年龄分层的可切除胃癌辅助化疗的临床病理特征和疗效:一项东西方人群为基础的研究。

IF 3.4 4区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Zijian Deng, Jianping Guo, Zhizhong Xiong, Bin Zhong, Dayin Huang, Haoyang Xu, Shi Chen, Lei Lian
{"title":"年龄分层的可切除胃癌辅助化疗的临床病理特征和疗效:一项东西方人群为基础的研究。","authors":"Zijian Deng, Jianping Guo, Zhizhong Xiong, Bin Zhong, Dayin Huang, Haoyang Xu, Shi Chen, Lei Lian","doi":"10.3390/curroncol32090480","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The incidence of early-onset gastric cancer (EOGC) has been steadily increasing in recent years. However, the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) in this population remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the clinicopathological characteristics, survival outcomes, and efficacy of AC between EOGC and average-onset gastric cancer (AOGC) patients. <b>Methods:</b> Patients with stage II-III gastric adenocarcinomas who underwent curative D2 gastrectomy at the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University from January 2014 to December 2021 were enrolled and classified into two groups: EOGC (≤45 years) and AOGC (>45 years) groups. Clinicopathological characteristics, overall survival (OS), and efficacy of AC were compared between the two groups. Western and East Asian cohorts were included as external validation sets to compare the efficacy of AC between different age groups. <b>Results:</b> Compared to AOGC, EOGC patients exhibited a higher proportion of females, poor differentiation, diffuse Lauren type, middle-third GC, perineural invasion (PNI), and receipt of AC. Univariate and multivariate analyses identified that T stage, N stage, PNI, and AC were independent prognostic factors for OS. After balancing the baseline characteristics between patients who received AC and those who did not, the Kaplan-Meier survival curves indicated that AC significantly improved OS across all patients. Further subgroup analysis revealed a survival benefit of AC in AOGC patients, whereas no significant survival difference was observed in the EOGC subgroup. Consistently, external validation in both Western and East Asian cohorts confirmed that AC did not confer a survival advantage in EOGC patients. <b>Conclusions:</b> EOGC exhibits aggressive pathological characteristics, and chemotherapy does not consistently improve survival in EOGC patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":11012,"journal":{"name":"Current oncology","volume":"32 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12468768/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Age-Stratified Clinicopathological Features and Efficacy of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Resectable Gastric Cancer: An East-West Population-Based Study.\",\"authors\":\"Zijian Deng, Jianping Guo, Zhizhong Xiong, Bin Zhong, Dayin Huang, Haoyang Xu, Shi Chen, Lei Lian\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/curroncol32090480\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The incidence of early-onset gastric cancer (EOGC) has been steadily increasing in recent years. However, the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) in this population remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the clinicopathological characteristics, survival outcomes, and efficacy of AC between EOGC and average-onset gastric cancer (AOGC) patients. <b>Methods:</b> Patients with stage II-III gastric adenocarcinomas who underwent curative D2 gastrectomy at the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University from January 2014 to December 2021 were enrolled and classified into two groups: EOGC (≤45 years) and AOGC (>45 years) groups. Clinicopathological characteristics, overall survival (OS), and efficacy of AC were compared between the two groups. Western and East Asian cohorts were included as external validation sets to compare the efficacy of AC between different age groups. <b>Results:</b> Compared to AOGC, EOGC patients exhibited a higher proportion of females, poor differentiation, diffuse Lauren type, middle-third GC, perineural invasion (PNI), and receipt of AC. Univariate and multivariate analyses identified that T stage, N stage, PNI, and AC were independent prognostic factors for OS. After balancing the baseline characteristics between patients who received AC and those who did not, the Kaplan-Meier survival curves indicated that AC significantly improved OS across all patients. Further subgroup analysis revealed a survival benefit of AC in AOGC patients, whereas no significant survival difference was observed in the EOGC subgroup. Consistently, external validation in both Western and East Asian cohorts confirmed that AC did not confer a survival advantage in EOGC patients. <b>Conclusions:</b> EOGC exhibits aggressive pathological characteristics, and chemotherapy does not consistently improve survival in EOGC patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11012,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current oncology\",\"volume\":\"32 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12468768/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32090480\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32090480","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:近年来,早发性胃癌(EOGC)的发病率稳步上升。然而,辅助化疗(AC)在这一人群中的疗效尚不清楚。本研究旨在探讨EOGC与平均发病胃癌(AOGC)患者AC的临床病理特征、生存结局及疗效。方法:选取2014年1月至2021年12月中山大学附属第六医院行根治性D2胃切除术的II-III期胃腺癌患者,分为EOGC组(≤45岁)和AOGC组(bb0 45岁)。比较两组患者的临床病理特征、总生存期(OS)及AC的疗效。西方和东亚队列被纳入外部验证集,以比较不同年龄组之间AC的疗效。结果:与AOGC相比,EOGC患者表现出更高的女性比例、分化差、弥漫性Lauren型、中三分之一GC、神经周围浸润(PNI)和接受AC。单因素和多因素分析发现T期、N期、PNI和AC是OS的独立预后因素。在平衡了接受AC和未接受AC的患者的基线特征后,Kaplan-Meier生存曲线显示AC显著改善了所有患者的OS。进一步的亚组分析显示AC在AOGC患者中有生存获益,而在EOGC亚组中没有观察到显著的生存差异。与此一致的是,在西方和东亚的队列中,外部验证证实AC并没有赋予EOGC患者生存优势。结论:EOGC具有侵袭性病理特征,化疗并不能持续提高EOGC患者的生存率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Age-Stratified Clinicopathological Features and Efficacy of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Resectable Gastric Cancer: An East-West Population-Based Study.

Background: The incidence of early-onset gastric cancer (EOGC) has been steadily increasing in recent years. However, the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) in this population remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the clinicopathological characteristics, survival outcomes, and efficacy of AC between EOGC and average-onset gastric cancer (AOGC) patients. Methods: Patients with stage II-III gastric adenocarcinomas who underwent curative D2 gastrectomy at the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University from January 2014 to December 2021 were enrolled and classified into two groups: EOGC (≤45 years) and AOGC (>45 years) groups. Clinicopathological characteristics, overall survival (OS), and efficacy of AC were compared between the two groups. Western and East Asian cohorts were included as external validation sets to compare the efficacy of AC between different age groups. Results: Compared to AOGC, EOGC patients exhibited a higher proportion of females, poor differentiation, diffuse Lauren type, middle-third GC, perineural invasion (PNI), and receipt of AC. Univariate and multivariate analyses identified that T stage, N stage, PNI, and AC were independent prognostic factors for OS. After balancing the baseline characteristics between patients who received AC and those who did not, the Kaplan-Meier survival curves indicated that AC significantly improved OS across all patients. Further subgroup analysis revealed a survival benefit of AC in AOGC patients, whereas no significant survival difference was observed in the EOGC subgroup. Consistently, external validation in both Western and East Asian cohorts confirmed that AC did not confer a survival advantage in EOGC patients. Conclusions: EOGC exhibits aggressive pathological characteristics, and chemotherapy does not consistently improve survival in EOGC patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current oncology
Current oncology ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
664
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Current Oncology is a peer-reviewed, Canadian-based and internationally respected journal. Current Oncology represents a multidisciplinary medium encompassing health care workers in the field of cancer therapy in Canada to report upon and to review progress in the management of this disease. We encourage submissions from all fields of cancer medicine, including radiation oncology, surgical oncology, medical oncology, pediatric oncology, pathology, and cancer rehabilitation and survivorship. Articles published in the journal typically contain information that is relevant directly to clinical oncology practice, and have clear potential for application to the current or future practice of cancer medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信