Sorana Nicoleta Rosu, Monica Silvia Tatarciuc, Anca Mihaela Vitalariu, Iulian-Costin Lupu, Diana Antonela Diaconu, Roxana-Ionela Vasluianu, Catalina Cioloca Holban, Ana Maria Dima
{"title":"增强现实在种植体和牙齿支持的修复实践和教育:范围审查。","authors":"Sorana Nicoleta Rosu, Monica Silvia Tatarciuc, Anca Mihaela Vitalariu, Iulian-Costin Lupu, Diana Antonela Diaconu, Roxana-Ionela Vasluianu, Catalina Cioloca Holban, Ana Maria Dima","doi":"10.3390/dj13090435","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Augmented reality (AR) is revolutionizing implant and tooth-supported prosthodontics (ITSP) through enhanced precision, workflow efficiency, and educational outcomes. This scoping review systematically evaluates AR's clinical applications, educational impacts, and implementation challenges. <b>Methods:</b> Following PRISMA-ScR guidelines, comprehensive searches were conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase (2015-2025) for peer-reviewed studies on AR in ITSP. Eighteen studies met inclusion criteria after dual independent screening. Data extraction focused on clinical outcomes, educational benefits, and technological limitations. <b>Results:</b> AR applications demonstrated: <i>ITSP Practice</i>: Submillimeter implant placement accuracy (0.42-0.69 mm entry deviation; <i>p</i> < 0.001 vs. freehand), 30% faster intraoral scanning (44 s vs. 63 s), and 37% reduction in preparation errors (<i>p</i> < 0.05); <i>ITSP Education</i>: 22-30% faster skill acquisition (<i>p</i> < 0.05) and 99% reduction in assessment time (10.5 s vs. 2 h/case). Key Gaps: Limited to two randomized controlled trials (RCTs), hardware costs ($3500-$10,000), and lack of standardized validation protocols. <b>Conclusions:</b> While AR significantly enhances ITSP precision and training efficiency, widespread adoption requires longitudinal clinical validation, cost-effectiveness analyses, and interoperable digital workflows.</p>","PeriodicalId":11269,"journal":{"name":"Dentistry Journal","volume":"13 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12468532/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Augmented Reality in Implant and Tooth-Supported Prosthodontics Practice and Education: A Scoping Review.\",\"authors\":\"Sorana Nicoleta Rosu, Monica Silvia Tatarciuc, Anca Mihaela Vitalariu, Iulian-Costin Lupu, Diana Antonela Diaconu, Roxana-Ionela Vasluianu, Catalina Cioloca Holban, Ana Maria Dima\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/dj13090435\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Augmented reality (AR) is revolutionizing implant and tooth-supported prosthodontics (ITSP) through enhanced precision, workflow efficiency, and educational outcomes. This scoping review systematically evaluates AR's clinical applications, educational impacts, and implementation challenges. <b>Methods:</b> Following PRISMA-ScR guidelines, comprehensive searches were conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase (2015-2025) for peer-reviewed studies on AR in ITSP. Eighteen studies met inclusion criteria after dual independent screening. Data extraction focused on clinical outcomes, educational benefits, and technological limitations. <b>Results:</b> AR applications demonstrated: <i>ITSP Practice</i>: Submillimeter implant placement accuracy (0.42-0.69 mm entry deviation; <i>p</i> < 0.001 vs. freehand), 30% faster intraoral scanning (44 s vs. 63 s), and 37% reduction in preparation errors (<i>p</i> < 0.05); <i>ITSP Education</i>: 22-30% faster skill acquisition (<i>p</i> < 0.05) and 99% reduction in assessment time (10.5 s vs. 2 h/case). Key Gaps: Limited to two randomized controlled trials (RCTs), hardware costs ($3500-$10,000), and lack of standardized validation protocols. <b>Conclusions:</b> While AR significantly enhances ITSP precision and training efficiency, widespread adoption requires longitudinal clinical validation, cost-effectiveness analyses, and interoperable digital workflows.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11269,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dentistry Journal\",\"volume\":\"13 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12468532/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dentistry Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/dj13090435\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dentistry Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/dj13090435","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:增强现实(AR)通过提高精度、工作流程效率和教育成果,正在彻底改变种植体和牙齿支持修复学(ITSP)。本综述系统地评估了AR的临床应用、教育影响和实施挑战。方法:根据PRISMA-ScR指南,在PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science和Embase(2015-2025)中全面检索ITSP中AR的同行评议研究。经过双重独立筛选,18项研究符合纳入标准。数据提取侧重于临床结果、教育效益和技术限制。ITSP实践:亚毫米种植体放置精度(0.42-0.69 mm进入偏差,与徒手相比p < 0.001),口腔内扫描速度提高30%(44秒对63秒),准备错误减少37% (p < 0.05);ITSP教育:技能习得加快22-30% (p < 0.05),评估时间减少99% (10.5 s vs. 2 h/例)。主要缺陷:限于两个随机对照试验(rct),硬件成本(3500- 10000美元),缺乏标准化的验证协议。结论:虽然AR显著提高了ITSP的准确性和培训效率,但广泛采用需要纵向临床验证、成本效益分析和可互操作的数字工作流程。
Augmented Reality in Implant and Tooth-Supported Prosthodontics Practice and Education: A Scoping Review.
Background: Augmented reality (AR) is revolutionizing implant and tooth-supported prosthodontics (ITSP) through enhanced precision, workflow efficiency, and educational outcomes. This scoping review systematically evaluates AR's clinical applications, educational impacts, and implementation challenges. Methods: Following PRISMA-ScR guidelines, comprehensive searches were conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase (2015-2025) for peer-reviewed studies on AR in ITSP. Eighteen studies met inclusion criteria after dual independent screening. Data extraction focused on clinical outcomes, educational benefits, and technological limitations. Results: AR applications demonstrated: ITSP Practice: Submillimeter implant placement accuracy (0.42-0.69 mm entry deviation; p < 0.001 vs. freehand), 30% faster intraoral scanning (44 s vs. 63 s), and 37% reduction in preparation errors (p < 0.05); ITSP Education: 22-30% faster skill acquisition (p < 0.05) and 99% reduction in assessment time (10.5 s vs. 2 h/case). Key Gaps: Limited to two randomized controlled trials (RCTs), hardware costs ($3500-$10,000), and lack of standardized validation protocols. Conclusions: While AR significantly enhances ITSP precision and training efficiency, widespread adoption requires longitudinal clinical validation, cost-effectiveness analyses, and interoperable digital workflows.