评估谁接受早期姑息治疗咨询的差异。

IF 3.4 4区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Heather Halperin, Philip Akude, Seema King, Patricia Biondo, Aynharan Sinnarajah, Desiree Hao, Jessica Simon
{"title":"评估谁接受早期姑息治疗咨询的差异。","authors":"Heather Halperin, Philip Akude, Seema King, Patricia Biondo, Aynharan Sinnarajah, Desiree Hao, Jessica Simon","doi":"10.3390/curroncol32090485","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Early palliative care improves quality of life for patients with life-limiting illnesses, but access is often inequitable. The goal of this study was to assess disparities in early specialist palliative care (SPC) consultation among newly diagnosed stage IV lung cancer patients. All newly diagnosed stage IV lung cancer patients in southern Alberta, Canada (June 2021-March 2022) were offered SPC consultations from a multidisciplinary team, post-oncology visit. A retrospective chart review analyzed demographic factors and consultation outcomes (accepted, ineligible, declined/unreachable), using the Pampalon Deprivation Index and NamSor surname analysis as proxies for equity-related variables. Of 113 patients, 76.2% were eligible for consultation, and 67.4% of those accepted consultation. Older age (>65 years), male sex, and high deprivation were linked to declining SPC (<i>p</i> < 0.05-0.01). Conversely, living alone or with a non-partner increased acceptance (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Age, sex, deprivation, and living situation influenced SPC acceptance. Identifying disparities can guide interventions to improve equitable access.</p>","PeriodicalId":11012,"journal":{"name":"Current oncology","volume":"32 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12468974/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing Disparities in Who Accepts an Early Palliative Care Consultation.\",\"authors\":\"Heather Halperin, Philip Akude, Seema King, Patricia Biondo, Aynharan Sinnarajah, Desiree Hao, Jessica Simon\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/curroncol32090485\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Early palliative care improves quality of life for patients with life-limiting illnesses, but access is often inequitable. The goal of this study was to assess disparities in early specialist palliative care (SPC) consultation among newly diagnosed stage IV lung cancer patients. All newly diagnosed stage IV lung cancer patients in southern Alberta, Canada (June 2021-March 2022) were offered SPC consultations from a multidisciplinary team, post-oncology visit. A retrospective chart review analyzed demographic factors and consultation outcomes (accepted, ineligible, declined/unreachable), using the Pampalon Deprivation Index and NamSor surname analysis as proxies for equity-related variables. Of 113 patients, 76.2% were eligible for consultation, and 67.4% of those accepted consultation. Older age (>65 years), male sex, and high deprivation were linked to declining SPC (<i>p</i> < 0.05-0.01). Conversely, living alone or with a non-partner increased acceptance (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Age, sex, deprivation, and living situation influenced SPC acceptance. Identifying disparities can guide interventions to improve equitable access.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11012,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current oncology\",\"volume\":\"32 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12468974/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32090485\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32090485","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

早期姑息治疗可改善患有限制生命的疾病的患者的生活质量,但可及性往往不公平。本研究的目的是评估新诊断的IV期肺癌患者早期专科姑息治疗(SPC)咨询的差异。在加拿大阿尔伯塔省南部(2021年6月至2022年3月),所有新诊断的IV期肺癌患者都接受了多学科团队的SPC咨询,并进行了肿瘤后访问。回顾性图表分析了人口统计因素和咨询结果(接受、不合格、拒绝/无法联系),使用Pampalon剥夺指数和NamSor姓氏分析作为股票相关变量的代理。113例患者中,76.2%符合会诊条件,67.4%接受会诊。年龄较大(60 ~ 65岁)、男性和重度剥夺与SPC下降有关(p < 0.05 ~ 0.01)。相反,独居或无伴侣生活增加了接受度(p < 0.05)。年龄、性别、贫困和生活状况影响SPC的接受程度。确定差异可以指导干预措施,以改善公平获取。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing Disparities in Who Accepts an Early Palliative Care Consultation.

Early palliative care improves quality of life for patients with life-limiting illnesses, but access is often inequitable. The goal of this study was to assess disparities in early specialist palliative care (SPC) consultation among newly diagnosed stage IV lung cancer patients. All newly diagnosed stage IV lung cancer patients in southern Alberta, Canada (June 2021-March 2022) were offered SPC consultations from a multidisciplinary team, post-oncology visit. A retrospective chart review analyzed demographic factors and consultation outcomes (accepted, ineligible, declined/unreachable), using the Pampalon Deprivation Index and NamSor surname analysis as proxies for equity-related variables. Of 113 patients, 76.2% were eligible for consultation, and 67.4% of those accepted consultation. Older age (>65 years), male sex, and high deprivation were linked to declining SPC (p < 0.05-0.01). Conversely, living alone or with a non-partner increased acceptance (p < 0.05). Age, sex, deprivation, and living situation influenced SPC acceptance. Identifying disparities can guide interventions to improve equitable access.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current oncology
Current oncology ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
664
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Current Oncology is a peer-reviewed, Canadian-based and internationally respected journal. Current Oncology represents a multidisciplinary medium encompassing health care workers in the field of cancer therapy in Canada to report upon and to review progress in the management of this disease. We encourage submissions from all fields of cancer medicine, including radiation oncology, surgical oncology, medical oncology, pediatric oncology, pathology, and cancer rehabilitation and survivorship. Articles published in the journal typically contain information that is relevant directly to clinical oncology practice, and have clear potential for application to the current or future practice of cancer medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信