预防谵妄的过渡性护理干预的实施背景、机制和结果:来自TRADE研究的混合方法过程评估。

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Natascha-Elisabeth Denninger, Simone Brefka, Gabriele Meyer, Marlene Benkert, Dhayana Dallmeier, Michael Denkinger, Martin Müller
{"title":"预防谵妄的过渡性护理干预的实施背景、机制和结果:来自TRADE研究的混合方法过程评估。","authors":"Natascha-Elisabeth Denninger, Simone Brefka, Gabriele Meyer, Marlene Benkert, Dhayana Dallmeier, Michael Denkinger, Martin Müller","doi":"10.1186/s12877-025-06331-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While predisposing factors for delirium, like old age or surgery, are well documented, less attention has been paid to environmental factors, including hospital transfer processes and caregiver involvement in transitional care of older patients. To address this gap, we developed a pathway to optimize hospital transfer processes and actively involve caregivers in preventing delirium. This complex intervention was tested in a pilot study using a stepped-wedge design across four hospitals, accompanied by a process evaluation to explore the implementation context, mechanisms and outcomes of this intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A parallel convergent mixed-methods process evaluation was used. Qualitative data and quantitative data were analyzed separately and integrated using a weaving approach. Analyses were guided by Normalization Process Theory, supplemented by implementation impact ratings based on the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research rating tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data included 72 interviews, 2 focus groups, 82 document analyses, 14 status analyses, 424 TRADE questionnaires, 58 Normalization MeAsure Development questionnaires, and website traffic metrics. COVID-19-related constraints resulted in partial implementation of the intervention, with challenges such as limited training opportunities and restricted caregiver involvement. Healthcare professionals reported greater delirium awareness, and educational materials received positive feedback.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study underscores the critical role of discharge information, post-discharge support, and education for caregiver and healthcare professionals in preventing delirium. It also provides evidence of how the COVID-19 pandemic impacted standard care and the implementation of clinical interventions, emphasizing the need for adaptable processes and institutional support. Furthermore, it offers theoretical and methodological insights into conducting mixed-methods process evaluations in complex intervention research.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>German Clinical Trials Register (ID: DRKS00017828, retrospectively registered on 17.09.2019, https://drks.de/search/en/trial/DRKS00017828 ).</p>","PeriodicalId":9056,"journal":{"name":"BMC Geriatrics","volume":"25 1","pages":"704"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12462268/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementation context, mechanisms and outcomes of a transitional care intervention to prevent delirium: a mixed-methods process evaluation from the TRADE study.\",\"authors\":\"Natascha-Elisabeth Denninger, Simone Brefka, Gabriele Meyer, Marlene Benkert, Dhayana Dallmeier, Michael Denkinger, Martin Müller\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12877-025-06331-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While predisposing factors for delirium, like old age or surgery, are well documented, less attention has been paid to environmental factors, including hospital transfer processes and caregiver involvement in transitional care of older patients. To address this gap, we developed a pathway to optimize hospital transfer processes and actively involve caregivers in preventing delirium. This complex intervention was tested in a pilot study using a stepped-wedge design across four hospitals, accompanied by a process evaluation to explore the implementation context, mechanisms and outcomes of this intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A parallel convergent mixed-methods process evaluation was used. Qualitative data and quantitative data were analyzed separately and integrated using a weaving approach. Analyses were guided by Normalization Process Theory, supplemented by implementation impact ratings based on the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research rating tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data included 72 interviews, 2 focus groups, 82 document analyses, 14 status analyses, 424 TRADE questionnaires, 58 Normalization MeAsure Development questionnaires, and website traffic metrics. COVID-19-related constraints resulted in partial implementation of the intervention, with challenges such as limited training opportunities and restricted caregiver involvement. Healthcare professionals reported greater delirium awareness, and educational materials received positive feedback.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study underscores the critical role of discharge information, post-discharge support, and education for caregiver and healthcare professionals in preventing delirium. It also provides evidence of how the COVID-19 pandemic impacted standard care and the implementation of clinical interventions, emphasizing the need for adaptable processes and institutional support. Furthermore, it offers theoretical and methodological insights into conducting mixed-methods process evaluations in complex intervention research.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>German Clinical Trials Register (ID: DRKS00017828, retrospectively registered on 17.09.2019, https://drks.de/search/en/trial/DRKS00017828 ).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9056,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Geriatrics\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"704\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12462268/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Geriatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-025-06331-8\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Geriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-025-06331-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:虽然谵妄的易感因素,如年龄或手术,已被充分记录,但对环境因素的关注较少,包括医院转院过程和护理人员参与老年患者的过渡护理。为了解决这一差距,我们开发了一种途径来优化医院转院过程,并积极参与护理人员预防谵妄。这项复杂的干预措施在一项试点研究中进行了测试,在四家医院采用楔形设计,并进行了过程评估,以探索该干预措施的实施背景、机制和结果。方法:采用并行收敛混合方法进行工艺评价。定性数据和定量数据分别进行分析,并采用编织方法进行整合。分析以规范化过程理论为指导,辅以基于实施研究综合框架评级工具的实施影响评级。结果:数据包括72个访谈、2个焦点小组、82个文献分析、14个现状分析、424份TRADE问卷、58份Normalization MeAsure Development问卷和网站流量指标。与covid -19相关的制约因素导致干预措施的部分实施,面临培训机会有限和护理人员参与受限等挑战。医疗保健专业人员报告了更多的谵妄意识,教育材料得到了积极的反馈。结论:本研究强调了出院信息、出院后支持以及护理人员和医疗保健专业人员的教育在预防谵妄方面的关键作用。报告还提供了COVID-19大流行如何影响标准护理和临床干预措施实施的证据,强调需要适应性流程和机构支持。此外,它为在复杂干预研究中进行混合方法过程评估提供了理论和方法上的见解。试验注册:德国临床试验注册(ID: DRKS00017828,回顾性注册于2019年9月17日,https://drks.de/search/en/trial/DRKS00017828)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Implementation context, mechanisms and outcomes of a transitional care intervention to prevent delirium: a mixed-methods process evaluation from the TRADE study.

Background: While predisposing factors for delirium, like old age or surgery, are well documented, less attention has been paid to environmental factors, including hospital transfer processes and caregiver involvement in transitional care of older patients. To address this gap, we developed a pathway to optimize hospital transfer processes and actively involve caregivers in preventing delirium. This complex intervention was tested in a pilot study using a stepped-wedge design across four hospitals, accompanied by a process evaluation to explore the implementation context, mechanisms and outcomes of this intervention.

Methods: A parallel convergent mixed-methods process evaluation was used. Qualitative data and quantitative data were analyzed separately and integrated using a weaving approach. Analyses were guided by Normalization Process Theory, supplemented by implementation impact ratings based on the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research rating tool.

Results: Data included 72 interviews, 2 focus groups, 82 document analyses, 14 status analyses, 424 TRADE questionnaires, 58 Normalization MeAsure Development questionnaires, and website traffic metrics. COVID-19-related constraints resulted in partial implementation of the intervention, with challenges such as limited training opportunities and restricted caregiver involvement. Healthcare professionals reported greater delirium awareness, and educational materials received positive feedback.

Conclusion: The study underscores the critical role of discharge information, post-discharge support, and education for caregiver and healthcare professionals in preventing delirium. It also provides evidence of how the COVID-19 pandemic impacted standard care and the implementation of clinical interventions, emphasizing the need for adaptable processes and institutional support. Furthermore, it offers theoretical and methodological insights into conducting mixed-methods process evaluations in complex intervention research.

Trial registration: German Clinical Trials Register (ID: DRKS00017828, retrospectively registered on 17.09.2019, https://drks.de/search/en/trial/DRKS00017828 ).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Geriatrics
BMC Geriatrics GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.30%
发文量
873
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Geriatrics is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of the health and healthcare of older people, including the effects of healthcare systems and policies. The journal also welcomes research focused on the aging process, including cellular, genetic, and physiological processes and cognitive modifications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信