低通量1064nm皮秒激光加/不加微透镜阵列治疗黄褐斑的疗效和安全性:一项随机、裂面对照研究

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Xianglei Wu, Xue Wang, Xiaoxi Lin, Ying Shang, Qingqing Cen, Zhen Zhang
{"title":"低通量1064nm皮秒激光加/不加微透镜阵列治疗黄褐斑的疗效和安全性:一项随机、裂面对照研究","authors":"Xianglei Wu, Xue Wang, Xiaoxi Lin, Ying Shang, Qingqing Cen, Zhen Zhang","doi":"10.1007/s10103-025-04655-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Low-fluence picosecond (LFPS) neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd: YAG) 1064 nm laser has emerged as a promising treatment for melasma; however, its optimal strategy remains unclear. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of LFPS combined with microlens arrays (MLA) compared with LFPS alone in treating melasma. Thirty patients with melasma received LFPS alone on one side of the face (control [C] side) and LFPS with MLA on the other (treatment [T] side). Treatments were performed at four-week intervals for five sessions. Standardized imaging, VISIA-CR, and assessments using the Physician's Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (P-GAIS) and the Melasma Area and Severity Index (MASI) score, were performed at baseline, and at one-, three-, and six-months post-treatment. Recurrences and adverse effects were recorded. MASI scores significantly reduced at all time points compared with baseline (ΔMASI: 3.23, 3.35, and 2.98, respectively). The P-GAIS assessment showed that 3 patients rated 1 point, 5 rated 2, 14 rated 3, and 8 rated 4. No significant adverse events occurred. At six months, recurrence was lower on the T side than on the C side (1 vs. 6 patients; p< 0.05). VISIA-CR analysis showed significant spot reduction on both sides, with no statistically significant difference (p>0.05). Additionally, texture and pore metrics improved on the T side, whereas no significant changes were observed on the C side. LFPS with MLA improved melasma severity, reduced recurrence rates, and enhanced skin texture and pores compared with LFPS alone, offering a safe, effective treatment option.</p>","PeriodicalId":17978,"journal":{"name":"Lasers in Medical Science","volume":"40 1","pages":"387"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and safety of low-fluence 1064 nm picosecond laser with/without micro-lens arrays for melasma treatment: a randomized, split-face controlled study.\",\"authors\":\"Xianglei Wu, Xue Wang, Xiaoxi Lin, Ying Shang, Qingqing Cen, Zhen Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10103-025-04655-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Low-fluence picosecond (LFPS) neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd: YAG) 1064 nm laser has emerged as a promising treatment for melasma; however, its optimal strategy remains unclear. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of LFPS combined with microlens arrays (MLA) compared with LFPS alone in treating melasma. Thirty patients with melasma received LFPS alone on one side of the face (control [C] side) and LFPS with MLA on the other (treatment [T] side). Treatments were performed at four-week intervals for five sessions. Standardized imaging, VISIA-CR, and assessments using the Physician's Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (P-GAIS) and the Melasma Area and Severity Index (MASI) score, were performed at baseline, and at one-, three-, and six-months post-treatment. Recurrences and adverse effects were recorded. MASI scores significantly reduced at all time points compared with baseline (ΔMASI: 3.23, 3.35, and 2.98, respectively). The P-GAIS assessment showed that 3 patients rated 1 point, 5 rated 2, 14 rated 3, and 8 rated 4. No significant adverse events occurred. At six months, recurrence was lower on the T side than on the C side (1 vs. 6 patients; p< 0.05). VISIA-CR analysis showed significant spot reduction on both sides, with no statistically significant difference (p>0.05). Additionally, texture and pore metrics improved on the T side, whereas no significant changes were observed on the C side. LFPS with MLA improved melasma severity, reduced recurrence rates, and enhanced skin texture and pores compared with LFPS alone, offering a safe, effective treatment option.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17978,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lasers in Medical Science\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"387\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lasers in Medical Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-025-04655-w\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lasers in Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-025-04655-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

低通量皮秒(LFPS)掺钕钇铝石榴石(Nd: YAG) 1064 nm激光已成为治疗黄褐斑的一种有前途的方法;然而,它的最佳策略仍不清楚。比较LFPS联合微透镜阵列(MLA)治疗黄褐斑的疗效和安全性。30例黄褐斑患者在一侧面部单独接受LFPS(对照[C]侧),另一侧接受LFPS联合MLA(治疗[T]侧)。治疗每4周进行一次,共5次。在基线、治疗后1个月、3个月和6个月进行标准化成像、VISIA-CR和使用医师整体美学改善量表(P-GAIS)和黄褐斑面积和严重程度指数(MASI)评分的评估。记录复发情况和不良反应。与基线相比,MASI得分在所有时间点均显著降低(ΔMASI:分别为3.23、3.35和2.98)。P-GAIS评分1分3例,2分5例,3分14例,4分8例。无明显不良事件发生。6个月时,T侧的复发率低于C侧(1例vs. 6例;p< 0.05)。VISIA-CR分析显示,双方斑点明显减少,差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。此外,T侧的纹理和孔隙指标有所改善,而C侧没有明显变化。与单独使用LFPS相比,LFPS联合MLA改善了黄褐斑的严重程度,降低了复发率,改善了皮肤质地和毛孔,提供了安全有效的治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy and safety of low-fluence 1064 nm picosecond laser with/without micro-lens arrays for melasma treatment: a randomized, split-face controlled study.

Low-fluence picosecond (LFPS) neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd: YAG) 1064 nm laser has emerged as a promising treatment for melasma; however, its optimal strategy remains unclear. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of LFPS combined with microlens arrays (MLA) compared with LFPS alone in treating melasma. Thirty patients with melasma received LFPS alone on one side of the face (control [C] side) and LFPS with MLA on the other (treatment [T] side). Treatments were performed at four-week intervals for five sessions. Standardized imaging, VISIA-CR, and assessments using the Physician's Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (P-GAIS) and the Melasma Area and Severity Index (MASI) score, were performed at baseline, and at one-, three-, and six-months post-treatment. Recurrences and adverse effects were recorded. MASI scores significantly reduced at all time points compared with baseline (ΔMASI: 3.23, 3.35, and 2.98, respectively). The P-GAIS assessment showed that 3 patients rated 1 point, 5 rated 2, 14 rated 3, and 8 rated 4. No significant adverse events occurred. At six months, recurrence was lower on the T side than on the C side (1 vs. 6 patients; p< 0.05). VISIA-CR analysis showed significant spot reduction on both sides, with no statistically significant difference (p>0.05). Additionally, texture and pore metrics improved on the T side, whereas no significant changes were observed on the C side. LFPS with MLA improved melasma severity, reduced recurrence rates, and enhanced skin texture and pores compared with LFPS alone, offering a safe, effective treatment option.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Lasers in Medical Science
Lasers in Medical Science 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
192
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Lasers in Medical Science (LIMS) has established itself as the leading international journal in the rapidly expanding field of medical and dental applications of lasers and light. It provides a forum for the publication of papers on the technical, experimental, and clinical aspects of the use of medical lasers, including lasers in surgery, endoscopy, angioplasty, hyperthermia of tumors, and photodynamic therapy. In addition to medical laser applications, LIMS presents high-quality manuscripts on a wide range of dental topics, including aesthetic dentistry, endodontics, orthodontics, and prosthodontics. The journal publishes articles on the medical and dental applications of novel laser technologies, light delivery systems, sensors to monitor laser effects, basic laser-tissue interactions, and the modeling of laser-tissue interactions. Beyond laser applications, LIMS features articles relating to the use of non-laser light-tissue interactions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信