肌肉骨骼超声评估改变中度疾病活动的类风湿关节炎患者的管理决策。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 RHEUMATOLOGY
Helena Crawshaw, Laura Rubio-Cirilo, Hilary Johnson, Safwan Jamal, Sarah Hickey, Jessica Gunn, Iman Ali, Gill Coombes, Carlos Acebes
{"title":"肌肉骨骼超声评估改变中度疾病活动的类风湿关节炎患者的管理决策。","authors":"Helena Crawshaw,&nbsp;Laura Rubio-Cirilo,&nbsp;Hilary Johnson,&nbsp;Safwan Jamal,&nbsp;Sarah Hickey,&nbsp;Jessica Gunn,&nbsp;Iman Ali,&nbsp;Gill Coombes,&nbsp;Carlos Acebes","doi":"10.1111/1756-185x.70415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSUS) provides valuable information about disease activity and anatomical damage in rheumatoid arthritis (RA); therefore, in combination with clinical assessment, it may be a useful tool in clinical decision-making with treatment.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>(1) To evaluate the impact of MSUS assessment on treatment decisions in patients with moderately active RA receiving conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs). (2) To determine the level of concordance between MSUS assessment and DAS28 in these patients.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>RA patients with a DAS-28 ranging from 3.22–5.1, inadequate response to csDMARDs, and indication for escalating treatment were enrolled. All patients underwent an ultrasound (US) examination (B and PD modes) of the bilateral 5-joint count (5USJC), the symptomatic joints of the DAS-28 score (28USJC), and of a comprehensive 78-joint count (78USJC). A Likert scale (pre- and post-MSUS) was used to assess patients' and clinicians' desires to escalate treatment. The outcome of the treatment decision based on US assessment was reviewed at 24 months' follow-up.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Among the 27 patients included, the mean (SD) DAS-28 score was 4.4 (0.7). Following US assessment, there was a change in the decision to escalate treatment in 18 patients (66.7%), and at a median follow-up of 24 months, only in 5 of the 18 patients had the treatment had been escalated. Treatment escalation was associated with a higher US score across all assessments (5USJC, 28USJC, 78USJC) (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). The 78USJC was the most reliably aligned with the treatment decision (<i>p</i> = 0.009). A comparison of the US and clinical assessment revealed poor concordance between all variables of the DAS-28 and US scores, except for the swollen joint count.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The addition of MSUS assessment to the DAS-28 score affected management decisions in 66.7% of patients.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14330,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Rheumatic Diseases","volume":"28 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Musculoskeletal Ultrasound Assessment Changes Management Decisions in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients With Moderate Disease Activity\",\"authors\":\"Helena Crawshaw,&nbsp;Laura Rubio-Cirilo,&nbsp;Hilary Johnson,&nbsp;Safwan Jamal,&nbsp;Sarah Hickey,&nbsp;Jessica Gunn,&nbsp;Iman Ali,&nbsp;Gill Coombes,&nbsp;Carlos Acebes\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1756-185x.70415\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSUS) provides valuable information about disease activity and anatomical damage in rheumatoid arthritis (RA); therefore, in combination with clinical assessment, it may be a useful tool in clinical decision-making with treatment.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>(1) To evaluate the impact of MSUS assessment on treatment decisions in patients with moderately active RA receiving conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs). (2) To determine the level of concordance between MSUS assessment and DAS28 in these patients.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>RA patients with a DAS-28 ranging from 3.22–5.1, inadequate response to csDMARDs, and indication for escalating treatment were enrolled. All patients underwent an ultrasound (US) examination (B and PD modes) of the bilateral 5-joint count (5USJC), the symptomatic joints of the DAS-28 score (28USJC), and of a comprehensive 78-joint count (78USJC). A Likert scale (pre- and post-MSUS) was used to assess patients' and clinicians' desires to escalate treatment. The outcome of the treatment decision based on US assessment was reviewed at 24 months' follow-up.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Among the 27 patients included, the mean (SD) DAS-28 score was 4.4 (0.7). Following US assessment, there was a change in the decision to escalate treatment in 18 patients (66.7%), and at a median follow-up of 24 months, only in 5 of the 18 patients had the treatment had been escalated. Treatment escalation was associated with a higher US score across all assessments (5USJC, 28USJC, 78USJC) (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). The 78USJC was the most reliably aligned with the treatment decision (<i>p</i> = 0.009). A comparison of the US and clinical assessment revealed poor concordance between all variables of the DAS-28 and US scores, except for the swollen joint count.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>The addition of MSUS assessment to the DAS-28 score affected management decisions in 66.7% of patients.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14330,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Rheumatic Diseases\",\"volume\":\"28 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Rheumatic Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1756-185x.70415\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Rheumatic Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1756-185x.70415","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:肌肉骨骼超声(MSUS)为类风湿关节炎(RA)的疾病活动和解剖损伤提供了有价值的信息;因此,结合临床评估,它可能是临床决策与治疗的有用工具。目的:(1)评价MSUS评估对接受常规合成疾病改善抗风湿药物(csDMARDs)的中度活动性RA患者治疗决策的影响。(2)确定这些患者的MSUS评估与DAS28的一致性水平。方法:纳入DAS-28评分范围为3.22-5.1、对csDMARDs反应不足、适应症为升级治疗的RA患者。所有患者均行双侧5关节计数(5USJC)、症状关节DAS-28评分(28USJC)和78关节综合计数(78USJC)超声检查(B模式和PD模式)。使用李克特量表(msus前和msus后)评估患者和临床医生升级治疗的愿望。在24个月的随访中回顾了基于美国评估的治疗决定的结果。结果:27例患者DAS-28评分平均(SD)为4.4分(0.7分)。在美国评估后,18名患者(66.7%)改变了升级治疗的决定,在中位随访24个月时,18名患者中只有5名患者进行了升级治疗。在所有评估(5USJC, 28USJC, 78USJC)中,治疗升级与更高的US评分相关(p结论:在DAS-28评分中增加MSUS评估影响了66.7%患者的管理决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Musculoskeletal Ultrasound Assessment Changes Management Decisions in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients With Moderate Disease Activity

Musculoskeletal Ultrasound Assessment Changes Management Decisions in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients With Moderate Disease Activity

Background

Musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSUS) provides valuable information about disease activity and anatomical damage in rheumatoid arthritis (RA); therefore, in combination with clinical assessment, it may be a useful tool in clinical decision-making with treatment.

Objectives

(1) To evaluate the impact of MSUS assessment on treatment decisions in patients with moderately active RA receiving conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs). (2) To determine the level of concordance between MSUS assessment and DAS28 in these patients.

Methods

RA patients with a DAS-28 ranging from 3.22–5.1, inadequate response to csDMARDs, and indication for escalating treatment were enrolled. All patients underwent an ultrasound (US) examination (B and PD modes) of the bilateral 5-joint count (5USJC), the symptomatic joints of the DAS-28 score (28USJC), and of a comprehensive 78-joint count (78USJC). A Likert scale (pre- and post-MSUS) was used to assess patients' and clinicians' desires to escalate treatment. The outcome of the treatment decision based on US assessment was reviewed at 24 months' follow-up.

Results

Among the 27 patients included, the mean (SD) DAS-28 score was 4.4 (0.7). Following US assessment, there was a change in the decision to escalate treatment in 18 patients (66.7%), and at a median follow-up of 24 months, only in 5 of the 18 patients had the treatment had been escalated. Treatment escalation was associated with a higher US score across all assessments (5USJC, 28USJC, 78USJC) (p < 0.05). The 78USJC was the most reliably aligned with the treatment decision (p = 0.009). A comparison of the US and clinical assessment revealed poor concordance between all variables of the DAS-28 and US scores, except for the swollen joint count.

Conclusion

The addition of MSUS assessment to the DAS-28 score affected management decisions in 66.7% of patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.00%
发文量
362
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Rheumatic Diseases (formerly APLAR Journal of Rheumatology) is the official journal of the Asia Pacific League of Associations for Rheumatology. The Journal accepts original articles on clinical or experimental research pertinent to the rheumatic diseases, work on connective tissue diseases and other immune and allergic disorders. The acceptance criteria for all papers are the quality and originality of the research and its significance to our readership. Except where otherwise stated, manuscripts are peer reviewed by two anonymous reviewers and the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信