MIDCAB与OPCAB术后围手术期临床特点及心脏康复效果比较研究

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Yao Wu, Bao Ren, Jing Li, Liqun Chi, Ping Li, Jiahui Wu
{"title":"MIDCAB与OPCAB术后围手术期临床特点及心脏康复效果比较研究","authors":"Yao Wu, Bao Ren, Jing Li, Liqun Chi, Ping Li, Jiahui Wu","doi":"10.3390/jcdd12090331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) surgery offers advantages over off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB), including reduced trauma and faster recovery. However, differences in perioperative cardiac rehabilitation (CR) outcomes between MIDCAB and OPCAB remain unclear. This study compared perioperative clinical characteristics, surgical features, and CR outcomes in patients undergoing MIDCAB versus OPCAB.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort analysis included 304 patients (31.2% MIDCAB, 68.8% OPCAB) who participated in a CR program, including the 6-min walk test (6MWT), from November 2023 to December 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MIDCAB patients had shorter surgery times, fewer grafted vessels, shorter ventilator-assisted time, less total intraoperative fluid, less bleeding, and shorter postoperative hospital stays (all <i>p</i> < 0.05). After cardiac rehabilitation, MIDCAB patients showed shorter time to 6MWT, longer six-minute walk distance (6MWD) (200 ± 125 vs. 178 ± 125 m), higher 6MWD relative to predicted values, and greater metabolic equivalents (all <i>p</i> < 0.05). The median LVEF of MIDCAB patients was the same as that of OPCAB patients (<i>p</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study demonstrates that MIDCAB patients exhibit superior exercise capacity following cardiac rehabilitation.</p>","PeriodicalId":15197,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease","volume":"12 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12470523/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Characteristics and Cardiac Rehabilitation Outcomes During the Perioperative Period After MIDCAB and OPCAB Surgery: A Comparative Study.\",\"authors\":\"Yao Wu, Bao Ren, Jing Li, Liqun Chi, Ping Li, Jiahui Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/jcdd12090331\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) surgery offers advantages over off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB), including reduced trauma and faster recovery. However, differences in perioperative cardiac rehabilitation (CR) outcomes between MIDCAB and OPCAB remain unclear. This study compared perioperative clinical characteristics, surgical features, and CR outcomes in patients undergoing MIDCAB versus OPCAB.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort analysis included 304 patients (31.2% MIDCAB, 68.8% OPCAB) who participated in a CR program, including the 6-min walk test (6MWT), from November 2023 to December 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MIDCAB patients had shorter surgery times, fewer grafted vessels, shorter ventilator-assisted time, less total intraoperative fluid, less bleeding, and shorter postoperative hospital stays (all <i>p</i> < 0.05). After cardiac rehabilitation, MIDCAB patients showed shorter time to 6MWT, longer six-minute walk distance (6MWD) (200 ± 125 vs. 178 ± 125 m), higher 6MWD relative to predicted values, and greater metabolic equivalents (all <i>p</i> < 0.05). The median LVEF of MIDCAB patients was the same as that of OPCAB patients (<i>p</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study demonstrates that MIDCAB patients exhibit superior exercise capacity following cardiac rehabilitation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15197,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease\",\"volume\":\"12 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12470523/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd12090331\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd12090331","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:微创直接冠状动脉搭桥术(MIDCAB)比非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术(OPCAB)具有更小的创伤和更快的恢复等优点。然而,MIDCAB和OPCAB之间围手术期心脏康复(CR)结果的差异尚不清楚。本研究比较了MIDCAB与OPCAB患者的围手术期临床特征、手术特征和CR结果。方法:本回顾性队列分析纳入了2023年11月至2024年12月参加CR项目(包括6分钟步行试验(6MWT))的304例患者(31.2% MIDCAB, 68.8% OPCAB)。结果:MIDCAB患者手术时间短、移植血管少、呼吸机辅助时间短、术中总液少、出血少、术后住院时间短(均p < 0.05)。心脏康复后,MIDCAB患者达到6MWT的时间更短,6分钟步行距离(6MWD)更长(200±125比178±125 m), 6MWD相对于预测值更高,代谢当量更高(均p < 0.05)。MIDCAB患者的中位LVEF与OPCAB患者相同(p < 0.05)。结论:我们的研究表明MIDCAB患者在心脏康复后表现出更好的运动能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical Characteristics and Cardiac Rehabilitation Outcomes During the Perioperative Period After MIDCAB and OPCAB Surgery: A Comparative Study.

Background: Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) surgery offers advantages over off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB), including reduced trauma and faster recovery. However, differences in perioperative cardiac rehabilitation (CR) outcomes between MIDCAB and OPCAB remain unclear. This study compared perioperative clinical characteristics, surgical features, and CR outcomes in patients undergoing MIDCAB versus OPCAB.

Methods: This retrospective cohort analysis included 304 patients (31.2% MIDCAB, 68.8% OPCAB) who participated in a CR program, including the 6-min walk test (6MWT), from November 2023 to December 2024.

Results: MIDCAB patients had shorter surgery times, fewer grafted vessels, shorter ventilator-assisted time, less total intraoperative fluid, less bleeding, and shorter postoperative hospital stays (all p < 0.05). After cardiac rehabilitation, MIDCAB patients showed shorter time to 6MWT, longer six-minute walk distance (6MWD) (200 ± 125 vs. 178 ± 125 m), higher 6MWD relative to predicted values, and greater metabolic equivalents (all p < 0.05). The median LVEF of MIDCAB patients was the same as that of OPCAB patients (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: Our study demonstrates that MIDCAB patients exhibit superior exercise capacity following cardiac rehabilitation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease
Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
381
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信