[68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC和[18F]FDG双PET成像定位来源不明的神经内分泌肿瘤。

IF 3.4 4区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Ali Zaidi, Pavithraa Ravi, Ingrid Bloise, Sara Harsini, Heather C Stuart, Hagen F Kennecke, Ian Alberts, François Bénard, Don Wilson, Patrick Martineau, Jonathan M Loree
{"title":"[68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC和[18F]FDG双PET成像定位来源不明的神经内分泌肿瘤。","authors":"Ali Zaidi, Pavithraa Ravi, Ingrid Bloise, Sara Harsini, Heather C Stuart, Hagen F Kennecke, Ian Alberts, François Bénard, Don Wilson, Patrick Martineau, Jonathan M Loree","doi":"10.3390/curroncol32090497","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Neuroendocrine tumors of unknown primary (CUP-NET) present a diagnostic challenge when conventional imaging fails to localize the primary tumor. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of concurrent [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC and [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT imaging in localizing primary tumors in patients with histologically confirmed CUP-NET. Thirty-four patients underwent both imaging modalities as part of a prospective imaging protocol after negative conventional imaging or [<sup>111</sup>In]In-octreotide scintigraphy. Primary tumor detection rates were assessed, and imaging characteristics compared between the two modalities. The overall localization rate was 58.9% (20/34). Of these, 90% (18/20) of primary tumors were identified solely by [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC PET/CT, with the remaining two visualized by both modalities. [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT did not independently localize any primary tumors. Identified primaries were limited to grade 1 (60%) or grade 2 (40%) tumors, predominantly in the small intestine (95%). Among localized cases, 45% (9/20) underwent surgical resection and 15% (3/20) became eligible for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy. [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC PET/CT demonstrated superior detection of metastatic lesions compared to [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT (97.1% vs. 70.6%, <i>p</i> = 0.006). No significant survival differences were observed between patients with localized versus non-localized primaries. These findings support the value of [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC PET/CT for identifying primary tumors in CUP-NET. Further research is warranted to explore the role of [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT in high-grade NETs.</p>","PeriodicalId":11012,"journal":{"name":"Current oncology","volume":"32 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12468915/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dual PET Imaging with [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC and [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG to Localize Neuroendocrine Tumors of Unknown Origin.\",\"authors\":\"Ali Zaidi, Pavithraa Ravi, Ingrid Bloise, Sara Harsini, Heather C Stuart, Hagen F Kennecke, Ian Alberts, François Bénard, Don Wilson, Patrick Martineau, Jonathan M Loree\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/curroncol32090497\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Neuroendocrine tumors of unknown primary (CUP-NET) present a diagnostic challenge when conventional imaging fails to localize the primary tumor. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of concurrent [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC and [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT imaging in localizing primary tumors in patients with histologically confirmed CUP-NET. Thirty-four patients underwent both imaging modalities as part of a prospective imaging protocol after negative conventional imaging or [<sup>111</sup>In]In-octreotide scintigraphy. Primary tumor detection rates were assessed, and imaging characteristics compared between the two modalities. The overall localization rate was 58.9% (20/34). Of these, 90% (18/20) of primary tumors were identified solely by [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC PET/CT, with the remaining two visualized by both modalities. [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT did not independently localize any primary tumors. Identified primaries were limited to grade 1 (60%) or grade 2 (40%) tumors, predominantly in the small intestine (95%). Among localized cases, 45% (9/20) underwent surgical resection and 15% (3/20) became eligible for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy. [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC PET/CT demonstrated superior detection of metastatic lesions compared to [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT (97.1% vs. 70.6%, <i>p</i> = 0.006). No significant survival differences were observed between patients with localized versus non-localized primaries. These findings support the value of [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC PET/CT for identifying primary tumors in CUP-NET. Further research is warranted to explore the role of [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT in high-grade NETs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11012,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current oncology\",\"volume\":\"32 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12468915/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32090497\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32090497","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

神经内分泌肿瘤的未知原发(CUP-NET)提出了诊断挑战,当常规影像学不能定位原发肿瘤。本研究旨在评价[68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC和[18F]FDG PET/CT同时成像对组织学证实的CUP-NET患者原发肿瘤定位的诊断价值。34例患者在阴性常规成像或[111]In-octreotide显像后接受了两种成像方式作为前瞻性成像方案的一部分。评估原发肿瘤的检出率,并比较两种方式的影像学特征。总体定位率为58.9%(20/34)。其中,90%(18/20)的原发性肿瘤仅通过[68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC PET/CT识别,其余2例采用两种方式显示。[18F]FDG PET/CT未独立定位任何原发肿瘤。确定的原发性肿瘤局限于1级(60%)或2级(40%)肿瘤,主要发生在小肠(95%)。在局部病例中,45%(9/20)接受手术切除,15%(3/20)适合肽受体放射性核素治疗。[68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC PET/CT对转移灶的检出率优于[18F]FDG PET/CT (97.1% vs. 70.6%, p = 0.006)。在局部和非局部原发患者之间没有观察到显著的生存差异。这些发现支持了[68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC PET/CT在鉴别CUP-NET原发肿瘤中的价值。[18F]FDG PET/CT在高级别NETs中的作用有待进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dual PET Imaging with [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC and [18F]FDG to Localize Neuroendocrine Tumors of Unknown Origin.

Neuroendocrine tumors of unknown primary (CUP-NET) present a diagnostic challenge when conventional imaging fails to localize the primary tumor. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of concurrent [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC and [18F]FDG PET/CT imaging in localizing primary tumors in patients with histologically confirmed CUP-NET. Thirty-four patients underwent both imaging modalities as part of a prospective imaging protocol after negative conventional imaging or [111In]In-octreotide scintigraphy. Primary tumor detection rates were assessed, and imaging characteristics compared between the two modalities. The overall localization rate was 58.9% (20/34). Of these, 90% (18/20) of primary tumors were identified solely by [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC PET/CT, with the remaining two visualized by both modalities. [18F]FDG PET/CT did not independently localize any primary tumors. Identified primaries were limited to grade 1 (60%) or grade 2 (40%) tumors, predominantly in the small intestine (95%). Among localized cases, 45% (9/20) underwent surgical resection and 15% (3/20) became eligible for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy. [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC PET/CT demonstrated superior detection of metastatic lesions compared to [18F]FDG PET/CT (97.1% vs. 70.6%, p = 0.006). No significant survival differences were observed between patients with localized versus non-localized primaries. These findings support the value of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC PET/CT for identifying primary tumors in CUP-NET. Further research is warranted to explore the role of [18F]FDG PET/CT in high-grade NETs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current oncology
Current oncology ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
664
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Current Oncology is a peer-reviewed, Canadian-based and internationally respected journal. Current Oncology represents a multidisciplinary medium encompassing health care workers in the field of cancer therapy in Canada to report upon and to review progress in the management of this disease. We encourage submissions from all fields of cancer medicine, including radiation oncology, surgical oncology, medical oncology, pediatric oncology, pathology, and cancer rehabilitation and survivorship. Articles published in the journal typically contain information that is relevant directly to clinical oncology practice, and have clear potential for application to the current or future practice of cancer medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信