抗淀粉样蛋白单克隆抗体用于阿尔茨海默病:证据、ARIA风险和精确患者选择。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Amer E Alkhalifa, Abdulrahman Al Mokhlf, Hande Ali, Nour F Al-Ghraiybah, Vasiliki Syropoulou
{"title":"抗淀粉样蛋白单克隆抗体用于阿尔茨海默病:证据、ARIA风险和精确患者选择。","authors":"Amer E Alkhalifa, Abdulrahman Al Mokhlf, Hande Ali, Nour F Al-Ghraiybah, Vasiliki Syropoulou","doi":"10.3390/jpm15090437","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common cause of dementia, pathologically defined by extracellular amyloid-β (Aβ) plaques and intracellular tau neurofibrillary tangles. Recent U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approvals of anti-amyloid monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) aducanumab, lecanemab, and donanemab represent the first disease-modifying therapies for early AD. These therapies have generated both optimism and controversy due to modest efficacy and safety concerns, particularly amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIAs). This review synthesizes current evidence on the efficacy, safety, and biomarker-guided use of anti-Aβ mAbs in AD. <b>Methods:</b> We searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar to 31 July 2025 for studies on anti-amyloid mAbs in AD. Sources included peer-reviewed articles and regulatory reports. The extracted data covered study design, population, amyloid confirmation, dosing, outcomes, biomarkers, ARIA incidence, and management. <b>Results:</b> Anti-amyloid mAbs consistently demonstrated robust amyloid clearance and modest slowing of clinical decline in early symptomatic AD. Differences emerged across agents in efficacy signals, safety profiles, and regulatory outcomes. Lecanemab and donanemab showed more consistent cognitive benefits, while aducanumab yielded mixed findings, leading to its withdrawal. ARIAs were the most frequent adverse events, occurring more often in APOE ε4 carriers and typically during early treatment. Biomarker analyses also revealed favorable downstream effects, including reductions in phosphorylated tau and markers of astroglial injury, supporting engagement of disease biology. <b>Conclusions:</b> Anti-amyloid mAbs provide proof of concept for AD modification, with the greatest benefit in early disease stages and moderate tau burden. Optimal use requires biomarker confirmation of the amyloid, careful tau staging, and genetic risk assessment. While limitations remain, these therapies represent a pivotal step toward precision neurology and may serve as a foundation for multimodal strategies targeting tau, neuroinflammation, and vascular pathology.</p>","PeriodicalId":16722,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personalized Medicine","volume":"15 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12470750/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anti-Amyloid Monoclonal Antibodies for Alzheimer's Disease: Evidence, ARIA Risk, and Precision Patient Selection.\",\"authors\":\"Amer E Alkhalifa, Abdulrahman Al Mokhlf, Hande Ali, Nour F Al-Ghraiybah, Vasiliki Syropoulou\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/jpm15090437\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common cause of dementia, pathologically defined by extracellular amyloid-β (Aβ) plaques and intracellular tau neurofibrillary tangles. Recent U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approvals of anti-amyloid monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) aducanumab, lecanemab, and donanemab represent the first disease-modifying therapies for early AD. These therapies have generated both optimism and controversy due to modest efficacy and safety concerns, particularly amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIAs). This review synthesizes current evidence on the efficacy, safety, and biomarker-guided use of anti-Aβ mAbs in AD. <b>Methods:</b> We searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar to 31 July 2025 for studies on anti-amyloid mAbs in AD. Sources included peer-reviewed articles and regulatory reports. The extracted data covered study design, population, amyloid confirmation, dosing, outcomes, biomarkers, ARIA incidence, and management. <b>Results:</b> Anti-amyloid mAbs consistently demonstrated robust amyloid clearance and modest slowing of clinical decline in early symptomatic AD. Differences emerged across agents in efficacy signals, safety profiles, and regulatory outcomes. Lecanemab and donanemab showed more consistent cognitive benefits, while aducanumab yielded mixed findings, leading to its withdrawal. ARIAs were the most frequent adverse events, occurring more often in APOE ε4 carriers and typically during early treatment. Biomarker analyses also revealed favorable downstream effects, including reductions in phosphorylated tau and markers of astroglial injury, supporting engagement of disease biology. <b>Conclusions:</b> Anti-amyloid mAbs provide proof of concept for AD modification, with the greatest benefit in early disease stages and moderate tau burden. Optimal use requires biomarker confirmation of the amyloid, careful tau staging, and genetic risk assessment. While limitations remain, these therapies represent a pivotal step toward precision neurology and may serve as a foundation for multimodal strategies targeting tau, neuroinflammation, and vascular pathology.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16722,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Personalized Medicine\",\"volume\":\"15 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12470750/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Personalized Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm15090437\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Personalized Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm15090437","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

阿尔茨海默病(AD)是痴呆症最常见的病因,病理上由细胞外淀粉样蛋白-β (Aβ)斑块和细胞内tau神经原纤维缠结定义。最近,美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)批准了抗淀粉样蛋白单克隆抗体(mab) aducanumab、lecanemab和donanemab,这是首批治疗早期AD的疾病改善疗法。由于适度的疗效和安全性问题,特别是淀粉样蛋白相关成像异常(ARIAs),这些疗法既引起了乐观,也引起了争议。本文综述了目前关于抗β单抗在AD治疗中的有效性、安全性和生物标志物引导下使用的证据。方法:我们检索PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, b谷歌Scholar到2025年7月31日关于AD抗淀粉样蛋白单克隆抗体的研究。来源包括同行评审的文章和监管报告。提取的数据包括研究设计、人群、淀粉样蛋白确认、给药、结果、生物标志物、ARIA发生率和管理。结果:抗淀粉样蛋白单克隆抗体一贯表现出强大的淀粉样蛋白清除和适度减缓早期症状性AD的临床衰退。不同药物在疗效信号、安全性和监管结果方面存在差异。Lecanemab和donanemab表现出更一致的认知益处,而aducanumab的结果好坏参半,导致其退出。ARIAs是最常见的不良事件,在APOE ε4携带者中更常见,通常在治疗早期发生。生物标志物分析也揭示了有利的下游效应,包括磷酸化tau蛋白和星形胶质细胞损伤标志物的减少,支持疾病生物学的参与。结论:抗淀粉样蛋白单克隆抗体为AD修饰提供了概念证明,在疾病早期和tau负荷适中时获益最大。最佳使用需要淀粉样蛋白的生物标志物确认,仔细的tau分期和遗传风险评估。尽管存在局限性,但这些治疗方法代表了向精确神经学迈出的关键一步,并可能作为针对tau,神经炎症和血管病理的多模式策略的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Anti-Amyloid Monoclonal Antibodies for Alzheimer's Disease: Evidence, ARIA Risk, and Precision Patient Selection.

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common cause of dementia, pathologically defined by extracellular amyloid-β (Aβ) plaques and intracellular tau neurofibrillary tangles. Recent U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approvals of anti-amyloid monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) aducanumab, lecanemab, and donanemab represent the first disease-modifying therapies for early AD. These therapies have generated both optimism and controversy due to modest efficacy and safety concerns, particularly amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIAs). This review synthesizes current evidence on the efficacy, safety, and biomarker-guided use of anti-Aβ mAbs in AD. Methods: We searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar to 31 July 2025 for studies on anti-amyloid mAbs in AD. Sources included peer-reviewed articles and regulatory reports. The extracted data covered study design, population, amyloid confirmation, dosing, outcomes, biomarkers, ARIA incidence, and management. Results: Anti-amyloid mAbs consistently demonstrated robust amyloid clearance and modest slowing of clinical decline in early symptomatic AD. Differences emerged across agents in efficacy signals, safety profiles, and regulatory outcomes. Lecanemab and donanemab showed more consistent cognitive benefits, while aducanumab yielded mixed findings, leading to its withdrawal. ARIAs were the most frequent adverse events, occurring more often in APOE ε4 carriers and typically during early treatment. Biomarker analyses also revealed favorable downstream effects, including reductions in phosphorylated tau and markers of astroglial injury, supporting engagement of disease biology. Conclusions: Anti-amyloid mAbs provide proof of concept for AD modification, with the greatest benefit in early disease stages and moderate tau burden. Optimal use requires biomarker confirmation of the amyloid, careful tau staging, and genetic risk assessment. While limitations remain, these therapies represent a pivotal step toward precision neurology and may serve as a foundation for multimodal strategies targeting tau, neuroinflammation, and vascular pathology.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Personalized Medicine
Journal of Personalized Medicine Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1878
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Personalized Medicine (JPM; ISSN 2075-4426) is an international, open access journal aimed at bringing all aspects of personalized medicine to one platform. JPM publishes cutting edge, innovative preclinical and translational scientific research and technologies related to personalized medicine (e.g., pharmacogenomics/proteomics, systems biology). JPM recognizes that personalized medicine—the assessment of genetic, environmental and host factors that cause variability of individuals—is a challenging, transdisciplinary topic that requires discussions from a range of experts. For a comprehensive perspective of personalized medicine, JPM aims to integrate expertise from the molecular and translational sciences, therapeutics and diagnostics, as well as discussions of regulatory, social, ethical and policy aspects. We provide a forum to bring together academic and clinical researchers, biotechnology, diagnostic and pharmaceutical companies, health professionals, regulatory and ethical experts, and government and regulatory authorities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信