Claudia C Schmidt, Michella M Bardakan, Elena Jaeger, Nils Richter, Gérard N Bischof, Kathrin Giehl, Oezguer A Onur, Frank Jessen, Gereon R Fink, Alexander Drzezga, Peter H Weiss
{"title":"在生物标志物证实的阿尔茨海默病病理患者中,失用缺陷预测一般认知障碍。","authors":"Claudia C Schmidt, Michella M Bardakan, Elena Jaeger, Nils Richter, Gérard N Bischof, Kathrin Giehl, Oezguer A Onur, Frank Jessen, Gereon R Fink, Alexander Drzezga, Peter H Weiss","doi":"10.1007/s00415-025-13401-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Apraxia represents a core feature of Alzheimer's disease (AD), a neurodegenerative disorder characterised by the accumulation of β-amyloid plaques and tau deposition. However, systematic descriptions of apraxic deficits in AD patients remain scarce. Here, we comprehensively investigate apraxia profiles and their link with cognitive impairment in patients with biomarker-verified Alzheimer's pathology. We characterised the frequency and patterns of apraxic deficits in patients with biomarker-verified Alzheimer's pathology using a battery of standardised apraxia tests. Demographic variables and apraxia scores were related to patients' general cognitive impairment using hierarchical regression analysis. Apraxic deficits were found in 67% of patients with biomarker-verified Alzheimer's pathology (n = 63). Patients with Alzheimer's pathology were more impaired in imitating finger gestures (than hand gestures: 89.2% vs. 80.0%, p < 0.001) and imitating complex hand movements (than single hand movements: 97.4% vs. 78.5%, p < 0.001), even when controlling for general cognitive impairment. Apraxia assessments explained about 60% of the variance in dementia severity, with performance in the KAS subtest of pantomiming object use (beta coefficient: 0.47, p = 0.001) and the DATE subtest for limb apraxia (beta coefficient: 0.37, p = 0.005) constituting significant predictors of general cognitive impairment. These findings emphasise the relevance of apraxia in patients with biomarker-verified Alzheimer's pathology, revealing that praxis deficits predict general cognitive impairment in AD. Further research is warranted into the role of apraxia as a potential early diagnostic criterion in AD.</p>","PeriodicalId":16558,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurology","volume":"272 10","pages":"654"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12464036/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Apraxic deficits predict general cognitive impairment in patients with biomarker-verified Alzheimer's pathology.\",\"authors\":\"Claudia C Schmidt, Michella M Bardakan, Elena Jaeger, Nils Richter, Gérard N Bischof, Kathrin Giehl, Oezguer A Onur, Frank Jessen, Gereon R Fink, Alexander Drzezga, Peter H Weiss\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00415-025-13401-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Apraxia represents a core feature of Alzheimer's disease (AD), a neurodegenerative disorder characterised by the accumulation of β-amyloid plaques and tau deposition. However, systematic descriptions of apraxic deficits in AD patients remain scarce. Here, we comprehensively investigate apraxia profiles and their link with cognitive impairment in patients with biomarker-verified Alzheimer's pathology. We characterised the frequency and patterns of apraxic deficits in patients with biomarker-verified Alzheimer's pathology using a battery of standardised apraxia tests. Demographic variables and apraxia scores were related to patients' general cognitive impairment using hierarchical regression analysis. Apraxic deficits were found in 67% of patients with biomarker-verified Alzheimer's pathology (n = 63). Patients with Alzheimer's pathology were more impaired in imitating finger gestures (than hand gestures: 89.2% vs. 80.0%, p < 0.001) and imitating complex hand movements (than single hand movements: 97.4% vs. 78.5%, p < 0.001), even when controlling for general cognitive impairment. Apraxia assessments explained about 60% of the variance in dementia severity, with performance in the KAS subtest of pantomiming object use (beta coefficient: 0.47, p = 0.001) and the DATE subtest for limb apraxia (beta coefficient: 0.37, p = 0.005) constituting significant predictors of general cognitive impairment. These findings emphasise the relevance of apraxia in patients with biomarker-verified Alzheimer's pathology, revealing that praxis deficits predict general cognitive impairment in AD. Further research is warranted into the role of apraxia as a potential early diagnostic criterion in AD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16558,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neurology\",\"volume\":\"272 10\",\"pages\":\"654\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12464036/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-025-13401-9\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-025-13401-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
失用症是阿尔茨海默病(AD)的核心特征,阿尔茨海默病是一种神经退行性疾病,其特征是β-淀粉样斑块和tau沉积的积累。然而,对阿尔茨海默病患者的失用能力的系统描述仍然很少。在这里,我们全面研究了失用症特征及其与生物标志物证实的阿尔茨海默病病理患者认知障碍的联系。我们使用一系列标准化的失用测试,对生物标志物证实的阿尔茨海默病病理患者的失用缺陷的频率和模式进行了表征。分层回归分析人口统计学变量和失用症评分与患者一般认知功能障碍相关。67%经生物标志物证实的阿尔茨海默病患者(n = 63)存在失用症。阿尔茨海默病患者在模仿手指手势(89.2% vs. 80.0%, p
Apraxic deficits predict general cognitive impairment in patients with biomarker-verified Alzheimer's pathology.
Apraxia represents a core feature of Alzheimer's disease (AD), a neurodegenerative disorder characterised by the accumulation of β-amyloid plaques and tau deposition. However, systematic descriptions of apraxic deficits in AD patients remain scarce. Here, we comprehensively investigate apraxia profiles and their link with cognitive impairment in patients with biomarker-verified Alzheimer's pathology. We characterised the frequency and patterns of apraxic deficits in patients with biomarker-verified Alzheimer's pathology using a battery of standardised apraxia tests. Demographic variables and apraxia scores were related to patients' general cognitive impairment using hierarchical regression analysis. Apraxic deficits were found in 67% of patients with biomarker-verified Alzheimer's pathology (n = 63). Patients with Alzheimer's pathology were more impaired in imitating finger gestures (than hand gestures: 89.2% vs. 80.0%, p < 0.001) and imitating complex hand movements (than single hand movements: 97.4% vs. 78.5%, p < 0.001), even when controlling for general cognitive impairment. Apraxia assessments explained about 60% of the variance in dementia severity, with performance in the KAS subtest of pantomiming object use (beta coefficient: 0.47, p = 0.001) and the DATE subtest for limb apraxia (beta coefficient: 0.37, p = 0.005) constituting significant predictors of general cognitive impairment. These findings emphasise the relevance of apraxia in patients with biomarker-verified Alzheimer's pathology, revealing that praxis deficits predict general cognitive impairment in AD. Further research is warranted into the role of apraxia as a potential early diagnostic criterion in AD.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Neurology is an international peer-reviewed journal which provides a source for publishing original communications and reviews on clinical neurology covering the whole field.
In addition, Letters to the Editors serve as a forum for clinical cases and the exchange of ideas which highlight important new findings. A section on Neurological progress serves to summarise the major findings in certain fields of neurology. Commentaries on new developments in clinical neuroscience, which may be commissioned or submitted, are published as editorials.
Every neurologist interested in the current diagnosis and treatment of neurological disorders needs access to the information contained in this valuable journal.