Isabel A Ryan, Helen Y Zhou, Mattia A Mahmoud, Philip D Tolley, Dillan F Villavisanis, Nicholas A Han, Allison C Hu, Jordan W Swanson, Scott P Bartlett, Jesse A Taylor
{"title":"眼眶远距矫正后的长期结果:客观摄影测量和患者报告结果的评估。","authors":"Isabel A Ryan, Helen Y Zhou, Mattia A Mahmoud, Philip D Tolley, Dillan F Villavisanis, Nicholas A Han, Allison C Hu, Jordan W Swanson, Scott P Bartlett, Jesse A Taylor","doi":"10.1097/SCS.0000000000012001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Orbital hypertelorism (OHT) can be corrected surgically utilizing a 4-wall box osteotomy, facial bipartition, or medial orbital composite unit translocation (MOCUT). However, the impact on periorbital symmetry and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) is less well known. This study assesses periorbital symmetry and PROs after OHT correction at long-term follow-up. Patients who underwent OHT correction at a single institution from 2000 to 2024 were identified. Hypertelorism index (HI) and periorbital symmetry was compared preoperatively, 1-year postoperatively, and at long-term follow-up (average 9 y postoperation), with a ratio of 1 considered perfect symmetry. FACE-Q surveys were administered postoperatively and converted to Rasch scores (0-100 scale). 30 patients were included, 7 of which completed the FACE-Q. 60.0% (n=18) were patients with frontonasal dysplasia, 17% (n=5) facial cleft, and 13% (n=4) with encephalocele. Seventy percent (n=21) underwent 4-wall box osteotomy, 17% (n=5) facial bipartition, and 13% (n=4) MOCUT. HI improved from preoperation (1.8±0.6) to 1-year (1.4±0.3) and long-term (1.4±0.3) postoperation (P<0.001). Palpebral height ratio was significantly worse 1-year (0.9±0.1 versus 1.0±0.2, P=0.03) and long-term (0.9±0.1 versus 1.0±0.2, P=0.02) postoperation compared with preoperation. At long-term follow-up, canthal tilt difference (4.3±4.9 versus 1.8±2.2 degrees, P=0.03) was significantly worse than preoperation. FACE-Q scores were low in domains of facial appearance with medians ranging from 16 (head shape)-32 (forehead). At long-term follow-up, hypertelorism shows stable and significant improvement with surgical correction. However, periorbital asymmetry worsened as shown by canthal tilt and palpebral height difference postoperatively. In addition, patient satisfaction with appearance remains low despite surgical intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":15462,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-Term Outcomes After Orbital Hypertelorism Correction: An Assessment of Objective Photogrammetric and Patient-Reported Outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Isabel A Ryan, Helen Y Zhou, Mattia A Mahmoud, Philip D Tolley, Dillan F Villavisanis, Nicholas A Han, Allison C Hu, Jordan W Swanson, Scott P Bartlett, Jesse A Taylor\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/SCS.0000000000012001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Orbital hypertelorism (OHT) can be corrected surgically utilizing a 4-wall box osteotomy, facial bipartition, or medial orbital composite unit translocation (MOCUT). However, the impact on periorbital symmetry and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) is less well known. This study assesses periorbital symmetry and PROs after OHT correction at long-term follow-up. Patients who underwent OHT correction at a single institution from 2000 to 2024 were identified. Hypertelorism index (HI) and periorbital symmetry was compared preoperatively, 1-year postoperatively, and at long-term follow-up (average 9 y postoperation), with a ratio of 1 considered perfect symmetry. FACE-Q surveys were administered postoperatively and converted to Rasch scores (0-100 scale). 30 patients were included, 7 of which completed the FACE-Q. 60.0% (n=18) were patients with frontonasal dysplasia, 17% (n=5) facial cleft, and 13% (n=4) with encephalocele. Seventy percent (n=21) underwent 4-wall box osteotomy, 17% (n=5) facial bipartition, and 13% (n=4) MOCUT. HI improved from preoperation (1.8±0.6) to 1-year (1.4±0.3) and long-term (1.4±0.3) postoperation (P<0.001). Palpebral height ratio was significantly worse 1-year (0.9±0.1 versus 1.0±0.2, P=0.03) and long-term (0.9±0.1 versus 1.0±0.2, P=0.02) postoperation compared with preoperation. At long-term follow-up, canthal tilt difference (4.3±4.9 versus 1.8±2.2 degrees, P=0.03) was significantly worse than preoperation. FACE-Q scores were low in domains of facial appearance with medians ranging from 16 (head shape)-32 (forehead). At long-term follow-up, hypertelorism shows stable and significant improvement with surgical correction. However, periorbital asymmetry worsened as shown by canthal tilt and palpebral height difference postoperatively. In addition, patient satisfaction with appearance remains low despite surgical intervention.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15462,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000012001\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000012001","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Long-Term Outcomes After Orbital Hypertelorism Correction: An Assessment of Objective Photogrammetric and Patient-Reported Outcomes.
Orbital hypertelorism (OHT) can be corrected surgically utilizing a 4-wall box osteotomy, facial bipartition, or medial orbital composite unit translocation (MOCUT). However, the impact on periorbital symmetry and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) is less well known. This study assesses periorbital symmetry and PROs after OHT correction at long-term follow-up. Patients who underwent OHT correction at a single institution from 2000 to 2024 were identified. Hypertelorism index (HI) and periorbital symmetry was compared preoperatively, 1-year postoperatively, and at long-term follow-up (average 9 y postoperation), with a ratio of 1 considered perfect symmetry. FACE-Q surveys were administered postoperatively and converted to Rasch scores (0-100 scale). 30 patients were included, 7 of which completed the FACE-Q. 60.0% (n=18) were patients with frontonasal dysplasia, 17% (n=5) facial cleft, and 13% (n=4) with encephalocele. Seventy percent (n=21) underwent 4-wall box osteotomy, 17% (n=5) facial bipartition, and 13% (n=4) MOCUT. HI improved from preoperation (1.8±0.6) to 1-year (1.4±0.3) and long-term (1.4±0.3) postoperation (P<0.001). Palpebral height ratio was significantly worse 1-year (0.9±0.1 versus 1.0±0.2, P=0.03) and long-term (0.9±0.1 versus 1.0±0.2, P=0.02) postoperation compared with preoperation. At long-term follow-up, canthal tilt difference (4.3±4.9 versus 1.8±2.2 degrees, P=0.03) was significantly worse than preoperation. FACE-Q scores were low in domains of facial appearance with medians ranging from 16 (head shape)-32 (forehead). At long-term follow-up, hypertelorism shows stable and significant improvement with surgical correction. However, periorbital asymmetry worsened as shown by canthal tilt and palpebral height difference postoperatively. In addition, patient satisfaction with appearance remains low despite surgical intervention.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery serves as a forum of communication for all those involved in craniofacial surgery, maxillofacial surgery and pediatric plastic surgery. Coverage ranges from practical aspects of craniofacial surgery to the basic science that underlies surgical practice. The journal publishes original articles, scientific reviews, editorials and invited commentary, abstracts and selected articles from international journals, and occasional international bibliographies in craniofacial surgery.