反思临床试验(反应)计划:一个实用的研究策略,以提高癌症护理的病人,护理人员和医疗保健系统。

IF 3.4 4区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Marie-France Savard, Mark Clemons, Sharon F McGee
{"title":"反思临床试验(反应)计划:一个实用的研究策略,以提高癌症护理的病人,护理人员和医疗保健系统。","authors":"Marie-France Savard, Mark Clemons, Sharon F McGee","doi":"10.3390/curroncol32090484","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cancer care has become increasingly complex, expensive, and inaccessible, with patients often exposed to increased treatment-related harms for marginal benefits. Pragmatic clinical trials offer a solution by conducting real-world studies that evaluate dose optimization, toxicity, quality of life, and resource utilization. Pragmatic trials can also address the efficacy-effectiveness gap: the poorer outcomes and greater toxicity observed in everyday practice compared to those reported in many clinical trials. The Rethinking Clinical Trials (REaCT) program was designed to conduct patient-centered practice-changing research by involving patients, their families, and healthcare providers in the design of inclusive, real-world clinical trials. The REaCT process starts with surveys and systematic reviews to identify knowledge gaps and uses this information to design pragmatic clinical trials that address these deficits. Since 2014, the program has conducted 17 patient and 17 healthcare provider surveys with 2298 and 1033 responses, respectively. With these results, the program has performed 22 systematic reviews. These surveys and systematic reviews have resulted in 19 completed and 8 ongoing REaCT clinical trials that have recruited over 5000 patients from across Canada. Here, we present some of the practice-changing research conducted by the REaCT program and address challenges facing the growth of pragmatic research.</p>","PeriodicalId":11012,"journal":{"name":"Current oncology","volume":"32 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12468308/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Rethinking Clinical Trials (REaCT) Program: A Pragmatic Research Strategy to Improve Cancer Care for Patients, Caregivers, and Healthcare Systems.\",\"authors\":\"Marie-France Savard, Mark Clemons, Sharon F McGee\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/curroncol32090484\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Cancer care has become increasingly complex, expensive, and inaccessible, with patients often exposed to increased treatment-related harms for marginal benefits. Pragmatic clinical trials offer a solution by conducting real-world studies that evaluate dose optimization, toxicity, quality of life, and resource utilization. Pragmatic trials can also address the efficacy-effectiveness gap: the poorer outcomes and greater toxicity observed in everyday practice compared to those reported in many clinical trials. The Rethinking Clinical Trials (REaCT) program was designed to conduct patient-centered practice-changing research by involving patients, their families, and healthcare providers in the design of inclusive, real-world clinical trials. The REaCT process starts with surveys and systematic reviews to identify knowledge gaps and uses this information to design pragmatic clinical trials that address these deficits. Since 2014, the program has conducted 17 patient and 17 healthcare provider surveys with 2298 and 1033 responses, respectively. With these results, the program has performed 22 systematic reviews. These surveys and systematic reviews have resulted in 19 completed and 8 ongoing REaCT clinical trials that have recruited over 5000 patients from across Canada. Here, we present some of the practice-changing research conducted by the REaCT program and address challenges facing the growth of pragmatic research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11012,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current oncology\",\"volume\":\"32 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12468308/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32090484\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32090484","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

癌症治疗变得越来越复杂、昂贵和难以获得,患者往往为了获得边际效益而面临更多的治疗相关危害。实用的临床试验提供了一个解决方案,通过进行真实世界的研究来评估剂量优化、毒性、生活质量和资源利用。务实的试验也可以解决疗效差距:与许多临床试验报告相比,在日常实践中观察到的较差结果和较大毒性。Rethinking Clinical Trials (REaCT)项目旨在开展以患者为中心的改变实践的研究,让患者、其家属和医疗保健提供者参与设计包容性的、真实世界的临床试验。REaCT流程从调查和系统审查开始,以确定知识差距,并利用这些信息设计实用的临床试验,以解决这些缺陷。自2014年以来,该项目已对17名患者和17名医疗保健提供者进行了调查,分别收到2298份和1033份回复。有了这些结果,该项目进行了22次系统审查。这些调查和系统评价导致19项已完成和8项正在进行的REaCT临床试验,从加拿大各地招募了5000多名患者。在这里,我们介绍了REaCT项目进行的一些改变实践的研究,并解决了实用主义研究增长所面临的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Rethinking Clinical Trials (REaCT) Program: A Pragmatic Research Strategy to Improve Cancer Care for Patients, Caregivers, and Healthcare Systems.

Cancer care has become increasingly complex, expensive, and inaccessible, with patients often exposed to increased treatment-related harms for marginal benefits. Pragmatic clinical trials offer a solution by conducting real-world studies that evaluate dose optimization, toxicity, quality of life, and resource utilization. Pragmatic trials can also address the efficacy-effectiveness gap: the poorer outcomes and greater toxicity observed in everyday practice compared to those reported in many clinical trials. The Rethinking Clinical Trials (REaCT) program was designed to conduct patient-centered practice-changing research by involving patients, their families, and healthcare providers in the design of inclusive, real-world clinical trials. The REaCT process starts with surveys and systematic reviews to identify knowledge gaps and uses this information to design pragmatic clinical trials that address these deficits. Since 2014, the program has conducted 17 patient and 17 healthcare provider surveys with 2298 and 1033 responses, respectively. With these results, the program has performed 22 systematic reviews. These surveys and systematic reviews have resulted in 19 completed and 8 ongoing REaCT clinical trials that have recruited over 5000 patients from across Canada. Here, we present some of the practice-changing research conducted by the REaCT program and address challenges facing the growth of pragmatic research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current oncology
Current oncology ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
664
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Current Oncology is a peer-reviewed, Canadian-based and internationally respected journal. Current Oncology represents a multidisciplinary medium encompassing health care workers in the field of cancer therapy in Canada to report upon and to review progress in the management of this disease. We encourage submissions from all fields of cancer medicine, including radiation oncology, surgical oncology, medical oncology, pediatric oncology, pathology, and cancer rehabilitation and survivorship. Articles published in the journal typically contain information that is relevant directly to clinical oncology practice, and have clear potential for application to the current or future practice of cancer medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信