新一代人工晶状体计算公式在青光眼和对照眼白内障术后屈光预测的准确性。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Numan Eraslan, Ayşe Nur Çoban, Ahsen Güleç
{"title":"新一代人工晶状体计算公式在青光眼和对照眼白内障术后屈光预测的准确性。","authors":"Numan Eraslan, Ayşe Nur Çoban, Ahsen Güleç","doi":"10.1007/s10792-025-03772-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the deviation from the target refraction after cataract surgery between glaucomatous and control eyes using a third-generation formula (SRK/T), a fourth-generation formula (Barrett Universal II), and new-generation formulas (Hill-RBF, Kane, Pearl-DGS, Hoffer QST, EVO, Cooke K6).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 80 eyes of 80 patients who underwent uncomplicated phacoemulsification between 2017 and 2022. Among them, 22 had primary open-angle glaucoma, 27 had pseudoexfoliative glaucoma (PEG), and 31 served as controls. Biometric measurements were obtained preoperatively, and postoperative refractions were measured with an autorefractometer. The mean follow-up was 2 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference among the groups in terms of age, gender, intraocular lens (IOL) power, follow-up duration, axial length, anterior chamber depth, lens thickness, central corneal thickness, or intraocular pressure (all p > 0.05). All formulas produced a mean myopic prediction error in all three groups, with the highest deviation observed in the PEG group (mean: - 0.24 D). The smallest mean errors in all groups were with the Barrett Universal II (- 0.03 D, - 0.16 D, and - 0.07 D) and Hoffer QST (- 0.05 D, - 0.20 D, and - 0.08 D) formulas. The refractive prediction error was significantly lower for all formulas in eyes implanted with aspheric IOLs (mean: - 0.07 D) compared to spherical IOLs (mean: - 0.22 D) (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite advances in IOL calculation formulas, PEG patients showed the highest prediction errors, likely due to zonular weakness. In these cases, selecting Barrett Universal II or Hoffer QST formulas may improve refractive outcomes. Aspheric IOLs also showed better prediction accuracy, though their benefit may vary with pupil size and IOL alignment.</p>","PeriodicalId":14473,"journal":{"name":"International Ophthalmology","volume":"45 1","pages":"386"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Refractive prediction accuracy of new generation IOL calculation formulas in glaucomatous and control eyes after cataract surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Numan Eraslan, Ayşe Nur Çoban, Ahsen Güleç\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10792-025-03772-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the deviation from the target refraction after cataract surgery between glaucomatous and control eyes using a third-generation formula (SRK/T), a fourth-generation formula (Barrett Universal II), and new-generation formulas (Hill-RBF, Kane, Pearl-DGS, Hoffer QST, EVO, Cooke K6).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 80 eyes of 80 patients who underwent uncomplicated phacoemulsification between 2017 and 2022. Among them, 22 had primary open-angle glaucoma, 27 had pseudoexfoliative glaucoma (PEG), and 31 served as controls. Biometric measurements were obtained preoperatively, and postoperative refractions were measured with an autorefractometer. The mean follow-up was 2 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference among the groups in terms of age, gender, intraocular lens (IOL) power, follow-up duration, axial length, anterior chamber depth, lens thickness, central corneal thickness, or intraocular pressure (all p > 0.05). All formulas produced a mean myopic prediction error in all three groups, with the highest deviation observed in the PEG group (mean: - 0.24 D). The smallest mean errors in all groups were with the Barrett Universal II (- 0.03 D, - 0.16 D, and - 0.07 D) and Hoffer QST (- 0.05 D, - 0.20 D, and - 0.08 D) formulas. The refractive prediction error was significantly lower for all formulas in eyes implanted with aspheric IOLs (mean: - 0.07 D) compared to spherical IOLs (mean: - 0.22 D) (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite advances in IOL calculation formulas, PEG patients showed the highest prediction errors, likely due to zonular weakness. In these cases, selecting Barrett Universal II or Hoffer QST formulas may improve refractive outcomes. Aspheric IOLs also showed better prediction accuracy, though their benefit may vary with pupil size and IOL alignment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14473,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"386\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-025-03772-3\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-025-03772-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较第三代公式(SRK/T)、第四代公式(Barrett Universal II)和新一代公式(Hill-RBF、Kane、Pearl-DGS、Hoffer QST、EVO、Cooke K6)对青光眼和对照眼白内障术后目标屈光度偏差的影响。材料与方法:本回顾性研究纳入2017 - 2022年间行无并发症超声乳化术的80例患者的80只眼。其中原发性开角型青光眼22例,假剥脱性青光眼(PEG) 27例,对照组31例。术前进行生物特征测量,术后用自动屈光计测量屈光。平均随访时间为2年。结果:两组患者年龄、性别、人工晶状体度数、随访时间、眼轴长度、前房深度、晶状体厚度、角膜中央厚度、眼压差异均无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。所有公式在三组中均产生平均近视预测误差,其中PEG组的偏差最大(平均值:- 0.24 D)。Barrett Universal II (- 0.03 D, - 0.16 D, - 0.07 D)和Hoffer QST (- 0.05 D, - 0.20 D, - 0.08 D)公式的平均误差最小。与球面IOL(平均:- 0.22 D)相比,非球面IOL的所有配方的屈光预测误差均显著降低(平均:- 0.07 D) (p结论:尽管人工晶状体计算公式有所进步,但PEG患者的预测误差最高,可能是由于晶状体带弱。在这种情况下,选择Barrett Universal II或Hoffer QST配方可以改善屈光结果。非球面IOL也显示出更好的预测准确性,尽管其效益可能因瞳孔大小和IOL对齐而异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Refractive prediction accuracy of new generation IOL calculation formulas in glaucomatous and control eyes after cataract surgery.

Purpose: To compare the deviation from the target refraction after cataract surgery between glaucomatous and control eyes using a third-generation formula (SRK/T), a fourth-generation formula (Barrett Universal II), and new-generation formulas (Hill-RBF, Kane, Pearl-DGS, Hoffer QST, EVO, Cooke K6).

Materials and methods: This retrospective study included 80 eyes of 80 patients who underwent uncomplicated phacoemulsification between 2017 and 2022. Among them, 22 had primary open-angle glaucoma, 27 had pseudoexfoliative glaucoma (PEG), and 31 served as controls. Biometric measurements were obtained preoperatively, and postoperative refractions were measured with an autorefractometer. The mean follow-up was 2 years.

Results: There was no significant difference among the groups in terms of age, gender, intraocular lens (IOL) power, follow-up duration, axial length, anterior chamber depth, lens thickness, central corneal thickness, or intraocular pressure (all p > 0.05). All formulas produced a mean myopic prediction error in all three groups, with the highest deviation observed in the PEG group (mean: - 0.24 D). The smallest mean errors in all groups were with the Barrett Universal II (- 0.03 D, - 0.16 D, and - 0.07 D) and Hoffer QST (- 0.05 D, - 0.20 D, and - 0.08 D) formulas. The refractive prediction error was significantly lower for all formulas in eyes implanted with aspheric IOLs (mean: - 0.07 D) compared to spherical IOLs (mean: - 0.22 D) (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: Despite advances in IOL calculation formulas, PEG patients showed the highest prediction errors, likely due to zonular weakness. In these cases, selecting Barrett Universal II or Hoffer QST formulas may improve refractive outcomes. Aspheric IOLs also showed better prediction accuracy, though their benefit may vary with pupil size and IOL alignment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
451
期刊介绍: International Ophthalmology provides the clinician with articles on all the relevant subspecialties of ophthalmology, with a broad international scope. The emphasis is on presentation of the latest clinical research in the field. In addition, the journal includes regular sections devoted to new developments in technologies, products, and techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信