牙科工作人员对客观结构化临床检查(OSCE)的看法:来自沙特阿拉伯的经验。

IF 3.1 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Ahmad A Alnazzawi
{"title":"牙科工作人员对客观结构化临床检查(OSCE)的看法:来自沙特阿拉伯的经验。","authors":"Ahmad A Alnazzawi","doi":"10.3390/dj13090423","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) is a widely used assessment tool in education in the health profession. Understanding faculty perceptions of the OSCE regarding fairness, validity, reliability, and effectiveness is essential to enhancing its implementation in dental education in Saudi Arabia. <b>Objective:</b> To assess dental faculty members' perceptions of the OSCE as an assessment method in Saudi Arabia, focusing on its fairness, reliability, validity, and effectiveness compared to other assessment formats. <b>Methods:</b> A cross-sectional analytical survey-based study was conducted among dental faculty members across 11 dental colleges in Saudi Arabia. A modified validated questionnaire was distributed electronically through the college deans to faculty members. Responses were analyzed using SPSS v25, applying descriptive and inferential statistics (chi-square test, significance set at <i>p</i> ≤ 0.05). <b>Results:</b> A total of 181 faculty responses from 11 Saudi dental colleges indicated broad support for the OSCE as a fair (78.3%), well-structured (71.1%), and comprehensive assessment of clinical skills (70%). While nearly half found it less stressful than other formats, 30% still perceived it as intimidating. Faculty agreed that OSCE tasks reflected taught content (65.9%), instructions were clear (75.7%), and scores were largely standardized and unbiased (63.9-72.9%). Compared with other assessment methods, essays/ short-answer questions (SAQs) were viewed as most effective for learning, but the OSCE was most favored for continued use in clinical training (52.8%). <b>Conclusions:</b> Faculty members in Saudi dental schools generally view the OSCE as a fair, valid, and effective assessment method. Despite concerns about student preparedness and perceived difficulty, the OSCE is endorsed as a key tool for evaluating clinical competencies. Addressing these concerns may further enhance its educational value and implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":11269,"journal":{"name":"Dentistry Journal","volume":"13 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12468690/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dental Staff Members' Perception Regarding Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE): An Experience from Saudi Arabia.\",\"authors\":\"Ahmad A Alnazzawi\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/dj13090423\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) is a widely used assessment tool in education in the health profession. Understanding faculty perceptions of the OSCE regarding fairness, validity, reliability, and effectiveness is essential to enhancing its implementation in dental education in Saudi Arabia. <b>Objective:</b> To assess dental faculty members' perceptions of the OSCE as an assessment method in Saudi Arabia, focusing on its fairness, reliability, validity, and effectiveness compared to other assessment formats. <b>Methods:</b> A cross-sectional analytical survey-based study was conducted among dental faculty members across 11 dental colleges in Saudi Arabia. A modified validated questionnaire was distributed electronically through the college deans to faculty members. Responses were analyzed using SPSS v25, applying descriptive and inferential statistics (chi-square test, significance set at <i>p</i> ≤ 0.05). <b>Results:</b> A total of 181 faculty responses from 11 Saudi dental colleges indicated broad support for the OSCE as a fair (78.3%), well-structured (71.1%), and comprehensive assessment of clinical skills (70%). While nearly half found it less stressful than other formats, 30% still perceived it as intimidating. Faculty agreed that OSCE tasks reflected taught content (65.9%), instructions were clear (75.7%), and scores were largely standardized and unbiased (63.9-72.9%). Compared with other assessment methods, essays/ short-answer questions (SAQs) were viewed as most effective for learning, but the OSCE was most favored for continued use in clinical training (52.8%). <b>Conclusions:</b> Faculty members in Saudi dental schools generally view the OSCE as a fair, valid, and effective assessment method. Despite concerns about student preparedness and perceived difficulty, the OSCE is endorsed as a key tool for evaluating clinical competencies. Addressing these concerns may further enhance its educational value and implementation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11269,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dentistry Journal\",\"volume\":\"13 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12468690/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dentistry Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/dj13090423\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dentistry Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/dj13090423","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)是卫生专业教育中广泛使用的评估工具。了解教师对欧安组织关于公平性、有效性、可靠性和有效性的看法,对于加强其在沙特阿拉伯牙科教育中的实施至关重要。目的:评估牙科教师对OSCE作为沙特阿拉伯评估方法的看法,与其他评估格式相比,重点关注其公平性、可靠性、有效性和有效性。方法:在沙特阿拉伯11所牙科学院的牙科教师中进行了横断面分析调查研究。一份经过修改的有效问卷通过学院院长以电子方式分发给教职员工。采用SPSS v25对应答进行分析,采用描述性和推断性统计(卡方检验,显著性设置为p≤0.05)。结果:来自沙特11所牙科学院的181名教师的反馈表明,广泛支持欧安组织,认为其公平(78.3%),结构良好(71.1%),临床技能评估全面(70%)。虽然近一半的人认为它比其他形式的压力小,但30%的人仍然认为它令人生畏。教师们认为欧安组织的任务反映了教学内容(65.9%),说明清晰(75.7%),分数在很大程度上是标准化和公正的(63.9% -72.9%)。与其他评估方法相比,短文/简答题(SAQs)被认为是最有效的学习方法,但OSCE最受欢迎继续用于临床培训(52.8%)。结论:沙特牙科学校的教师普遍认为欧安组织是一种公平、有效和有效的评估方法。尽管担心学生的准备和感知困难,欧安组织被认可为评估临床能力的关键工具。解决这些问题可以进一步提高其教育价值和实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dental Staff Members' Perception Regarding Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE): An Experience from Saudi Arabia.

Background: The Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) is a widely used assessment tool in education in the health profession. Understanding faculty perceptions of the OSCE regarding fairness, validity, reliability, and effectiveness is essential to enhancing its implementation in dental education in Saudi Arabia. Objective: To assess dental faculty members' perceptions of the OSCE as an assessment method in Saudi Arabia, focusing on its fairness, reliability, validity, and effectiveness compared to other assessment formats. Methods: A cross-sectional analytical survey-based study was conducted among dental faculty members across 11 dental colleges in Saudi Arabia. A modified validated questionnaire was distributed electronically through the college deans to faculty members. Responses were analyzed using SPSS v25, applying descriptive and inferential statistics (chi-square test, significance set at p ≤ 0.05). Results: A total of 181 faculty responses from 11 Saudi dental colleges indicated broad support for the OSCE as a fair (78.3%), well-structured (71.1%), and comprehensive assessment of clinical skills (70%). While nearly half found it less stressful than other formats, 30% still perceived it as intimidating. Faculty agreed that OSCE tasks reflected taught content (65.9%), instructions were clear (75.7%), and scores were largely standardized and unbiased (63.9-72.9%). Compared with other assessment methods, essays/ short-answer questions (SAQs) were viewed as most effective for learning, but the OSCE was most favored for continued use in clinical training (52.8%). Conclusions: Faculty members in Saudi dental schools generally view the OSCE as a fair, valid, and effective assessment method. Despite concerns about student preparedness and perceived difficulty, the OSCE is endorsed as a key tool for evaluating clinical competencies. Addressing these concerns may further enhance its educational value and implementation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Dentistry Journal
Dentistry Journal Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
213
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信