结合虚拟围栏管理广阔牧场上的一岁阉牛:空间行为、生长性能和肠道甲烷排放。

IF 2.9 2区 农林科学 Q1 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Frontiers in Veterinary Science Pub Date : 2025-09-10 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fvets.2025.1637190
Edward J Raynor, Anna M Shadbolt, Melissa K Johnston, David J Augustine, Justin D Derner, Sean P Kearney, John P Ritten, Nathan D Delay, Pedro H V Carvalho, Juan de J Vargas, Sara E Place, Kim R Stackhouse-Lawson
{"title":"结合虚拟围栏管理广阔牧场上的一岁阉牛:空间行为、生长性能和肠道甲烷排放。","authors":"Edward J Raynor, Anna M Shadbolt, Melissa K Johnston, David J Augustine, Justin D Derner, Sean P Kearney, John P Ritten, Nathan D Delay, Pedro H V Carvalho, Juan de J Vargas, Sara E Place, Kim R Stackhouse-Lawson","doi":"10.3389/fvets.2025.1637190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We examined the spatial movement behavior, growth rates, and enteric CH<sub>4</sub> emissions of yearling beef cattle in response to spatial distribution management with virtual fencing (VF) in extensive shortgrass steppe pastures. Over the 110-d grazing season (mid-May to early September), 120 British-breed stocker steers (~12 months of age; mean body weight [BW] 382 kg ± 35) were grazed with VF management (active VF collars) or free-range (non-active VF collars) in two pairs of ~130 ha physically fenced rangeland pastures (i.e., VF-managed vs. control). One pair was associated with a diverse mosaic of soil types supporting alkalai sacaton (<i>Sporobolus airoides</i> [Torr.] Torr.), blue grama (<i>Bouteloua gracilis</i> [Willd. Ex Kunth] Lag. Ex Griffiths), and needle-and-thread (<i>Hesperostipa comata</i> [Trin. &Rupr.] Barkworth), while the other pasture-pair was associated with the Sandy Plains ecological site, primarily hosting western wheatgrass (<i>Pascopyrum smithii</i> [Rydb.] Á. Löve), needle-and-thread, and blue grama. Within each pair of pastures, one herd was rotated among sub-pastures using the VF system, which focused grazing on varying native plant communities over the growing season. In control pastures, steers had access to the entire pasture for the grazing season. Spatial distribution management with VF maintained steers within desired grazing areas occurred 94-99% of the time, even though five of the 60 VF-managed steers consistently made short daily excursions outside the VF boundary. In all four pastures, an automated head-chamber system (AHCS, i.e., GreenFeed) measured the enteric CH<sub>4</sub> emissions of individual steers. Steers that met the criteria of a minimum of 15 AHCS visits in each of at least two VF rotation intervals were analyzed for spatial behavior, growth performance, and enteric CH<sub>4</sub> emissions. Screening based on AHCS visitation requirements resulted in 15 steers (nine VF, six control) in the diverse mosaic pasture pair, and 39 (17 VF, 22 control) in the Sandy Plains pasture pair. VF management significantly reduced growth rates for all steers across both pasture pairs by an average of 9%, resulting in steers that were 7.3 kg lighter than unmanaged steers at the end of the grazing season. VF management effects on enteric CH<sub>4</sub> emissions varied among rotation intervals and pasture type. In the diverse mosaic pair, VF management significantly reduced CH<sub>4</sub> emissions during the first rotation interval, when VF steers were concentrated on the C<sub>3</sub> grass-dominated plant community, but increased emissions in the second and third intervals when VF steers were concentrated on C<sub>4</sub> grass-dominated areas. In the Sandy Plains pasture pair, where cattle were rotated between sub-pastures with and without palatable four-wing saltbush (<i>Atriplex canescens</i> [Pursh] Nutt.) shrubs, VF management reduced CH<sub>4</sub> emissions in three of four rotations as well as over the full grazing season. CH<sub>4</sub> emissions intensity increased with VF management in the diverse mosaic, but not in the Sandy Plains pastures. Overall, our findings show VF management (1) controlled animals spatially within sub-pastures, (2) did not improve growth performance but rather decreased it, (3) did not consistently reduce enteric CH<sub>4</sub> emissions, and (4) tended to increase emissions per kg of product via lowering steer growth performance. While some have posited that VF is a potential tool to reduce enteric emissions, our findings suggest VF management is not a straightforward solution for mediating the relationships between forage resources, growth performance, and enteric CH<sub>4</sub> emissions of stocker steers on extensive rangeland. Furthermore, our fusion of animal GPS tracking, growth rates and AHCS data indicated that differences in spatial behavior and weight gain were consistent between VF-managed and control steers irrespective of their AHCS-acclimation status, supporting the perspective that AHCS-based gas flux measurements are a valid means of estimating enteric emissions in extensive rangelands.</p>","PeriodicalId":12772,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Veterinary Science","volume":"12 ","pages":"1637190"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12457158/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Incorporating virtual fencing to manage yearling steers on extensive rangelands: spatial behavior, growth performance, and enteric methane emissions.\",\"authors\":\"Edward J Raynor, Anna M Shadbolt, Melissa K Johnston, David J Augustine, Justin D Derner, Sean P Kearney, John P Ritten, Nathan D Delay, Pedro H V Carvalho, Juan de J Vargas, Sara E Place, Kim R Stackhouse-Lawson\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fvets.2025.1637190\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We examined the spatial movement behavior, growth rates, and enteric CH<sub>4</sub> emissions of yearling beef cattle in response to spatial distribution management with virtual fencing (VF) in extensive shortgrass steppe pastures. Over the 110-d grazing season (mid-May to early September), 120 British-breed stocker steers (~12 months of age; mean body weight [BW] 382 kg ± 35) were grazed with VF management (active VF collars) or free-range (non-active VF collars) in two pairs of ~130 ha physically fenced rangeland pastures (i.e., VF-managed vs. control). One pair was associated with a diverse mosaic of soil types supporting alkalai sacaton (<i>Sporobolus airoides</i> [Torr.] Torr.), blue grama (<i>Bouteloua gracilis</i> [Willd. Ex Kunth] Lag. Ex Griffiths), and needle-and-thread (<i>Hesperostipa comata</i> [Trin. &Rupr.] Barkworth), while the other pasture-pair was associated with the Sandy Plains ecological site, primarily hosting western wheatgrass (<i>Pascopyrum smithii</i> [Rydb.] Á. Löve), needle-and-thread, and blue grama. Within each pair of pastures, one herd was rotated among sub-pastures using the VF system, which focused grazing on varying native plant communities over the growing season. In control pastures, steers had access to the entire pasture for the grazing season. Spatial distribution management with VF maintained steers within desired grazing areas occurred 94-99% of the time, even though five of the 60 VF-managed steers consistently made short daily excursions outside the VF boundary. In all four pastures, an automated head-chamber system (AHCS, i.e., GreenFeed) measured the enteric CH<sub>4</sub> emissions of individual steers. Steers that met the criteria of a minimum of 15 AHCS visits in each of at least two VF rotation intervals were analyzed for spatial behavior, growth performance, and enteric CH<sub>4</sub> emissions. Screening based on AHCS visitation requirements resulted in 15 steers (nine VF, six control) in the diverse mosaic pasture pair, and 39 (17 VF, 22 control) in the Sandy Plains pasture pair. VF management significantly reduced growth rates for all steers across both pasture pairs by an average of 9%, resulting in steers that were 7.3 kg lighter than unmanaged steers at the end of the grazing season. VF management effects on enteric CH<sub>4</sub> emissions varied among rotation intervals and pasture type. In the diverse mosaic pair, VF management significantly reduced CH<sub>4</sub> emissions during the first rotation interval, when VF steers were concentrated on the C<sub>3</sub> grass-dominated plant community, but increased emissions in the second and third intervals when VF steers were concentrated on C<sub>4</sub> grass-dominated areas. In the Sandy Plains pasture pair, where cattle were rotated between sub-pastures with and without palatable four-wing saltbush (<i>Atriplex canescens</i> [Pursh] Nutt.) shrubs, VF management reduced CH<sub>4</sub> emissions in three of four rotations as well as over the full grazing season. CH<sub>4</sub> emissions intensity increased with VF management in the diverse mosaic, but not in the Sandy Plains pastures. Overall, our findings show VF management (1) controlled animals spatially within sub-pastures, (2) did not improve growth performance but rather decreased it, (3) did not consistently reduce enteric CH<sub>4</sub> emissions, and (4) tended to increase emissions per kg of product via lowering steer growth performance. While some have posited that VF is a potential tool to reduce enteric emissions, our findings suggest VF management is not a straightforward solution for mediating the relationships between forage resources, growth performance, and enteric CH<sub>4</sub> emissions of stocker steers on extensive rangeland. Furthermore, our fusion of animal GPS tracking, growth rates and AHCS data indicated that differences in spatial behavior and weight gain were consistent between VF-managed and control steers irrespective of their AHCS-acclimation status, supporting the perspective that AHCS-based gas flux measurements are a valid means of estimating enteric emissions in extensive rangelands.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12772,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Veterinary Science\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"1637190\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12457158/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Veterinary Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2025.1637190\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Veterinary Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2025.1637190","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文研究了短草草原大牧区虚拟围栏(VF)管理下一岁肉牛的空间运动行为、生长速率和肠道CH4排放。在110天的放牧季节(5月中旬至9月初),120头英国种家畜阉牛(~12 月龄;平均体重[BW] 382 kg ± 35)在两对~130 公顷的物理围栏牧场(即VF管理与对照)中采用VF管理(主动VF圈)或散养(非主动VF圈)进行放牧。其中一对与支持碱孢子虫(Sporobolus airoides)的土壤类型的多样化马赛克有关。),蓝色格拉玛(布蒂洛瓦格拉利斯[野生的。[Ex Kunth] Lag。格里菲思(Ex Griffiths)和针线(Hesperostipa comata)。&Rupr。[Barkworth]),而另一个牧场对与沙平原生态遗址有关,主要是西部小麦草(Pascopyrum smithii [Rydb.])。]。Löve)、针线和蓝格子。在每对牧场内,使用VF系统在子牧场之间轮换一个牧群,该系统在生长季节集中放牧不同的本地植物群落。在对照牧场,牧牛在放牧季节可以进入整个牧场。尽管60头VF管理的牛中有5头每天都会在VF边界外进行短暂的短途旅行,但在理想放牧区域内,VF管理的牛的空间分布管理成功率为94-99%。在所有四个牧场中,一个自动头室系统(AHCS,即GreenFeed)测量了单个牛的肠道甲烷排放。在至少两个VF旋转间隔中,每次至少有15次AHCS访问的标准,分析了空间行为、生长性能和肠道CH4排放。基于AHCS访问要求的筛选结果显示,在不同的马赛克牧场组合中有15头牛(9头VF, 6头对照),在沙质平原牧场组合中有39头牛(17头VF, 22头对照)。VF管理显著降低了两个牧场中所有阉牛的平均9%的生长率,导致放牧季节结束时阉牛比未管理的阉牛轻7.3 kg。VF管理对肠道CH4排放的影响因轮作间隔和牧草类型而异。在不同的镶嵌对中,VF管理在第一个轮作间隔内显著减少了CH4的排放,当VF转向集中在C3草为主的植物群落时,而在第二和第三个轮作间隔内,当VF转向集中在C4草为主的地区时,排放显著增加。在沙地平原牧场,牛群在有或没有美味的四翼盐灌木(Atriplex canescens [Pursh] Nutt.)灌木的次级牧场之间轮作,VF管理在四次轮作中的三次以及整个放牧季节减少了CH4排放。CH4排放强度随VF管理的增加而增加,但在沙质平原牧场没有增加。总体而言,我们的研究结果表明,VF管理(1)在空间上控制了亚牧场内的动物,(2)没有提高生长性能,反而降低了生长性能,(3)没有持续减少肠道CH4排放,(4)倾向于通过降低牛的生长性能来增加每千克产品的排放量。虽然有些人认为VF是减少肠道排放的潜在工具,但我们的研究结果表明,VF管理并不是一个直接的解决方案,可以调节放牧牛的饲料资源、生长性能和肠道CH4排放之间的关系。此外,我们对动物GPS跟踪、生长速率和AHCS数据的融合表明,无论AHCS适应状态如何,vf管理和对照的牛在空间行为和体重增加方面的差异是一致的,这支持了基于AHCS的气体通量测量是估计广泛牧场肠道排放的有效手段的观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Incorporating virtual fencing to manage yearling steers on extensive rangelands: spatial behavior, growth performance, and enteric methane emissions.

We examined the spatial movement behavior, growth rates, and enteric CH4 emissions of yearling beef cattle in response to spatial distribution management with virtual fencing (VF) in extensive shortgrass steppe pastures. Over the 110-d grazing season (mid-May to early September), 120 British-breed stocker steers (~12 months of age; mean body weight [BW] 382 kg ± 35) were grazed with VF management (active VF collars) or free-range (non-active VF collars) in two pairs of ~130 ha physically fenced rangeland pastures (i.e., VF-managed vs. control). One pair was associated with a diverse mosaic of soil types supporting alkalai sacaton (Sporobolus airoides [Torr.] Torr.), blue grama (Bouteloua gracilis [Willd. Ex Kunth] Lag. Ex Griffiths), and needle-and-thread (Hesperostipa comata [Trin. &Rupr.] Barkworth), while the other pasture-pair was associated with the Sandy Plains ecological site, primarily hosting western wheatgrass (Pascopyrum smithii [Rydb.] Á. Löve), needle-and-thread, and blue grama. Within each pair of pastures, one herd was rotated among sub-pastures using the VF system, which focused grazing on varying native plant communities over the growing season. In control pastures, steers had access to the entire pasture for the grazing season. Spatial distribution management with VF maintained steers within desired grazing areas occurred 94-99% of the time, even though five of the 60 VF-managed steers consistently made short daily excursions outside the VF boundary. In all four pastures, an automated head-chamber system (AHCS, i.e., GreenFeed) measured the enteric CH4 emissions of individual steers. Steers that met the criteria of a minimum of 15 AHCS visits in each of at least two VF rotation intervals were analyzed for spatial behavior, growth performance, and enteric CH4 emissions. Screening based on AHCS visitation requirements resulted in 15 steers (nine VF, six control) in the diverse mosaic pasture pair, and 39 (17 VF, 22 control) in the Sandy Plains pasture pair. VF management significantly reduced growth rates for all steers across both pasture pairs by an average of 9%, resulting in steers that were 7.3 kg lighter than unmanaged steers at the end of the grazing season. VF management effects on enteric CH4 emissions varied among rotation intervals and pasture type. In the diverse mosaic pair, VF management significantly reduced CH4 emissions during the first rotation interval, when VF steers were concentrated on the C3 grass-dominated plant community, but increased emissions in the second and third intervals when VF steers were concentrated on C4 grass-dominated areas. In the Sandy Plains pasture pair, where cattle were rotated between sub-pastures with and without palatable four-wing saltbush (Atriplex canescens [Pursh] Nutt.) shrubs, VF management reduced CH4 emissions in three of four rotations as well as over the full grazing season. CH4 emissions intensity increased with VF management in the diverse mosaic, but not in the Sandy Plains pastures. Overall, our findings show VF management (1) controlled animals spatially within sub-pastures, (2) did not improve growth performance but rather decreased it, (3) did not consistently reduce enteric CH4 emissions, and (4) tended to increase emissions per kg of product via lowering steer growth performance. While some have posited that VF is a potential tool to reduce enteric emissions, our findings suggest VF management is not a straightforward solution for mediating the relationships between forage resources, growth performance, and enteric CH4 emissions of stocker steers on extensive rangeland. Furthermore, our fusion of animal GPS tracking, growth rates and AHCS data indicated that differences in spatial behavior and weight gain were consistent between VF-managed and control steers irrespective of their AHCS-acclimation status, supporting the perspective that AHCS-based gas flux measurements are a valid means of estimating enteric emissions in extensive rangelands.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
Frontiers in Veterinary Science Veterinary-General Veterinary
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
9.40%
发文量
1870
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Veterinary Science is a global, peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that bridges animal and human health, brings a comparative approach to medical and surgical challenges, and advances innovative biotechnology and therapy. Veterinary research today is interdisciplinary, collaborative, and socially relevant, transforming how we understand and investigate animal health and disease. Fundamental research in emerging infectious diseases, predictive genomics, stem cell therapy, and translational modelling is grounded within the integrative social context of public and environmental health, wildlife conservation, novel biomarkers, societal well-being, and cutting-edge clinical practice and specialization. Frontiers in Veterinary Science brings a 21st-century approach—networked, collaborative, and Open Access—to communicate this progress and innovation to both the specialist and to the wider audience of readers in the field. Frontiers in Veterinary Science publishes articles on outstanding discoveries across a wide spectrum of translational, foundational, and clinical research. The journal''s mission is to bring all relevant veterinary sciences together on a single platform with the goal of improving animal and human health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信