Helena Crawshaw, Laura Rubio-Cirilo, Hilary Johnson, Safwan Jamal, Sarah Hickey, Jessica Gunn, Iman Ali, Gill Coombes, Carlos Acebes
{"title":"肌肉骨骼超声评估改变中度疾病活动的类风湿关节炎患者的管理决策。","authors":"Helena Crawshaw, Laura Rubio-Cirilo, Hilary Johnson, Safwan Jamal, Sarah Hickey, Jessica Gunn, Iman Ali, Gill Coombes, Carlos Acebes","doi":"10.1111/1756-185x.70415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSUS) provides valuable information about disease activity and anatomical damage in rheumatoid arthritis (RA); therefore, in combination with clinical assessment, it may be a useful tool in clinical decision-making with treatment.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>(1) To evaluate the impact of MSUS assessment on treatment decisions in patients with moderately active RA receiving conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs). (2) To determine the level of concordance between MSUS assessment and DAS28 in these patients.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>RA patients with a DAS-28 ranging from 3.22–5.1, inadequate response to csDMARDs, and indication for escalating treatment were enrolled. All patients underwent an ultrasound (US) examination (B and PD modes) of the bilateral 5-joint count (5USJC), the symptomatic joints of the DAS-28 score (28USJC), and of a comprehensive 78-joint count (78USJC). A Likert scale (pre- and post-MSUS) was used to assess patients' and clinicians' desires to escalate treatment. The outcome of the treatment decision based on US assessment was reviewed at 24 months' follow-up.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Among the 27 patients included, the mean (SD) DAS-28 score was 4.4 (0.7). Following US assessment, there was a change in the decision to escalate treatment in 18 patients (66.7%), and at a median follow-up of 24 months, only in 5 of the 18 patients had the treatment had been escalated. Treatment escalation was associated with a higher US score across all assessments (5USJC, 28USJC, 78USJC) (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The 78USJC was the most reliably aligned with the treatment decision (<i>p</i> = 0.009). A comparison of the US and clinical assessment revealed poor concordance between all variables of the DAS-28 and US scores, except for the swollen joint count.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The addition of MSUS assessment to the DAS-28 score affected management decisions in 66.7% of patients.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14330,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Rheumatic Diseases","volume":"28 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Musculoskeletal Ultrasound Assessment Changes Management Decisions in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients With Moderate Disease Activity\",\"authors\":\"Helena Crawshaw, Laura Rubio-Cirilo, Hilary Johnson, Safwan Jamal, Sarah Hickey, Jessica Gunn, Iman Ali, Gill Coombes, Carlos Acebes\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1756-185x.70415\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSUS) provides valuable information about disease activity and anatomical damage in rheumatoid arthritis (RA); therefore, in combination with clinical assessment, it may be a useful tool in clinical decision-making with treatment.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>(1) To evaluate the impact of MSUS assessment on treatment decisions in patients with moderately active RA receiving conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs). (2) To determine the level of concordance between MSUS assessment and DAS28 in these patients.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>RA patients with a DAS-28 ranging from 3.22–5.1, inadequate response to csDMARDs, and indication for escalating treatment were enrolled. All patients underwent an ultrasound (US) examination (B and PD modes) of the bilateral 5-joint count (5USJC), the symptomatic joints of the DAS-28 score (28USJC), and of a comprehensive 78-joint count (78USJC). A Likert scale (pre- and post-MSUS) was used to assess patients' and clinicians' desires to escalate treatment. The outcome of the treatment decision based on US assessment was reviewed at 24 months' follow-up.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Among the 27 patients included, the mean (SD) DAS-28 score was 4.4 (0.7). Following US assessment, there was a change in the decision to escalate treatment in 18 patients (66.7%), and at a median follow-up of 24 months, only in 5 of the 18 patients had the treatment had been escalated. Treatment escalation was associated with a higher US score across all assessments (5USJC, 28USJC, 78USJC) (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The 78USJC was the most reliably aligned with the treatment decision (<i>p</i> = 0.009). A comparison of the US and clinical assessment revealed poor concordance between all variables of the DAS-28 and US scores, except for the swollen joint count.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>The addition of MSUS assessment to the DAS-28 score affected management decisions in 66.7% of patients.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14330,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Rheumatic Diseases\",\"volume\":\"28 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Rheumatic Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1756-185x.70415\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Rheumatic Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1756-185x.70415","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Musculoskeletal Ultrasound Assessment Changes Management Decisions in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients With Moderate Disease Activity
Background
Musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSUS) provides valuable information about disease activity and anatomical damage in rheumatoid arthritis (RA); therefore, in combination with clinical assessment, it may be a useful tool in clinical decision-making with treatment.
Objectives
(1) To evaluate the impact of MSUS assessment on treatment decisions in patients with moderately active RA receiving conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs). (2) To determine the level of concordance between MSUS assessment and DAS28 in these patients.
Methods
RA patients with a DAS-28 ranging from 3.22–5.1, inadequate response to csDMARDs, and indication for escalating treatment were enrolled. All patients underwent an ultrasound (US) examination (B and PD modes) of the bilateral 5-joint count (5USJC), the symptomatic joints of the DAS-28 score (28USJC), and of a comprehensive 78-joint count (78USJC). A Likert scale (pre- and post-MSUS) was used to assess patients' and clinicians' desires to escalate treatment. The outcome of the treatment decision based on US assessment was reviewed at 24 months' follow-up.
Results
Among the 27 patients included, the mean (SD) DAS-28 score was 4.4 (0.7). Following US assessment, there was a change in the decision to escalate treatment in 18 patients (66.7%), and at a median follow-up of 24 months, only in 5 of the 18 patients had the treatment had been escalated. Treatment escalation was associated with a higher US score across all assessments (5USJC, 28USJC, 78USJC) (p < 0.05). The 78USJC was the most reliably aligned with the treatment decision (p = 0.009). A comparison of the US and clinical assessment revealed poor concordance between all variables of the DAS-28 and US scores, except for the swollen joint count.
Conclusion
The addition of MSUS assessment to the DAS-28 score affected management decisions in 66.7% of patients.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Rheumatic Diseases (formerly APLAR Journal of Rheumatology) is the official journal of the Asia Pacific League of Associations for Rheumatology. The Journal accepts original articles on clinical or experimental research pertinent to the rheumatic diseases, work on connective tissue diseases and other immune and allergic disorders. The acceptance criteria for all papers are the quality and originality of the research and its significance to our readership. Except where otherwise stated, manuscripts are peer reviewed by two anonymous reviewers and the Editor.