Andrei Macris, Sergiu Drafta, Ștefania Martiniuc, Alexandru E Petre
{"title":"用系统可用性量表对三种数字微笑设计软件工具的可用性进行比较评价。","authors":"Andrei Macris, Sergiu Drafta, Ștefania Martiniuc, Alexandru E Petre","doi":"10.3390/dj13090418","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives:</b> Digital Smile Design software tools facilitates aesthetic planning and improves communication between clinicians, patients, and dental laboratories. These software tools have been developed to support facial and dental analysis and to assist users in creating an ideal smile integrated with the patient's appearance. This study aimed to compare the usability of three DSD software tools-Preteeth AI Pro (version 6.0.0), SmileCloud, and Medit Link (version 3.4.3)-using the System Usability Scale. <b>Methods:</b> Twenty-three prosthodontists and prosthodontics residents evaluated each tool following a standardized usage protocol. After completing Digital Smile Designs in each application, participants filled out a 10-item System Usability Scale questionnaire (score 0-100). Descriptive statistics were calculated, and intergroup comparisons were performed using one-way ANOVA (<i>p</i> < 0.05). <b>Results:</b> Mean System Usability Scale scores were 74.24 (Preteeth AI Pro), 80.33 (SmileCloud), and 73.15 (Medit Link). SmileCloud obtained the highest score (A-grade, Curved Grading Scale), indicating \"good to very good\" usability. No statistical significances were found between the three software tools (F = 1.04, <i>p</i> = 0.36). <b>Conclusions:</b> All three Digital Smile Design software tools achieved System Usability Scale scores above the usability benchmark of 68, with SmileCloud demonstrating the most favorable user experience. These findings may assist clinicians in selecting intuitive and efficient Digital Smile Design platforms to optimize aesthetic treatment workflows.</p>","PeriodicalId":11269,"journal":{"name":"Dentistry Journal","volume":"13 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12468294/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Usability Evaluation of Three Digital Smile Design Software Tools Using the System Usability Scale.\",\"authors\":\"Andrei Macris, Sergiu Drafta, Ștefania Martiniuc, Alexandru E Petre\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/dj13090418\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives:</b> Digital Smile Design software tools facilitates aesthetic planning and improves communication between clinicians, patients, and dental laboratories. These software tools have been developed to support facial and dental analysis and to assist users in creating an ideal smile integrated with the patient's appearance. This study aimed to compare the usability of three DSD software tools-Preteeth AI Pro (version 6.0.0), SmileCloud, and Medit Link (version 3.4.3)-using the System Usability Scale. <b>Methods:</b> Twenty-three prosthodontists and prosthodontics residents evaluated each tool following a standardized usage protocol. After completing Digital Smile Designs in each application, participants filled out a 10-item System Usability Scale questionnaire (score 0-100). Descriptive statistics were calculated, and intergroup comparisons were performed using one-way ANOVA (<i>p</i> < 0.05). <b>Results:</b> Mean System Usability Scale scores were 74.24 (Preteeth AI Pro), 80.33 (SmileCloud), and 73.15 (Medit Link). SmileCloud obtained the highest score (A-grade, Curved Grading Scale), indicating \\\"good to very good\\\" usability. No statistical significances were found between the three software tools (F = 1.04, <i>p</i> = 0.36). <b>Conclusions:</b> All three Digital Smile Design software tools achieved System Usability Scale scores above the usability benchmark of 68, with SmileCloud demonstrating the most favorable user experience. These findings may assist clinicians in selecting intuitive and efficient Digital Smile Design platforms to optimize aesthetic treatment workflows.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11269,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dentistry Journal\",\"volume\":\"13 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12468294/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dentistry Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/dj13090418\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dentistry Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/dj13090418","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景/目的:数字微笑设计软件工具促进美学规划,改善临床医生、患者和牙科实验室之间的沟通。这些软件工具的开发是为了支持面部和牙齿分析,并帮助用户创造一个与患者外表相结合的理想微笑。本研究旨在使用系统可用性量表比较三种DSD软件工具- preteeth AI Pro(版本6.0.0),SmileCloud和Medit Link(版本3.4.3)的可用性。方法:23名口腔修复专家和口腔修复住院医师按照标准化的使用方案对每种工具进行评估。在每个应用程序中完成数字微笑设计后,参与者填写了一份包含10个项目的系统可用性量表问卷(得分0-100)。进行描述性统计,组间比较采用单因素方差分析(p < 0.05)。结果:系统可用性量表平均得分为74.24 (Preteeth AI Pro), 80.33 (SmileCloud)和73.15 (Medit Link)。SmileCloud获得了最高分(a级,曲线分级量表),表明“良好到非常好”的可用性。三种软件工具间差异无统计学意义(F = 1.04, p = 0.36)。结论:所有三个Digital Smile Design软件工具都达到了系统可用性量表得分高于可用性基准68分,其中SmileCloud展示了最有利的用户体验。这些发现可以帮助临床医生选择直观高效的数字微笑设计平台来优化美容治疗工作流程。
Comparative Usability Evaluation of Three Digital Smile Design Software Tools Using the System Usability Scale.
Background/Objectives: Digital Smile Design software tools facilitates aesthetic planning and improves communication between clinicians, patients, and dental laboratories. These software tools have been developed to support facial and dental analysis and to assist users in creating an ideal smile integrated with the patient's appearance. This study aimed to compare the usability of three DSD software tools-Preteeth AI Pro (version 6.0.0), SmileCloud, and Medit Link (version 3.4.3)-using the System Usability Scale. Methods: Twenty-three prosthodontists and prosthodontics residents evaluated each tool following a standardized usage protocol. After completing Digital Smile Designs in each application, participants filled out a 10-item System Usability Scale questionnaire (score 0-100). Descriptive statistics were calculated, and intergroup comparisons were performed using one-way ANOVA (p < 0.05). Results: Mean System Usability Scale scores were 74.24 (Preteeth AI Pro), 80.33 (SmileCloud), and 73.15 (Medit Link). SmileCloud obtained the highest score (A-grade, Curved Grading Scale), indicating "good to very good" usability. No statistical significances were found between the three software tools (F = 1.04, p = 0.36). Conclusions: All three Digital Smile Design software tools achieved System Usability Scale scores above the usability benchmark of 68, with SmileCloud demonstrating the most favorable user experience. These findings may assist clinicians in selecting intuitive and efficient Digital Smile Design platforms to optimize aesthetic treatment workflows.