Heather Halperin, Philip Akude, Seema King, Patricia Biondo, Aynharan Sinnarajah, Desiree Hao, Jessica Simon
{"title":"评估谁接受早期姑息治疗咨询的差异。","authors":"Heather Halperin, Philip Akude, Seema King, Patricia Biondo, Aynharan Sinnarajah, Desiree Hao, Jessica Simon","doi":"10.3390/curroncol32090485","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Early palliative care improves quality of life for patients with life-limiting illnesses, but access is often inequitable. The goal of this study was to assess disparities in early specialist palliative care (SPC) consultation among newly diagnosed stage IV lung cancer patients. All newly diagnosed stage IV lung cancer patients in southern Alberta, Canada (June 2021-March 2022) were offered SPC consultations from a multidisciplinary team, post-oncology visit. A retrospective chart review analyzed demographic factors and consultation outcomes (accepted, ineligible, declined/unreachable), using the Pampalon Deprivation Index and NamSor surname analysis as proxies for equity-related variables. Of 113 patients, 76.2% were eligible for consultation, and 67.4% of those accepted consultation. Older age (>65 years), male sex, and high deprivation were linked to declining SPC (<i>p</i> < 0.05-0.01). Conversely, living alone or with a non-partner increased acceptance (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Age, sex, deprivation, and living situation influenced SPC acceptance. Identifying disparities can guide interventions to improve equitable access.</p>","PeriodicalId":11012,"journal":{"name":"Current oncology","volume":"32 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12468974/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing Disparities in Who Accepts an Early Palliative Care Consultation.\",\"authors\":\"Heather Halperin, Philip Akude, Seema King, Patricia Biondo, Aynharan Sinnarajah, Desiree Hao, Jessica Simon\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/curroncol32090485\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Early palliative care improves quality of life for patients with life-limiting illnesses, but access is often inequitable. The goal of this study was to assess disparities in early specialist palliative care (SPC) consultation among newly diagnosed stage IV lung cancer patients. All newly diagnosed stage IV lung cancer patients in southern Alberta, Canada (June 2021-March 2022) were offered SPC consultations from a multidisciplinary team, post-oncology visit. A retrospective chart review analyzed demographic factors and consultation outcomes (accepted, ineligible, declined/unreachable), using the Pampalon Deprivation Index and NamSor surname analysis as proxies for equity-related variables. Of 113 patients, 76.2% were eligible for consultation, and 67.4% of those accepted consultation. Older age (>65 years), male sex, and high deprivation were linked to declining SPC (<i>p</i> < 0.05-0.01). Conversely, living alone or with a non-partner increased acceptance (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Age, sex, deprivation, and living situation influenced SPC acceptance. Identifying disparities can guide interventions to improve equitable access.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11012,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current oncology\",\"volume\":\"32 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12468974/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32090485\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32090485","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Assessing Disparities in Who Accepts an Early Palliative Care Consultation.
Early palliative care improves quality of life for patients with life-limiting illnesses, but access is often inequitable. The goal of this study was to assess disparities in early specialist palliative care (SPC) consultation among newly diagnosed stage IV lung cancer patients. All newly diagnosed stage IV lung cancer patients in southern Alberta, Canada (June 2021-March 2022) were offered SPC consultations from a multidisciplinary team, post-oncology visit. A retrospective chart review analyzed demographic factors and consultation outcomes (accepted, ineligible, declined/unreachable), using the Pampalon Deprivation Index and NamSor surname analysis as proxies for equity-related variables. Of 113 patients, 76.2% were eligible for consultation, and 67.4% of those accepted consultation. Older age (>65 years), male sex, and high deprivation were linked to declining SPC (p < 0.05-0.01). Conversely, living alone or with a non-partner increased acceptance (p < 0.05). Age, sex, deprivation, and living situation influenced SPC acceptance. Identifying disparities can guide interventions to improve equitable access.
期刊介绍:
Current Oncology is a peer-reviewed, Canadian-based and internationally respected journal. Current Oncology represents a multidisciplinary medium encompassing health care workers in the field of cancer therapy in Canada to report upon and to review progress in the management of this disease.
We encourage submissions from all fields of cancer medicine, including radiation oncology, surgical oncology, medical oncology, pediatric oncology, pathology, and cancer rehabilitation and survivorship. Articles published in the journal typically contain information that is relevant directly to clinical oncology practice, and have clear potential for application to the current or future practice of cancer medicine.