超声分析二胎后产妇盆底分娩方式的差异:一项单中心研究。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 ACOUSTICS
Jiali Shou, Kun Wang, Wanting Xu, Huihui Yang, Yu He
{"title":"超声分析二胎后产妇盆底分娩方式的差异:一项单中心研究。","authors":"Jiali Shou, Kun Wang, Wanting Xu, Huihui Yang, Yu He","doi":"10.1002/jcu.70088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to assess the impact of delivery mode combinations after the second birth on maternal pelvic floor differences using transperineal ultrasound.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 266 women were enrolled in this study. According to the different delivery modes of two births, women were categorized as repeat vaginal birth (RVB), vaginal birth after cesarean section (VBAC), cesarean section after vaginal birth (CAVB), and repeat cesarean section (RCS) groups. Univariate analysis was performed to compare levator hiatus area (LHA-V), bladder neck-symphyseal distance on Valsalva (BSD-V), bladder neck descent (BND), and the occurrence of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) among the four groups. Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with LHA-V.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>BSD-V in the RVB, VBAC and CAVB groups was lower and their BND was greater than the counterparts in the RCS group (p < 0.05). The VBAC group exhibited a significantly lower BSD-V and greater BND compared to the CAVB group. The prevalence of POP was the highest in the RVB group and the lowest in the RCS group. LHA-V was the only ultrasound parameter statistically different in all pairwise comparisons among the four groups. The multiple linear regression analysis results demonstrated a significant relationship between LHA-V and different delivery modes of two births, neonatal weight, BND, uterine and perineal body position on Valsalva.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For women with both modes, vaginal birth after cesarean section exhibited significantly lower BSD-V, greater BND and larger LHA-V, with a higher prevalence of POP compared to the reverse sequence. Meanwhile, LHA-V was identified as a sensitive ultrasound indicator for differentiating pelvic floor outcomes across delivery mode combinations.</p>","PeriodicalId":15386,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Ultrasound","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ultrasonic Analysis of Maternal Pelvic Floor Differences Among Delivery Mode Combinations After the Second Birth: A Single-Center Study.\",\"authors\":\"Jiali Shou, Kun Wang, Wanting Xu, Huihui Yang, Yu He\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jcu.70088\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to assess the impact of delivery mode combinations after the second birth on maternal pelvic floor differences using transperineal ultrasound.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 266 women were enrolled in this study. According to the different delivery modes of two births, women were categorized as repeat vaginal birth (RVB), vaginal birth after cesarean section (VBAC), cesarean section after vaginal birth (CAVB), and repeat cesarean section (RCS) groups. Univariate analysis was performed to compare levator hiatus area (LHA-V), bladder neck-symphyseal distance on Valsalva (BSD-V), bladder neck descent (BND), and the occurrence of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) among the four groups. Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with LHA-V.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>BSD-V in the RVB, VBAC and CAVB groups was lower and their BND was greater than the counterparts in the RCS group (p < 0.05). The VBAC group exhibited a significantly lower BSD-V and greater BND compared to the CAVB group. The prevalence of POP was the highest in the RVB group and the lowest in the RCS group. LHA-V was the only ultrasound parameter statistically different in all pairwise comparisons among the four groups. The multiple linear regression analysis results demonstrated a significant relationship between LHA-V and different delivery modes of two births, neonatal weight, BND, uterine and perineal body position on Valsalva.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For women with both modes, vaginal birth after cesarean section exhibited significantly lower BSD-V, greater BND and larger LHA-V, with a higher prevalence of POP compared to the reverse sequence. Meanwhile, LHA-V was identified as a sensitive ultrasound indicator for differentiating pelvic floor outcomes across delivery mode combinations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15386,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Ultrasound\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Ultrasound\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jcu.70088\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ACOUSTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Ultrasound","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jcu.70088","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在利用经会阴超声评估二胎后分娩方式组合对产妇盆底差异的影响。方法:共纳入266名女性。根据两次分娩方式的不同,将产妇分为阴道复产(RVB)组、剖宫产后阴道复产(VBAC)组、阴道复产后剖宫产(CAVB)组和剖宫产复产(RCS)组。采用单因素分析比较四组患者的提肛裂孔面积(LHA-V)、膀胱颈-颈联合距离(BSD-V)、膀胱颈下降(BND)和盆腔器官脱垂(POP)发生情况。采用多元线性回归分析确定与LHA-V相关的因素。结果:RVB组、VBAC组和CAVB组BSD-V均低于RCS组,BND均高于RCS组(p结论:两种分娩方式的女性剖宫产后阴道分娩的BSD-V均低于RCS组,BND均高于RCS组,LHA-V均高于RCS组,POP患病率高于RCS组。同时,LHA-V被确定为区分不同分娩方式组合盆底结局的敏感超声指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ultrasonic Analysis of Maternal Pelvic Floor Differences Among Delivery Mode Combinations After the Second Birth: A Single-Center Study.

Purpose: This study aimed to assess the impact of delivery mode combinations after the second birth on maternal pelvic floor differences using transperineal ultrasound.

Methods: A total of 266 women were enrolled in this study. According to the different delivery modes of two births, women were categorized as repeat vaginal birth (RVB), vaginal birth after cesarean section (VBAC), cesarean section after vaginal birth (CAVB), and repeat cesarean section (RCS) groups. Univariate analysis was performed to compare levator hiatus area (LHA-V), bladder neck-symphyseal distance on Valsalva (BSD-V), bladder neck descent (BND), and the occurrence of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) among the four groups. Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with LHA-V.

Results: BSD-V in the RVB, VBAC and CAVB groups was lower and their BND was greater than the counterparts in the RCS group (p < 0.05). The VBAC group exhibited a significantly lower BSD-V and greater BND compared to the CAVB group. The prevalence of POP was the highest in the RVB group and the lowest in the RCS group. LHA-V was the only ultrasound parameter statistically different in all pairwise comparisons among the four groups. The multiple linear regression analysis results demonstrated a significant relationship between LHA-V and different delivery modes of two births, neonatal weight, BND, uterine and perineal body position on Valsalva.

Conclusion: For women with both modes, vaginal birth after cesarean section exhibited significantly lower BSD-V, greater BND and larger LHA-V, with a higher prevalence of POP compared to the reverse sequence. Meanwhile, LHA-V was identified as a sensitive ultrasound indicator for differentiating pelvic floor outcomes across delivery mode combinations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
248
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Ultrasound (JCU) is an international journal dedicated to the worldwide dissemination of scientific information on diagnostic and therapeutic applications of medical sonography. The scope of the journal includes--but is not limited to--the following areas: sonography of the gastrointestinal tract, genitourinary tract, vascular system, nervous system, head and neck, chest, breast, musculoskeletal system, and other superficial structures; Doppler applications; obstetric and pediatric applications; and interventional sonography. Studies comparing sonography with other imaging modalities are encouraged, as are studies evaluating the economic impact of sonography. Also within the journal''s scope are innovations and improvements in instrumentation and examination techniques and the use of contrast agents. JCU publishes original research articles, case reports, pictorial essays, technical notes, and letters to the editor. The journal is also dedicated to being an educational resource for its readers, through the publication of review articles and various scientific contributions from members of the editorial board and other world-renowned experts in sonography.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信