基于因子分析的定量内分型改善了与CRS横断面和纵向结果的关联。

IF 6.8 2区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Brooke N Gleason, Zhidi Luo, Aditi Agarwal, Siyuan Dong, Regan L Harmon, Junqin Bai, Chun-Kang Liao, Julia Huang, David B Conley, Kevin C Welch, Robert C Kern, Stephanie S Smith, Anju T Peters, Whitney S Stevens, Atsushi Kato, Lutfiyya N Muhammad, Bruce K Tan
{"title":"基于因子分析的定量内分型改善了与CRS横断面和纵向结果的关联。","authors":"Brooke N Gleason, Zhidi Luo, Aditi Agarwal, Siyuan Dong, Regan L Harmon, Junqin Bai, Chun-Kang Liao, Julia Huang, David B Conley, Kevin C Welch, Robert C Kern, Stephanie S Smith, Anju T Peters, Whitney S Stevens, Atsushi Kato, Lutfiyya N Muhammad, Bruce K Tan","doi":"10.1002/alr.70027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a heterogeneous inflammatory disease characterized by persistent sinonasal inflammation. There is increasing interest in endotype-based classification, which categorizes CRS based on underlying inflammatory pathways. We applied factor analysis to facilitate continuous endotype assignment to CRS patients and assess cross-sectional and longitudinal CRS outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We prospectively enrolled 203 patients (52 controls, 88 CRSsNP, and 63 CRSwNP) undergoing endoscopic nasal or sinus surgery (ESS). Middle meatal mucus biomarkers were analyzed pre-ESS (V0) and 6-12 months post-ESS (V1). Factor analysis was performed to identify latent factors. Factor scores were generated, and statistical analyses were conducted to assess correlations with radiographic (Lund-Mackay [LM]) and patient-reported (SNOT-22, CRS-PRO) outcomes measured at V0, V1, and V2 (1.5-5 years post-ESS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four factors were identified: Type 1 (T1), Type 2 (T2), Type 3 (T3), and macrophage-associated (M). CRSwNP patients had higher T2 and M factor scores than CRSsNP and controls. T2, T3, and M factor scores demonstrated stronger or equivalent associations with radiographic and patient-reported outcomes compared to individual biomarkers. Following ESS, median T2 and M factor scores significantly declined, while T1 and T3 remained stable. V0 T1 and T2 were weakly associated with long-term (V2) radiographic and symptom scores. V1 factor scores were more consistently predictive of long-term (V2) outcomes, with T2, T3, and M demonstrating modest correlations with radiographic severity and CRS-PRO.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Factor analysis identifies distinct, quantifiable patterns of inflammation in CRS, offering improved associations with cross-sectional and longitudinal outcomes compared to individual biomarkers.</p>","PeriodicalId":13716,"journal":{"name":"International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factor Analysis-Based Quantitative Endotyping Improves Associations With CRS Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Brooke N Gleason, Zhidi Luo, Aditi Agarwal, Siyuan Dong, Regan L Harmon, Junqin Bai, Chun-Kang Liao, Julia Huang, David B Conley, Kevin C Welch, Robert C Kern, Stephanie S Smith, Anju T Peters, Whitney S Stevens, Atsushi Kato, Lutfiyya N Muhammad, Bruce K Tan\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/alr.70027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a heterogeneous inflammatory disease characterized by persistent sinonasal inflammation. There is increasing interest in endotype-based classification, which categorizes CRS based on underlying inflammatory pathways. We applied factor analysis to facilitate continuous endotype assignment to CRS patients and assess cross-sectional and longitudinal CRS outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We prospectively enrolled 203 patients (52 controls, 88 CRSsNP, and 63 CRSwNP) undergoing endoscopic nasal or sinus surgery (ESS). Middle meatal mucus biomarkers were analyzed pre-ESS (V0) and 6-12 months post-ESS (V1). Factor analysis was performed to identify latent factors. Factor scores were generated, and statistical analyses were conducted to assess correlations with radiographic (Lund-Mackay [LM]) and patient-reported (SNOT-22, CRS-PRO) outcomes measured at V0, V1, and V2 (1.5-5 years post-ESS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four factors were identified: Type 1 (T1), Type 2 (T2), Type 3 (T3), and macrophage-associated (M). CRSwNP patients had higher T2 and M factor scores than CRSsNP and controls. T2, T3, and M factor scores demonstrated stronger or equivalent associations with radiographic and patient-reported outcomes compared to individual biomarkers. Following ESS, median T2 and M factor scores significantly declined, while T1 and T3 remained stable. V0 T1 and T2 were weakly associated with long-term (V2) radiographic and symptom scores. V1 factor scores were more consistently predictive of long-term (V2) outcomes, with T2, T3, and M demonstrating modest correlations with radiographic severity and CRS-PRO.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Factor analysis identifies distinct, quantifiable patterns of inflammation in CRS, offering improved associations with cross-sectional and longitudinal outcomes compared to individual biomarkers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13716,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/alr.70027\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/alr.70027","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:慢性鼻窦炎(CRS)是一种以持续鼻窦炎症为特征的异质性炎症性疾病。人们对基于内源性的分类越来越感兴趣,这种分类基于潜在的炎症途径对CRS进行分类。我们应用因子分析来促进对CRS患者的持续内型分配,并评估横断面和纵向CRS结果。方法:我们前瞻性地招募了203例接受鼻内镜或鼻窦手术(ESS)的患者(52例对照,88例crswsnp和63例CRSwNP)。分析ess前(V0)和ess后6-12个月(V1)中期金属黏液生物标志物。进行因子分析以确定潜在因素。生成因子评分,并进行统计分析,以评估在V0、V1和V2 (ess后1.5-5年)测量的放射学(Lund-Mackay [LM])和患者报告(SNOT-22, CRS-PRO)结果的相关性。结果:确定了四种因素:1型(T1)、2型(T2)、3型(T3)和巨噬细胞相关(M)。CRSwNP患者的T2和M因子评分高于CRSsNP和对照组。与个体生物标志物相比,T2、T3和M因子评分与放射学和患者报告的结果显示出更强或同等的相关性。ESS后T2和M因子评分中位数明显下降,T1和T3保持稳定。V0 T1和T2与长期(V2)影像学和症状评分相关性较弱。V1因子评分更一致地预测长期(V2)结果,T2、T3和M与放射学严重程度和CRS-PRO表现出适度的相关性。结论:与个体生物标志物相比,因子分析确定了CRS中不同的、可量化的炎症模式,提供了与横断面和纵向结果的更好关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Factor Analysis-Based Quantitative Endotyping Improves Associations With CRS Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Outcomes.

Background: Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a heterogeneous inflammatory disease characterized by persistent sinonasal inflammation. There is increasing interest in endotype-based classification, which categorizes CRS based on underlying inflammatory pathways. We applied factor analysis to facilitate continuous endotype assignment to CRS patients and assess cross-sectional and longitudinal CRS outcomes.

Methods: We prospectively enrolled 203 patients (52 controls, 88 CRSsNP, and 63 CRSwNP) undergoing endoscopic nasal or sinus surgery (ESS). Middle meatal mucus biomarkers were analyzed pre-ESS (V0) and 6-12 months post-ESS (V1). Factor analysis was performed to identify latent factors. Factor scores were generated, and statistical analyses were conducted to assess correlations with radiographic (Lund-Mackay [LM]) and patient-reported (SNOT-22, CRS-PRO) outcomes measured at V0, V1, and V2 (1.5-5 years post-ESS).

Results: Four factors were identified: Type 1 (T1), Type 2 (T2), Type 3 (T3), and macrophage-associated (M). CRSwNP patients had higher T2 and M factor scores than CRSsNP and controls. T2, T3, and M factor scores demonstrated stronger or equivalent associations with radiographic and patient-reported outcomes compared to individual biomarkers. Following ESS, median T2 and M factor scores significantly declined, while T1 and T3 remained stable. V0 T1 and T2 were weakly associated with long-term (V2) radiographic and symptom scores. V1 factor scores were more consistently predictive of long-term (V2) outcomes, with T2, T3, and M demonstrating modest correlations with radiographic severity and CRS-PRO.

Conclusions: Factor analysis identifies distinct, quantifiable patterns of inflammation in CRS, offering improved associations with cross-sectional and longitudinal outcomes compared to individual biomarkers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
10.90%
发文量
185
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Forum of Allergy & Rhinologyis a peer-reviewed scientific journal, and the Official Journal of the American Rhinologic Society and the American Academy of Otolaryngic Allergy. International Forum of Allergy Rhinology provides a forum for clinical researchers, basic scientists, clinicians, and others to publish original research and explore controversies in the medical and surgical treatment of patients with otolaryngic allergy, rhinologic, and skull base conditions. The application of current research to the management of otolaryngic allergy, rhinologic, and skull base diseases and the need for further investigation will be highlighted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信