Emmi K H Värri, Johanna Tietäväinen, Lauri J Suojanen, Manoj Kumar Choudhary, Jukka Mustonen, Jenni K Koskela, Ilkka H Pörsti
{"title":"高血压家族史患者全身血管阻力增高","authors":"Emmi K H Värri, Johanna Tietäväinen, Lauri J Suojanen, Manoj Kumar Choudhary, Jukka Mustonen, Jenni K Koskela, Ilkka H Pörsti","doi":"10.1097/HJH.0000000000004133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare blood pressure (BP) and cardiovascular function between individuals with and without a family history of hypertension in a first-degree relative.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The haemodynamics of participants with (n = 437) and without (n = 274) a family history of hypertension were recorded using continuous tonometric pulse wave analysis and whole-body impedance cardiography during passive head-up tilt.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The group with a family history of hypertension had a higher percentage of antihypertensive medication users (15.6 vs. 8%, P = 0.003) and higher office BP (143/91 vs. 140/87 mmHg, P < 0.05) than the group without hypertensive first-degree relatives. The proportion of men (51.9 vs. 55.1%) and the mean age (48.2 vs. 48.1 years) were similar in both groups. During head-up tilt, participants with a family history of hypertension consistently had 5/4 mmHg (systolic/diastolic) higher radial and aortic BP (P < 0.001 for all comparisons), a shorter aortic reflection time (-2.4 ms, P = 0.017), and a higher systemic vascular resistance (SVR) index (180 dyn s/cm5 m2, P < 0.001) than participants without hypertensive first-degree relatives. Central forward wave amplitude, pulse pressure, augmentation pressure, augmentation index, heart rate, cardiac output, and pulse wave velocity did not differ between the study groups. All haemodynamic variables changed significantly in response to head-up tilt with no differences between the two study groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Participants with a family history of hypertension were characterized by elevated central and peripheral BP probably due to higher SVR, whereas the stiffness of large arteries was not higher. These findings highlight the role of SVR in the pathogenesis of primary hypertension.</p>","PeriodicalId":16043,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hypertension","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Higher systemic vascular resistance in individuals with a family history of hypertension.\",\"authors\":\"Emmi K H Värri, Johanna Tietäväinen, Lauri J Suojanen, Manoj Kumar Choudhary, Jukka Mustonen, Jenni K Koskela, Ilkka H Pörsti\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/HJH.0000000000004133\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare blood pressure (BP) and cardiovascular function between individuals with and without a family history of hypertension in a first-degree relative.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The haemodynamics of participants with (n = 437) and without (n = 274) a family history of hypertension were recorded using continuous tonometric pulse wave analysis and whole-body impedance cardiography during passive head-up tilt.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The group with a family history of hypertension had a higher percentage of antihypertensive medication users (15.6 vs. 8%, P = 0.003) and higher office BP (143/91 vs. 140/87 mmHg, P < 0.05) than the group without hypertensive first-degree relatives. The proportion of men (51.9 vs. 55.1%) and the mean age (48.2 vs. 48.1 years) were similar in both groups. During head-up tilt, participants with a family history of hypertension consistently had 5/4 mmHg (systolic/diastolic) higher radial and aortic BP (P < 0.001 for all comparisons), a shorter aortic reflection time (-2.4 ms, P = 0.017), and a higher systemic vascular resistance (SVR) index (180 dyn s/cm5 m2, P < 0.001) than participants without hypertensive first-degree relatives. Central forward wave amplitude, pulse pressure, augmentation pressure, augmentation index, heart rate, cardiac output, and pulse wave velocity did not differ between the study groups. All haemodynamic variables changed significantly in response to head-up tilt with no differences between the two study groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Participants with a family history of hypertension were characterized by elevated central and peripheral BP probably due to higher SVR, whereas the stiffness of large arteries was not higher. These findings highlight the role of SVR in the pathogenesis of primary hypertension.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16043,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hypertension\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hypertension\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0000000000004133\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0000000000004133","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:比较一级亲属中有和无高血压家族史个体的血压和心血管功能。方法:采用连续血压计脉搏波分析和全身阻抗心动图记录有(n = 437)和无(n = 274)高血压家族史的参与者在被动俯仰时的血流动力学。结果:高血压家族史组降压药使用比例较高(15.6 vs. 8%, P = 0.003),血压升高(143/91 vs. 140/87 mmHg, P)。结论:高血压家族史组中枢性和外周性血压升高可能是由于SVR较高,而大动脉僵硬度不高。这些发现强调了SVR在原发性高血压发病机制中的作用。
Higher systemic vascular resistance in individuals with a family history of hypertension.
Objective: To compare blood pressure (BP) and cardiovascular function between individuals with and without a family history of hypertension in a first-degree relative.
Methods: The haemodynamics of participants with (n = 437) and without (n = 274) a family history of hypertension were recorded using continuous tonometric pulse wave analysis and whole-body impedance cardiography during passive head-up tilt.
Results: The group with a family history of hypertension had a higher percentage of antihypertensive medication users (15.6 vs. 8%, P = 0.003) and higher office BP (143/91 vs. 140/87 mmHg, P < 0.05) than the group without hypertensive first-degree relatives. The proportion of men (51.9 vs. 55.1%) and the mean age (48.2 vs. 48.1 years) were similar in both groups. During head-up tilt, participants with a family history of hypertension consistently had 5/4 mmHg (systolic/diastolic) higher radial and aortic BP (P < 0.001 for all comparisons), a shorter aortic reflection time (-2.4 ms, P = 0.017), and a higher systemic vascular resistance (SVR) index (180 dyn s/cm5 m2, P < 0.001) than participants without hypertensive first-degree relatives. Central forward wave amplitude, pulse pressure, augmentation pressure, augmentation index, heart rate, cardiac output, and pulse wave velocity did not differ between the study groups. All haemodynamic variables changed significantly in response to head-up tilt with no differences between the two study groups.
Conclusion: Participants with a family history of hypertension were characterized by elevated central and peripheral BP probably due to higher SVR, whereas the stiffness of large arteries was not higher. These findings highlight the role of SVR in the pathogenesis of primary hypertension.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Hypertension publishes papers reporting original clinical and experimental research which are of a high standard and which contribute to the advancement of knowledge in the field of hypertension. The Journal publishes full papers, reviews or editorials (normally by invitation), and correspondence.