三种用于废水中病毒靶点检测和定量的数字PCR平台的性能和特点。

IF 3.2 3区 生物学 Q2 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Melissa Pitton, Johannes C Rusch, Shotaro Torii, Lea Caduff, Charles Gan, Federica Cariti, Patrick Schmidhalter, Christoph Ort, Tamar Kohn, Timothy R Julian
{"title":"三种用于废水中病毒靶点检测和定量的数字PCR平台的性能和特点。","authors":"Melissa Pitton, Johannes C Rusch, Shotaro Torii, Lea Caduff, Charles Gan, Federica Cariti, Patrick Schmidhalter, Christoph Ort, Tamar Kohn, Timothy R Julian","doi":"10.1093/jambio/lxaf243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The wider implementation of wastewater-based surveillance (WBS) has increased the necessity for nucleic acid detection and quantification from complex samples. Here, we compared the performance and the characteristics of three digital polymerase chain reaction (dPCR) platforms.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>The dPCR platforms selected in this study included the QX200 AutoDG Droplet Digital PCR System from Bio-Rad, the QIAcuity One, 2plex Device from Qiagen, and the 3-color Naica System manufactured by Stilla Technologies. Platforms were compared and described based on their handling in the laboratory and performance quantifying two viral targets-SARS-CoV-2 and Norovirus GII-in wastewater samples. Our findings showed that no single platform consistently outperformed the others in terms of target quantification. Moreover, we observed similarities amongst the systems with respect to resilience to inhibition, but differences in laboratory handling including sample throughput and method of quantification.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study suggests that all three selected dPCR platforms are similarly suitable for WBS, as quantitative performance of the systems for viral RNA targets extracted from wastewater is comparable. Decisions on platform selection can be driven by researcher preference on handling, throughput, and other differentiating characteristics.</p>","PeriodicalId":15036,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Microbiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance and characteristics of three digital PCR platforms for detection and quantification of viral targets in wastewater.\",\"authors\":\"Melissa Pitton, Johannes C Rusch, Shotaro Torii, Lea Caduff, Charles Gan, Federica Cariti, Patrick Schmidhalter, Christoph Ort, Tamar Kohn, Timothy R Julian\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jambio/lxaf243\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The wider implementation of wastewater-based surveillance (WBS) has increased the necessity for nucleic acid detection and quantification from complex samples. Here, we compared the performance and the characteristics of three digital polymerase chain reaction (dPCR) platforms.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>The dPCR platforms selected in this study included the QX200 AutoDG Droplet Digital PCR System from Bio-Rad, the QIAcuity One, 2plex Device from Qiagen, and the 3-color Naica System manufactured by Stilla Technologies. Platforms were compared and described based on their handling in the laboratory and performance quantifying two viral targets-SARS-CoV-2 and Norovirus GII-in wastewater samples. Our findings showed that no single platform consistently outperformed the others in terms of target quantification. Moreover, we observed similarities amongst the systems with respect to resilience to inhibition, but differences in laboratory handling including sample throughput and method of quantification.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study suggests that all three selected dPCR platforms are similarly suitable for WBS, as quantitative performance of the systems for viral RNA targets extracted from wastewater is comparable. Decisions on platform selection can be driven by researcher preference on handling, throughput, and other differentiating characteristics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15036,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Microbiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Microbiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jambio/lxaf243\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jambio/lxaf243","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:废水基监测(WBS)的广泛实施增加了对复杂样品进行核酸检测和定量的必要性。在这里,我们比较了三种数字PCR (dPCR)平台的性能和特点。方法和结果:本研究选择的dPCR平台包括Bio-Rad公司的QX200 AutoDG液滴数字PCR系统、Qiagen公司的QIAcuity One、2plex Device和Stilla Technologies公司的三色Naica System。根据其在实验室中的处理和对废水样品中两种病毒靶标(SARS-CoV-2和诺如病毒GII)的量化性能,对平台进行了比较和描述。我们的研究结果表明,在目标量化方面,没有一个单一平台始终优于其他平台。此外,我们观察到这些系统在抗抑制能力方面的相似性,但在实验室处理(包括样品吞吐量和定量方法)方面存在差异。结论:本研究表明,所有三种选择的dPCR平台都同样适用于WBS,因为系统对从废水中提取的病毒RNA靶点的定量性能是相当的。平台选择的决定可以由研究人员对处理、吞吐量和其他差异化特征的偏好驱动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Performance and characteristics of three digital PCR platforms for detection and quantification of viral targets in wastewater.

Aims: The wider implementation of wastewater-based surveillance (WBS) has increased the necessity for nucleic acid detection and quantification from complex samples. Here, we compared the performance and the characteristics of three digital polymerase chain reaction (dPCR) platforms.

Methods and results: The dPCR platforms selected in this study included the QX200 AutoDG Droplet Digital PCR System from Bio-Rad, the QIAcuity One, 2plex Device from Qiagen, and the 3-color Naica System manufactured by Stilla Technologies. Platforms were compared and described based on their handling in the laboratory and performance quantifying two viral targets-SARS-CoV-2 and Norovirus GII-in wastewater samples. Our findings showed that no single platform consistently outperformed the others in terms of target quantification. Moreover, we observed similarities amongst the systems with respect to resilience to inhibition, but differences in laboratory handling including sample throughput and method of quantification.

Conclusions: This study suggests that all three selected dPCR platforms are similarly suitable for WBS, as quantitative performance of the systems for viral RNA targets extracted from wastewater is comparable. Decisions on platform selection can be driven by researcher preference on handling, throughput, and other differentiating characteristics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Applied Microbiology
Journal of Applied Microbiology 生物-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
2.50%
发文量
427
审稿时长
2.7 months
期刊介绍: Journal of & Letters in Applied Microbiology are two of the flagship research journals of the Society for Applied Microbiology (SfAM). For more than 75 years they have been publishing top quality research and reviews in the broad field of applied microbiology. The journals are provided to all SfAM members as well as having a global online readership totalling more than 500,000 downloads per year in more than 200 countries. Submitting authors can expect fast decision and publication times, averaging 33 days to first decision and 34 days from acceptance to online publication. There are no page charges.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信