应用通用右心室模型优化流出道室性心律失常消融。

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Krystian Szkoła, Łukasz Zarębski, Paweł Turek, Marian Futyma, Łukasz Wiśniowski, Piotr Futyma
{"title":"应用通用右心室模型优化流出道室性心律失常消融。","authors":"Krystian Szkoła, Łukasz Zarębski, Paweł Turek, Marian Futyma, Łukasz Wiśniowski, Piotr Futyma","doi":"10.3390/jcdd12090323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> The radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) of ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) originating from the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) is a well-established therapy. Traditionally, RFCA is guided using electroanatomical 3D mapping systems involving manual catheter navigation within cardiac chambers. While effective, this approach may be time-consuming, and it carries a potential risk of cardiac wall perforation. Although the risk is low, it cannot be underestimated. Therefore, alternative mapping methods are sought to reduce procedural times and improve the overall efficiency of RVOT-VAs ablation. <b>Aim:</b> To evaluate the safety, feasibility, and efficacy of a universal RVOT 3D model implementation for the ablation of idiopathic RVOT-VAs. <b>Methods:</b> Consecutive patients undergoing VA ablation supported with a universal RVOT 3D model (3D-MODEL group) were included in the study. The RVOT universal model in this group was created by processing DICOM images for the improved segmentation of anatomical structures, followed by production using 3D printing technology. Patients who underwent classic endocardial electroanatomical mapping served as controls (EAM group). <b>Results:</b> A total of 228 patients were included in the study (143 women, age 50 ± 17 years): 149 in the 3D-MODEL group and 79 in the EAM group. The acute complete elimination of clinical VAs was achieved for 133 (89%) of patients in the 3D-MODEL group vs. 65 (82%) in the EAM group (<i>p</i> = 0.14). The procedural time was significantly shorter in the 3D-MODEL group compared to the EAM group (38 ± 14 min vs. 80 ± 39 min, <i>p</i> < 0.001). A significant difference was also observed in the radiofrequency time between the 3D-MODEL and EAM groups (251 ± 176 s vs. 503 ± 425 s, <i>p</i> < 0.001). No significant difference in fluoroscopy time was found between the groups (284 ± 167 s vs. 260 ± 327 s, <i>p</i> = 0.49). Two cases of cardiac tamponade occurred, both in patients from the EAM group. During follow-up, lasting 14 ± 10 months, 87% of patients in the 3D-MODEL group and 75% in the EAM group remained arrhythmia-free (<i>p</i> = 0.45). <b>Conclusions:</b> The use of universal RVOT 3D modeling is a feasible, safe, and effective alternative to classic electroanatomical mapping in the ablation of idiopathic RVOT-VAs.</p>","PeriodicalId":15197,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease","volume":"12 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12470283/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimization of Outflow-Tract Ventricular Arrhythmia Ablation Using a Universal Right Ventricle Model.\",\"authors\":\"Krystian Szkoła, Łukasz Zarębski, Paweł Turek, Marian Futyma, Łukasz Wiśniowski, Piotr Futyma\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/jcdd12090323\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> The radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) of ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) originating from the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) is a well-established therapy. Traditionally, RFCA is guided using electroanatomical 3D mapping systems involving manual catheter navigation within cardiac chambers. While effective, this approach may be time-consuming, and it carries a potential risk of cardiac wall perforation. Although the risk is low, it cannot be underestimated. Therefore, alternative mapping methods are sought to reduce procedural times and improve the overall efficiency of RVOT-VAs ablation. <b>Aim:</b> To evaluate the safety, feasibility, and efficacy of a universal RVOT 3D model implementation for the ablation of idiopathic RVOT-VAs. <b>Methods:</b> Consecutive patients undergoing VA ablation supported with a universal RVOT 3D model (3D-MODEL group) were included in the study. The RVOT universal model in this group was created by processing DICOM images for the improved segmentation of anatomical structures, followed by production using 3D printing technology. Patients who underwent classic endocardial electroanatomical mapping served as controls (EAM group). <b>Results:</b> A total of 228 patients were included in the study (143 women, age 50 ± 17 years): 149 in the 3D-MODEL group and 79 in the EAM group. The acute complete elimination of clinical VAs was achieved for 133 (89%) of patients in the 3D-MODEL group vs. 65 (82%) in the EAM group (<i>p</i> = 0.14). The procedural time was significantly shorter in the 3D-MODEL group compared to the EAM group (38 ± 14 min vs. 80 ± 39 min, <i>p</i> < 0.001). A significant difference was also observed in the radiofrequency time between the 3D-MODEL and EAM groups (251 ± 176 s vs. 503 ± 425 s, <i>p</i> < 0.001). No significant difference in fluoroscopy time was found between the groups (284 ± 167 s vs. 260 ± 327 s, <i>p</i> = 0.49). Two cases of cardiac tamponade occurred, both in patients from the EAM group. During follow-up, lasting 14 ± 10 months, 87% of patients in the 3D-MODEL group and 75% in the EAM group remained arrhythmia-free (<i>p</i> = 0.45). <b>Conclusions:</b> The use of universal RVOT 3D modeling is a feasible, safe, and effective alternative to classic electroanatomical mapping in the ablation of idiopathic RVOT-VAs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15197,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease\",\"volume\":\"12 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12470283/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd12090323\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd12090323","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导读:射频导管消融(RFCA)治疗源自右心室流出道(RVOT)的室性心律失常(VAs)是一种成熟的治疗方法。传统上,RFCA是使用电解剖3D测绘系统引导的,包括在心脏腔内手动导尿管导航。虽然有效,但这种方法可能很耗时,并且有心壁穿孔的潜在风险。虽然风险很低,但也不能低估。因此,寻找替代的测绘方法来减少手术时间并提高RVOT-VAs消融的整体效率。目的:评估通用RVOT 3D模型用于特发性RVOT- vas消融的安全性、可行性和有效性。方法:采用通用RVOT三维模型(3D- model组)连续行心室消融术患者。该组RVOT通用模型是通过处理DICOM图像来改进解剖结构的分割,然后使用3D打印技术进行生产。接受经典心内膜电解剖测图的患者作为对照组(EAM组)。结果:共纳入228例患者(143例女性,年龄50±17岁):3D-MODEL组149例,EAM组79例。3D-MODEL组133例(89%)患者实现临床VAs的急性完全消除,EAM组65例(82%)患者实现急性完全消除(p = 0.14)。3D-MODEL组的手术时间明显短于EAM组(38±14 min vs 80±39 min, p < 0.001)。3D-MODEL组和EAM组的射频时间也有显著差异(251±176 s vs. 503±425 s, p < 0.001)。两组透视时间差异无统计学意义(284±167 s vs 260±327 s, p = 0.49)。发生2例心包填塞,均为EAM组患者。随访14±10个月,3D-MODEL组87%的患者和EAM组75%的患者无心律失常(p = 0.45)。结论:在特发性RVOT- vas消融中,通用RVOT 3D建模是一种可行、安全、有效的替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Optimization of Outflow-Tract Ventricular Arrhythmia Ablation Using a Universal Right Ventricle Model.

Introduction: The radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) of ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) originating from the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) is a well-established therapy. Traditionally, RFCA is guided using electroanatomical 3D mapping systems involving manual catheter navigation within cardiac chambers. While effective, this approach may be time-consuming, and it carries a potential risk of cardiac wall perforation. Although the risk is low, it cannot be underestimated. Therefore, alternative mapping methods are sought to reduce procedural times and improve the overall efficiency of RVOT-VAs ablation. Aim: To evaluate the safety, feasibility, and efficacy of a universal RVOT 3D model implementation for the ablation of idiopathic RVOT-VAs. Methods: Consecutive patients undergoing VA ablation supported with a universal RVOT 3D model (3D-MODEL group) were included in the study. The RVOT universal model in this group was created by processing DICOM images for the improved segmentation of anatomical structures, followed by production using 3D printing technology. Patients who underwent classic endocardial electroanatomical mapping served as controls (EAM group). Results: A total of 228 patients were included in the study (143 women, age 50 ± 17 years): 149 in the 3D-MODEL group and 79 in the EAM group. The acute complete elimination of clinical VAs was achieved for 133 (89%) of patients in the 3D-MODEL group vs. 65 (82%) in the EAM group (p = 0.14). The procedural time was significantly shorter in the 3D-MODEL group compared to the EAM group (38 ± 14 min vs. 80 ± 39 min, p < 0.001). A significant difference was also observed in the radiofrequency time between the 3D-MODEL and EAM groups (251 ± 176 s vs. 503 ± 425 s, p < 0.001). No significant difference in fluoroscopy time was found between the groups (284 ± 167 s vs. 260 ± 327 s, p = 0.49). Two cases of cardiac tamponade occurred, both in patients from the EAM group. During follow-up, lasting 14 ± 10 months, 87% of patients in the 3D-MODEL group and 75% in the EAM group remained arrhythmia-free (p = 0.45). Conclusions: The use of universal RVOT 3D modeling is a feasible, safe, and effective alternative to classic electroanatomical mapping in the ablation of idiopathic RVOT-VAs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease
Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
381
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信