Young-Tak Son, Keunbada Son, Ji-Min Lee, Kyu-Bok Lee
{"title":"龈下终点线的口内扫描会影响临时冠的准确性吗?","authors":"Young-Tak Son, Keunbada Son, Ji-Min Lee, Kyu-Bok Lee","doi":"10.3390/jfb16090309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This in vitro study evaluated the internal surface trueness and the marginal and internal fit of interim crowns fabricated from intraoral scanner (IOS; i500, MEDIT, Seoul, Republic of Korea) data, considering variations in subgingival finish line depth and the use of gingival retraction. A right maxillary first molar was prepared using a milled ceramic abutment, with subgingival finish line depths set at 0, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, and 1.00 mm from the gingival crest. All specimens were scanned with an IOS, both with and without gingival retraction. Interim crowns were designed from the scan data and produced via three-dimensional (3D) printing. Internal surface trueness was measured using 3D inspection software (Geomagic Control X version 2022.0.0; 3D Systems, Rock Hill, SC, USA), while marginal and internal fit were assessed with the silicone replica technique. Data were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test and Kruskal-Wallis H test (α = 0.05). In the absence of gingival retraction, internal surface trueness and crown fit decreased significantly with increasing finish line depth (<i>p</i> < 0.05). At a 1.00 mm depth without retraction, internal trueness reached 100.1 ± 44.5 µm and marginal fit was 189.1 ± 42.2 µm, both exceeding clinical thresholds. With gingival retraction, trueness and fit remained stable across all depths (<i>p</i> > 0.05). At 1.0 mm depth, trueness was 82.0 ± 61.8 µm and marginal fit was 95.2 ± 22.9 µm, both within clinically acceptable limits. A significant correlation was observed between marginal trueness and overall fit when retraction was not performed (<i>p</i> < 0.05). These results demonstrate that increasing subgingival finish line depth can significantly reduce intraoral scanning accuracy, resulting in suboptimal interim crown adaptation when gingival retraction is omitted. To achieve clinically acceptable internal trueness and marginal fit, gingival displacement with a retraction cord is recommended during intraoral scanning for subgingival prosthesis fabrication.</p>","PeriodicalId":15767,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Functional Biomaterials","volume":"16 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12470884/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does Intraoral Scanning at the Subgingival Finish Line Affect the Accuracy of Interim Crowns?\",\"authors\":\"Young-Tak Son, Keunbada Son, Ji-Min Lee, Kyu-Bok Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/jfb16090309\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This in vitro study evaluated the internal surface trueness and the marginal and internal fit of interim crowns fabricated from intraoral scanner (IOS; i500, MEDIT, Seoul, Republic of Korea) data, considering variations in subgingival finish line depth and the use of gingival retraction. A right maxillary first molar was prepared using a milled ceramic abutment, with subgingival finish line depths set at 0, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, and 1.00 mm from the gingival crest. All specimens were scanned with an IOS, both with and without gingival retraction. Interim crowns were designed from the scan data and produced via three-dimensional (3D) printing. Internal surface trueness was measured using 3D inspection software (Geomagic Control X version 2022.0.0; 3D Systems, Rock Hill, SC, USA), while marginal and internal fit were assessed with the silicone replica technique. Data were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test and Kruskal-Wallis H test (α = 0.05). In the absence of gingival retraction, internal surface trueness and crown fit decreased significantly with increasing finish line depth (<i>p</i> < 0.05). At a 1.00 mm depth without retraction, internal trueness reached 100.1 ± 44.5 µm and marginal fit was 189.1 ± 42.2 µm, both exceeding clinical thresholds. With gingival retraction, trueness and fit remained stable across all depths (<i>p</i> > 0.05). At 1.0 mm depth, trueness was 82.0 ± 61.8 µm and marginal fit was 95.2 ± 22.9 µm, both within clinically acceptable limits. A significant correlation was observed between marginal trueness and overall fit when retraction was not performed (<i>p</i> < 0.05). These results demonstrate that increasing subgingival finish line depth can significantly reduce intraoral scanning accuracy, resulting in suboptimal interim crown adaptation when gingival retraction is omitted. To achieve clinically acceptable internal trueness and marginal fit, gingival displacement with a retraction cord is recommended during intraoral scanning for subgingival prosthesis fabrication.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15767,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Functional Biomaterials\",\"volume\":\"16 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12470884/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Functional Biomaterials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb16090309\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Functional Biomaterials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb16090309","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本体外研究评估了由口腔内扫描仪(IOS; i500, MEDIT, Seoul, Republic of Korea)数据制作的临时冠的内表面真实度、边缘和内部配合度,考虑了龈下终点线深度的变化和牙龈回缩的使用。右上颌第一磨牙采用研磨陶瓷基牙,龈下终点线深度分别为离龈嵴0、0.25、0.50、0.75和1.00 mm。所有标本均用IOS扫描,包括牙龈内收和不内收。根据扫描数据设计临时冠,并通过三维打印制作。使用3D检测软件(Geomagic Control X version 2022.0.0; 3D Systems, Rock Hill, SC, USA)测量内部表面的真实度,同时使用硅胶复制技术评估边缘和内部配合。数据分析采用Mann-Whitney U检验和Kruskal-Wallis H检验(α = 0.05)。在无龈内收的情况下,随着终点线深度的增加,内表面真实度和冠配合度显著降低(p < 0.05)。在1.00 mm深度无回缩时,内部真实度达到100.1±44.5µm,边缘拟合为189.1±42.2µm,均超过临床阈值。牙龈内收后,各深度牙体的真实度和贴合度均保持稳定(p < 0.05)。在1.0 mm深度,真实度为82.0±61.8µm,边际拟合为95.2±22.9µm,均在临床可接受范围内。当不进行内收时,观察到边缘真实度和整体拟合之间存在显著相关(p < 0.05)。这些结果表明,增加龈下终点线深度会显著降低口腔内扫描精度,导致省略牙龈内收时中期冠适应不理想。为了达到临床可接受的内部真实度和边缘贴合,建议在口腔内扫描牙龈下假体制作时使用牵回索进行牙龈移位。
Does Intraoral Scanning at the Subgingival Finish Line Affect the Accuracy of Interim Crowns?
This in vitro study evaluated the internal surface trueness and the marginal and internal fit of interim crowns fabricated from intraoral scanner (IOS; i500, MEDIT, Seoul, Republic of Korea) data, considering variations in subgingival finish line depth and the use of gingival retraction. A right maxillary first molar was prepared using a milled ceramic abutment, with subgingival finish line depths set at 0, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, and 1.00 mm from the gingival crest. All specimens were scanned with an IOS, both with and without gingival retraction. Interim crowns were designed from the scan data and produced via three-dimensional (3D) printing. Internal surface trueness was measured using 3D inspection software (Geomagic Control X version 2022.0.0; 3D Systems, Rock Hill, SC, USA), while marginal and internal fit were assessed with the silicone replica technique. Data were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test and Kruskal-Wallis H test (α = 0.05). In the absence of gingival retraction, internal surface trueness and crown fit decreased significantly with increasing finish line depth (p < 0.05). At a 1.00 mm depth without retraction, internal trueness reached 100.1 ± 44.5 µm and marginal fit was 189.1 ± 42.2 µm, both exceeding clinical thresholds. With gingival retraction, trueness and fit remained stable across all depths (p > 0.05). At 1.0 mm depth, trueness was 82.0 ± 61.8 µm and marginal fit was 95.2 ± 22.9 µm, both within clinically acceptable limits. A significant correlation was observed between marginal trueness and overall fit when retraction was not performed (p < 0.05). These results demonstrate that increasing subgingival finish line depth can significantly reduce intraoral scanning accuracy, resulting in suboptimal interim crown adaptation when gingival retraction is omitted. To achieve clinically acceptable internal trueness and marginal fit, gingival displacement with a retraction cord is recommended during intraoral scanning for subgingival prosthesis fabrication.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Functional Biomaterials (JFB, ISSN 2079-4983) is an international and interdisciplinary scientific journal that publishes regular research papers (articles), reviews and short communications about applications of materials for biomedical use. JFB covers subjects from chemistry, pharmacy, biology, physics over to engineering. The journal focuses on the preparation, performance and use of functional biomaterials in biomedical devices and their behaviour in physiological environments. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their results in as much detail as possible. Therefore, there is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Several topical special issues will be published. Scope: adhesion, adsorption, biocompatibility, biohybrid materials, bio-inert materials, biomaterials, biomedical devices, biomimetic materials, bone repair, cardiovascular devices, ceramics, composite materials, dental implants, dental materials, drug delivery systems, functional biopolymers, glasses, hyper branched polymers, molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs), nanomedicine, nanoparticles, nanotechnology, natural materials, self-assembly smart materials, stimuli responsive materials, surface modification, tissue devices, tissue engineering, tissue-derived materials, urological devices.