基于计算机断层扫描得出的血流储备分数的虚拟支架术预测经皮冠状动脉介入术后功能结果:一项回顾性队列研究。

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Han Zhao, Yanlong Ren, Jiang Li, Mingduo Zhang, Lijun Zhang, Rongliang Chen, Jia Liu, Zhengzheng Yan, Xiantao Song
{"title":"基于计算机断层扫描得出的血流储备分数的虚拟支架术预测经皮冠状动脉介入术后功能结果:一项回顾性队列研究。","authors":"Han Zhao, Yanlong Ren, Jiang Li, Mingduo Zhang, Lijun Zhang, Rongliang Chen, Jia Liu, Zhengzheng Yan, Xiantao Song","doi":"10.3390/jcdd12090373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>With the advancement of fractional flow reserve (FFR) derived from computed tomography (FFR<sub>CT</sub>), virtual stenting technology has gradually developed. This study investigated the performance of virtual stenting based on FFR<sub>CT</sub> in predicting post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) FFR. Data from 75 patients (78 blood vessels) was collected retrospectively. We randomly allocated the participants to discovery (<i>n</i> = 26) and validation (<i>n</i> = 52) cohorts. The FFR<sub>CT</sub> was calculated using pre-PCI coronary computed tomography angiography images. Virtual stent implantation was simulated using blinded and non-blinded virtual stenting methods to obtain post-virtual stenting FFR<sub>CT</sub>. The median FFR<sub>CT</sub> before PCI and invasive FFR were 0.70 (0.60-0.77) and 0.69 (0.63-0.76), respectively. The median FFR<sub>CT</sub> were 0.91 (0.86-0.95) and 0.91 (0.87-0.94) in the blinded and non-blinded groups, respectively; the invasive post-PCI FFR was 0.90 (0.88-0.93). The difference between the FFR<sub>CT</sub> after using the blinded/non-blinded method and the invasive post-PCI FFR were 0.010 (95% limits of agreement: -0.064 to 0.084) and 0.009 (-0.050 to 0.068) in the discovery cohort and -0.005 (-0.075 to 0.064) and -0.0002 (-0.064 to 0.064) in the validation cohort, respectively. Virtual stenting technology based on FFR<sub>CT</sub> can effectively predict functional outcomes after PCI and could be a reliable tool for PCI procedural planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":15197,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease","volume":"12 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12470931/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Virtual Stenting Based on Fractional Flow Reserve Derived from Computed Tomography in Predicting Post-Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Functional Outcomes: A Retrospective Cohort Study.\",\"authors\":\"Han Zhao, Yanlong Ren, Jiang Li, Mingduo Zhang, Lijun Zhang, Rongliang Chen, Jia Liu, Zhengzheng Yan, Xiantao Song\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/jcdd12090373\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>With the advancement of fractional flow reserve (FFR) derived from computed tomography (FFR<sub>CT</sub>), virtual stenting technology has gradually developed. This study investigated the performance of virtual stenting based on FFR<sub>CT</sub> in predicting post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) FFR. Data from 75 patients (78 blood vessels) was collected retrospectively. We randomly allocated the participants to discovery (<i>n</i> = 26) and validation (<i>n</i> = 52) cohorts. The FFR<sub>CT</sub> was calculated using pre-PCI coronary computed tomography angiography images. Virtual stent implantation was simulated using blinded and non-blinded virtual stenting methods to obtain post-virtual stenting FFR<sub>CT</sub>. The median FFR<sub>CT</sub> before PCI and invasive FFR were 0.70 (0.60-0.77) and 0.69 (0.63-0.76), respectively. The median FFR<sub>CT</sub> were 0.91 (0.86-0.95) and 0.91 (0.87-0.94) in the blinded and non-blinded groups, respectively; the invasive post-PCI FFR was 0.90 (0.88-0.93). The difference between the FFR<sub>CT</sub> after using the blinded/non-blinded method and the invasive post-PCI FFR were 0.010 (95% limits of agreement: -0.064 to 0.084) and 0.009 (-0.050 to 0.068) in the discovery cohort and -0.005 (-0.075 to 0.064) and -0.0002 (-0.064 to 0.064) in the validation cohort, respectively. Virtual stenting technology based on FFR<sub>CT</sub> can effectively predict functional outcomes after PCI and could be a reliable tool for PCI procedural planning.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15197,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease\",\"volume\":\"12 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12470931/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd12090373\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd12090373","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着计算机断层扫描(FFRCT)衍生的血流储备分数(FFR)技术的进步,虚拟支架置入技术逐渐得到发展。本研究探讨了基于FFRCT的虚拟支架术预测经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后FFR的性能。回顾性收集75例患者(78条血管)的资料。我们将参与者随机分配到发现组(n = 26)和验证组(n = 52)。FFRCT使用pci前冠状动脉ct血管造影图像计算。采用盲法和非盲法虚拟支架植入模拟虚拟支架植入,获得虚拟支架植入后的FFRCT。PCI前FFRCT中位数为0.70(0.60-0.77),有创FFR中位数为0.69(0.63-0.76)。盲法组和非盲法组的FFRCT中位数分别为0.91(0.86-0.95)和0.91 (0.87-0.94);有创pci后FFR为0.90(0.88-0.93)。采用盲法/非盲法的FFRCT与pci后有创FFR的差异在发现队列中分别为0.010(95%一致限:-0.064 ~ 0.084)和0.009(-0.050 ~ 0.068),在验证队列中分别为-0.005(-0.075 ~ 0.064)和-0.0002(-0.064 ~ 0.064)。基于FFRCT的虚拟支架技术可以有效预测PCI术后功能结局,是PCI手术计划的可靠工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Virtual Stenting Based on Fractional Flow Reserve Derived from Computed Tomography in Predicting Post-Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Functional Outcomes: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

With the advancement of fractional flow reserve (FFR) derived from computed tomography (FFRCT), virtual stenting technology has gradually developed. This study investigated the performance of virtual stenting based on FFRCT in predicting post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) FFR. Data from 75 patients (78 blood vessels) was collected retrospectively. We randomly allocated the participants to discovery (n = 26) and validation (n = 52) cohorts. The FFRCT was calculated using pre-PCI coronary computed tomography angiography images. Virtual stent implantation was simulated using blinded and non-blinded virtual stenting methods to obtain post-virtual stenting FFRCT. The median FFRCT before PCI and invasive FFR were 0.70 (0.60-0.77) and 0.69 (0.63-0.76), respectively. The median FFRCT were 0.91 (0.86-0.95) and 0.91 (0.87-0.94) in the blinded and non-blinded groups, respectively; the invasive post-PCI FFR was 0.90 (0.88-0.93). The difference between the FFRCT after using the blinded/non-blinded method and the invasive post-PCI FFR were 0.010 (95% limits of agreement: -0.064 to 0.084) and 0.009 (-0.050 to 0.068) in the discovery cohort and -0.005 (-0.075 to 0.064) and -0.0002 (-0.064 to 0.064) in the validation cohort, respectively. Virtual stenting technology based on FFRCT can effectively predict functional outcomes after PCI and could be a reliable tool for PCI procedural planning.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease
Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
381
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信