为养老院的老年人开发一种(数字)正念知情干预:描述和反映一种基于人的共同设计方法。

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Maren M Michaelsen, Jule Uhl, Luka Mindrup, Claudia Neumann, Lena Langer, Tobias Esch
{"title":"为养老院的老年人开发一种(数字)正念知情干预:描述和反映一种基于人的共同设计方法。","authors":"Maren M Michaelsen, Jule Uhl, Luka Mindrup, Claudia Neumann, Lena Langer, Tobias Esch","doi":"10.1186/s12877-025-06223-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mindfulness and Positive Psychology interventions have proven effective in enhancing psychosocial well-being and cognitive abilities among older adults residing in long-term care facilities. However, the implementation of health promotion measures in this population remains limited. Participatory intervention development with this target group is rare and processes of generating intervention content, format, and delivery as well as design decisions are often not well-documented. Our research aim was to use person-based co-design (PBCD) methods to facilitate the translation of meaningful stakeholder experiences into the design of an on-site and digitally delivered mindfulness-informed intervention (MII) for health promotion in nursing homes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The PBCD process involved multiple stakeholders, including the target group, their relatives, nurses and other experts from nursing homes, health insurance representatives and app developers. The iterative process comprised several key steps: theory-based selection of mind-body exercises by the project team, informal discussions with intervention experts, semi-structured interviews with the target audience (n = 3) during 12 sessions, pre-test of the exercises through an online survey with researchers (n = 15), online survey with project partners, nursing facility experts, caregivers, and the general public (n = 12). Qualitative feedback was assessed through deductive-inductive content-structuring analysis. For the digital version, the app developers created two front-end application examples, of which one was further refined based on regular feedback from the target audience and the research team.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MII (named silBERN) for health promotion comprising preparatory elements (welcoming, general information), 22 exercises and 13 exercise repetitions in 8 modules with a delivery plan over 8 weeks. 11 exercises were adopted and 8 exercises were excluded based on feedback from different stakeholders. User experience was incorporated in the app version. The main feedback referred to the complexity/comprehension of exercises. A resource-oriented view of the target group was implemented. The PBCD process proved valuable despite its time-intensive nature.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Stakeholder participation has led to interventions that fit the needs of the target group. The process of engaging all stakeholders in the PBCD process can be time-consuming and intensive. Careful reflection on the development process indicates that a preliminary phase of participation was carried out. A randomized controlled trial of the silBERN intervention is required to evaluate usability and effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":9056,"journal":{"name":"BMC Geriatrics","volume":"25 1","pages":"703"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12462116/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of a (digital) mindfulness-informed intervention for older adults in nursing homes: description and reflection of a person-based co-design approach.\",\"authors\":\"Maren M Michaelsen, Jule Uhl, Luka Mindrup, Claudia Neumann, Lena Langer, Tobias Esch\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12877-025-06223-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mindfulness and Positive Psychology interventions have proven effective in enhancing psychosocial well-being and cognitive abilities among older adults residing in long-term care facilities. However, the implementation of health promotion measures in this population remains limited. Participatory intervention development with this target group is rare and processes of generating intervention content, format, and delivery as well as design decisions are often not well-documented. Our research aim was to use person-based co-design (PBCD) methods to facilitate the translation of meaningful stakeholder experiences into the design of an on-site and digitally delivered mindfulness-informed intervention (MII) for health promotion in nursing homes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The PBCD process involved multiple stakeholders, including the target group, their relatives, nurses and other experts from nursing homes, health insurance representatives and app developers. The iterative process comprised several key steps: theory-based selection of mind-body exercises by the project team, informal discussions with intervention experts, semi-structured interviews with the target audience (n = 3) during 12 sessions, pre-test of the exercises through an online survey with researchers (n = 15), online survey with project partners, nursing facility experts, caregivers, and the general public (n = 12). Qualitative feedback was assessed through deductive-inductive content-structuring analysis. For the digital version, the app developers created two front-end application examples, of which one was further refined based on regular feedback from the target audience and the research team.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MII (named silBERN) for health promotion comprising preparatory elements (welcoming, general information), 22 exercises and 13 exercise repetitions in 8 modules with a delivery plan over 8 weeks. 11 exercises were adopted and 8 exercises were excluded based on feedback from different stakeholders. User experience was incorporated in the app version. The main feedback referred to the complexity/comprehension of exercises. A resource-oriented view of the target group was implemented. The PBCD process proved valuable despite its time-intensive nature.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Stakeholder participation has led to interventions that fit the needs of the target group. The process of engaging all stakeholders in the PBCD process can be time-consuming and intensive. Careful reflection on the development process indicates that a preliminary phase of participation was carried out. A randomized controlled trial of the silBERN intervention is required to evaluate usability and effectiveness.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9056,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Geriatrics\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"703\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12462116/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Geriatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-025-06223-x\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Geriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-025-06223-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:正念和积极心理学干预已被证明在提高长期护理机构老年人的心理社会健康和认知能力方面有效。然而,在这一人群中实施的促进健康措施仍然有限。针对这一目标群体的参与式干预开发是罕见的,并且生成干预内容、格式、交付以及设计决策的过程通常没有很好的文档记录。我们的研究目的是使用基于人的协同设计(PBCD)方法,促进将有意义的利益相关者经验转化为现场和数字化交付的正念知情干预(MII)的设计,以促进养老院的健康。方法:PBCD过程涉及多个利益相关者,包括目标群体、他们的亲属、护士和养老院的其他专家、健康保险代表和应用程序开发人员。迭代过程包括几个关键步骤:项目团队基于理论选择身心练习,与干预专家进行非正式讨论,在12次会议中与目标受众(n = 3)进行半结构化访谈,通过与研究人员进行在线调查(n = 15)对练习进行预测试,与项目合作伙伴,护理机构专家,护理人员和公众进行在线调查(n = 12)。定性反馈通过演绎-归纳内容结构分析进行评估。对于数字版本,应用程序开发人员创建了两个前端应用程序示例,其中一个是根据目标受众和研究团队的定期反馈进一步完善的。结果:MII(命名为silBERN)健康促进包括准备内容(欢迎、一般信息)、22项练习和13项重复练习,分为8个单元,交付计划为8周。根据不同利益相关者的反馈,采用了11个练习,排除了8个练习。用户体验融入到app版本中。主要的反馈是关于练习的复杂性/理解力。实现了目标群体的资源导向视图。尽管耗时,但PBCD工艺证明是有价值的。结论:利益相关者的参与导致了符合目标群体需求的干预措施。让所有利益相关者参与PBCD过程可能是耗时且密集的。对发展进程的仔细反思表明,已经进行了初步的参与阶段。需要对silBERN干预进行随机对照试验来评估可用性和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Development of a (digital) mindfulness-informed intervention for older adults in nursing homes: description and reflection of a person-based co-design approach.

Development of a (digital) mindfulness-informed intervention for older adults in nursing homes: description and reflection of a person-based co-design approach.

Development of a (digital) mindfulness-informed intervention for older adults in nursing homes: description and reflection of a person-based co-design approach.

Background: Mindfulness and Positive Psychology interventions have proven effective in enhancing psychosocial well-being and cognitive abilities among older adults residing in long-term care facilities. However, the implementation of health promotion measures in this population remains limited. Participatory intervention development with this target group is rare and processes of generating intervention content, format, and delivery as well as design decisions are often not well-documented. Our research aim was to use person-based co-design (PBCD) methods to facilitate the translation of meaningful stakeholder experiences into the design of an on-site and digitally delivered mindfulness-informed intervention (MII) for health promotion in nursing homes.

Methods: The PBCD process involved multiple stakeholders, including the target group, their relatives, nurses and other experts from nursing homes, health insurance representatives and app developers. The iterative process comprised several key steps: theory-based selection of mind-body exercises by the project team, informal discussions with intervention experts, semi-structured interviews with the target audience (n = 3) during 12 sessions, pre-test of the exercises through an online survey with researchers (n = 15), online survey with project partners, nursing facility experts, caregivers, and the general public (n = 12). Qualitative feedback was assessed through deductive-inductive content-structuring analysis. For the digital version, the app developers created two front-end application examples, of which one was further refined based on regular feedback from the target audience and the research team.

Results: MII (named silBERN) for health promotion comprising preparatory elements (welcoming, general information), 22 exercises and 13 exercise repetitions in 8 modules with a delivery plan over 8 weeks. 11 exercises were adopted and 8 exercises were excluded based on feedback from different stakeholders. User experience was incorporated in the app version. The main feedback referred to the complexity/comprehension of exercises. A resource-oriented view of the target group was implemented. The PBCD process proved valuable despite its time-intensive nature.

Conclusion: Stakeholder participation has led to interventions that fit the needs of the target group. The process of engaging all stakeholders in the PBCD process can be time-consuming and intensive. Careful reflection on the development process indicates that a preliminary phase of participation was carried out. A randomized controlled trial of the silBERN intervention is required to evaluate usability and effectiveness.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Geriatrics
BMC Geriatrics GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.30%
发文量
873
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Geriatrics is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of the health and healthcare of older people, including the effects of healthcare systems and policies. The journal also welcomes research focused on the aging process, including cellular, genetic, and physiological processes and cognitive modifications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信