemma Cleminson, Caroline Kerbiriou, Shona McKirdy, Lauren Beck, David I Campbell, Andrew R Gennery, Janet E Berrington, Konstantinos Gerasimidis, Christopher J Stewart","doi":"10.1007/s11306-025-02322-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) are microbial metabolites that play critical roles in health. As SCFAs are highly volatile molecules and ongoing bacterial metabolism in faecal samples collected can cause compositional shifts, quick SCFA preservation at the point of sample collection is of utmost importance for valid results.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the OMNImet®•GUT kit as an immediate preservation method that stabilises SCFAs at room temperature compared to a standardised laboratory sodium hydroxide method.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Faecal samples from 12 participants were included. For each sample, 1 g faeces was aliquoted into 2.5 ml OMNImet®•GUT buffer and 1 g faeces was aliquoted into 2.5 ml sodium hydroxide (current laboratory method). SCFA profiles were quantified at zero, 24-, and 48-h using gas chromatography. SCFA profiles were compared across patients, preservation method, and time point.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results showed that most SCFA profiles were stable and comparable between methods. The sample donor explained the most variance and was the most significant factor associated with the SCFA profiles, independent of the collection kit or duration at room temperature (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.761, P = 0.001). However, the type of preservation method was also statistically significant (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.090, P < 0.001). Time did not significantly impact on SCFA profiles up to 48 h (P = 0.582).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings support OMNImet®•GUT as a practical alternative for SCFA preservation, particularly for multicentre studies where immediate sample collection can be logistically challenging, but it is important to use a consistent collection method within studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":18506,"journal":{"name":"Metabolomics","volume":"21 5","pages":"139"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"OMNImet®•GUT collection kit supports sample collection and ambient temperature preservation of faecal short chain fatty acids.\",\"authors\":\"Jemma Cleminson, Caroline Kerbiriou, Shona McKirdy, Lauren Beck, David I Campbell, Andrew R Gennery, Janet E Berrington, Konstantinos Gerasimidis, Christopher J Stewart\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11306-025-02322-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) are microbial metabolites that play critical roles in health. As SCFAs are highly volatile molecules and ongoing bacterial metabolism in faecal samples collected can cause compositional shifts, quick SCFA preservation at the point of sample collection is of utmost importance for valid results.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the OMNImet®•GUT kit as an immediate preservation method that stabilises SCFAs at room temperature compared to a standardised laboratory sodium hydroxide method.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Faecal samples from 12 participants were included. For each sample, 1 g faeces was aliquoted into 2.5 ml OMNImet®•GUT buffer and 1 g faeces was aliquoted into 2.5 ml sodium hydroxide (current laboratory method). SCFA profiles were quantified at zero, 24-, and 48-h using gas chromatography. SCFA profiles were compared across patients, preservation method, and time point.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results showed that most SCFA profiles were stable and comparable between methods. The sample donor explained the most variance and was the most significant factor associated with the SCFA profiles, independent of the collection kit or duration at room temperature (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.761, P = 0.001). However, the type of preservation method was also statistically significant (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.090, P < 0.001). Time did not significantly impact on SCFA profiles up to 48 h (P = 0.582).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings support OMNImet®•GUT as a practical alternative for SCFA preservation, particularly for multicentre studies where immediate sample collection can be logistically challenging, but it is important to use a consistent collection method within studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18506,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Metabolomics\",\"volume\":\"21 5\",\"pages\":\"139\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Metabolomics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11306-025-02322-3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Metabolomics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11306-025-02322-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

短链脂肪酸(SCFAs)是一种微生物代谢产物,在健康中起着至关重要的作用。由于SCFA是高度挥发性的分子,收集的粪便样品中持续的细菌代谢会导致成分变化,因此在样品收集点快速保存SCFA对于获得有效结果至关重要。目的:本研究旨在评估OMNImet®•GUT试剂盒作为一种即时保存方法,与标准化实验室氢氧化钠方法相比,在室温下稳定SCFAs。方法:选取12例受试者的粪便样本。对于每个样品,将1g粪便放入2.5 ml OMNImet®•GUT缓冲液中,并将1g粪便放入2.5 ml氢氧化钠(当前实验室方法)中。在0、24和48小时用气相色谱法定量SCFA谱。比较不同患者、保存方法和时间点的SCFA谱。结果:结果表明,大多数SCFA谱在不同方法之间具有稳定性和可比性。样品供体解释了最大的方差,是与SCFA谱相关的最重要因素,与采集试剂盒或室温持续时间无关(R2 = 0.761, P = 0.001)。然而,保存方法的类型也具有统计学意义(R2 = 0.090, P)。结论:这些发现支持OMNImet®•GUT作为SCFA保存的实用替代方案,特别是对于多中心研究,即时样本收集可能具有后勤挑战性,但重要的是在研究中使用一致的收集方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
OMNImet®•GUT collection kit supports sample collection and ambient temperature preservation of faecal short chain fatty acids.

Introduction: Short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) are microbial metabolites that play critical roles in health. As SCFAs are highly volatile molecules and ongoing bacterial metabolism in faecal samples collected can cause compositional shifts, quick SCFA preservation at the point of sample collection is of utmost importance for valid results.

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the OMNImet®•GUT kit as an immediate preservation method that stabilises SCFAs at room temperature compared to a standardised laboratory sodium hydroxide method.

Methods: Faecal samples from 12 participants were included. For each sample, 1 g faeces was aliquoted into 2.5 ml OMNImet®•GUT buffer and 1 g faeces was aliquoted into 2.5 ml sodium hydroxide (current laboratory method). SCFA profiles were quantified at zero, 24-, and 48-h using gas chromatography. SCFA profiles were compared across patients, preservation method, and time point.

Results: Results showed that most SCFA profiles were stable and comparable between methods. The sample donor explained the most variance and was the most significant factor associated with the SCFA profiles, independent of the collection kit or duration at room temperature (R2 = 0.761, P = 0.001). However, the type of preservation method was also statistically significant (R2 = 0.090, P < 0.001). Time did not significantly impact on SCFA profiles up to 48 h (P = 0.582).

Conclusion: These findings support OMNImet®•GUT as a practical alternative for SCFA preservation, particularly for multicentre studies where immediate sample collection can be logistically challenging, but it is important to use a consistent collection method within studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Metabolomics
Metabolomics 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
2.80%
发文量
84
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Metabolomics publishes current research regarding the development of technology platforms for metabolomics. This includes, but is not limited to: metabolomic applications within man, including pre-clinical and clinical pharmacometabolomics for precision medicine metabolic profiling and fingerprinting metabolite target analysis metabolomic applications within animals, plants and microbes transcriptomics and proteomics in systems biology Metabolomics is an indispensable platform for researchers using new post-genomics approaches, to discover networks and interactions between metabolites, pharmaceuticals, SNPs, proteins and more. Its articles go beyond the genome and metabolome, by including original clinical study material together with big data from new emerging technologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信